| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
rethook_free()
commit 195b9cb5b288fec1c871ef89f78cc9a7461aad3a upstream.
Ensure running fprobe_exit_handler() has finished before
calling rethook_free() in the unregister_fprobe() so that caller can free
the fprobe right after unregister_fprobe().
unregister_fprobe() ensured that all running fprobe_entry/exit_handler()
have finished by calling unregister_ftrace_function() which synchronizes
RCU. But commit 5f81018753df ("fprobe: Release rethook after the ftrace_ops
is unregistered") changed to call rethook_free() after
unregister_ftrace_function(). So call rethook_stop() to make rethook
disabled before unregister_ftrace_function() and ensure it again.
Here is the possible code flow that can call the exit handler after
unregister_fprobe().
------
CPU1 CPU2
call unregister_fprobe(fp)
...
__fprobe_handler()
rethook_hook() on probed function
unregister_ftrace_function()
return from probed function
rethook hooks
find rh->handler == fprobe_exit_handler
call fprobe_exit_handler()
rethook_free():
set rh->handler = NULL;
return from unreigster_fprobe;
call fp->exit_handler() <- (*)
------
(*) At this point, the exit handler is called after returning from
unregister_fprobe().
This fixes it as following;
------
CPU1 CPU2
call unregister_fprobe()
...
rethook_stop():
set rh->handler = NULL;
__fprobe_handler()
rethook_hook() on probed function
unregister_ftrace_function()
return from probed function
rethook hooks
find rh->handler == NULL
return from rethook
rethook_free()
return from unreigster_fprobe;
------
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/168873859949.156157.13039240432299335849.stgit@devnote2/
Fixes: 5f81018753df ("fprobe: Release rethook after the ftrace_ops is unregistered")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
commit 5f81018753dfd4989e33ece1f0cb6b8aae498b82 upstream.
While running bpf selftests it's possible to get following fault:
general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address \
0x6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC NOPTI
...
Call Trace:
<TASK>
fprobe_handler+0xc1/0x270
? __pfx_bpf_testmod_init+0x10/0x10
? __pfx_bpf_testmod_init+0x10/0x10
? bpf_fentry_test1+0x5/0x10
? bpf_fentry_test1+0x5/0x10
? bpf_testmod_init+0x22/0x80
? do_one_initcall+0x63/0x2e0
? rcu_is_watching+0xd/0x40
? kmalloc_trace+0xaf/0xc0
? do_init_module+0x60/0x250
? __do_sys_finit_module+0xac/0x120
? do_syscall_64+0x37/0x90
? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
</TASK>
In unregister_fprobe function we can't release fp->rethook while it's
possible there are some of its users still running on another cpu.
Moving rethook_free call after fp->ops is unregistered with
unregister_ftrace_function call.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230615115236.3476617-1-jolsa@kernel.org/
Fixes: 5b0ab78998e3 ("fprobe: Add exit_handler support")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit 5f0c584daf7464f04114c65dd07269ee2bfedc13 ]
Unlock ftrace recursion lock when fprobe_kprobe_handler() is failed
because of some running kprobe.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230703092336.268371-1-zegao@tencent.com/
Fixes: 3cc4e2c5fbae ("fprobe: make fprobe_kprobe_handler recursion free")
Reported-by: Yafang <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/CALOAHbC6UpfFOOibdDiC7xFc5YFUgZnk3MZ=3Ny6we=AcrNbew@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Ze Gao <zegao@tencent.com>
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
fprobe_hander and fprobe_kprobe_handler has guarded ftrace recursion
detection but fprobe_exit_handler has not, which possibly introduce
recursive calls if the fprobe exit callback calls any traceable
functions. Checking in fprobe_hander or fprobe_kprobe_handler
is not enough and misses this case.
So add recursion free guard the same way as fprobe_hander. Since
ftrace recursion check does not employ ip(s), so here use entry_ip and
entry_parent_ip the same as fprobe_handler.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230517034510.15639-4-zegao@tencent.com/
Fixes: 5b0ab78998e3 ("fprobe: Add exit_handler support")
Signed-off-by: Ze Gao <zegao@tencent.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
|
|
Current implementation calls kprobe related functions before doing
ftrace recursion check in fprobe_kprobe_handler, which opens door
to kernel crash due to stack recursion if preempt_count_{add, sub}
is traceable in kprobe_busy_{begin, end}.
Things goes like this without this patch quoted from Steven:
"
fprobe_kprobe_handler() {
kprobe_busy_begin() {
preempt_disable() {
preempt_count_add() { <-- trace
fprobe_kprobe_handler() {
[ wash, rinse, repeat, CRASH!!! ]
"
By refactoring the common part out of fprobe_kprobe_handler and
fprobe_handler and call ftrace recursion detection at the very beginning,
the whole fprobe_kprobe_handler is free from recursion.
[ Fix the indentation of __fprobe_handler() parameters. ]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230517034510.15639-3-zegao@tencent.com/
Fixes: ab51e15d535e ("fprobe: Introduce FPROBE_FL_KPROBE_SHARED flag for fprobe")
Signed-off-by: Ze Gao <zegao@tencent.com>
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
|
|
The commit 39d954200bf6 ("fprobe: Skip exit_handler if entry_handler returns
!0") introduced a hidden dependency of 'ret' local variable in the
fprobe_handler(), Smatch warns the `ret` can be accessed without
initialization.
kernel/trace/fprobe.c:59 fprobe_handler()
error: uninitialized symbol 'ret'.
kernel/trace/fprobe.c
49 fpr->entry_ip = ip;
50 if (fp->entry_data_size)
51 entry_data = fpr->data;
52 }
53
54 if (fp->entry_handler)
55 ret = fp->entry_handler(fp, ip, ftrace_get_regs(fregs), entry_data);
ret is only initialized if there is an ->entry_handler
56
57 /* If entry_handler returns !0, nmissed is not counted. */
58 if (rh) {
rh is only true if there is an ->exit_handler. Presumably if you have
and ->exit_handler that means you also have a ->entry_handler but Smatch
is not smart enough to figure it out.
--> 59 if (ret)
^^^
Warning here.
60 rethook_recycle(rh);
61 else
62 rethook_hook(rh, ftrace_get_regs(fregs), true);
63 }
64 out:
65 ftrace_test_recursion_unlock(bit);
66 }
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/168100731160.79534.374827110083836722.stgit@devnote2/
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/85429a5c-a4b9-499e-b6c0-cbd313291c49@kili.mountain
Fixes: 39d954200bf6 ("fprobe: Skip exit_handler if entry_handler returns !0")
Acked-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
|
|
Skip hooking function return and calling exit_handler if the
entry_handler() returns !0.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/167526699798.433354.10998365726830117303.stgit@mhiramat.roam.corp.google.com
Cc: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
|
|
Add nr_maxactive to specify rethook_node pool size. This means
the maximum number of actively running target functions concurrently
for probing by exit_handler. Note that if the running function is
preempted or sleep, it is still counted as 'active'.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/167526697917.433354.17779774988245113106.stgit@mhiramat.roam.corp.google.com
Cc: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
|
|
Pass the private entry_data to the entry and exit handlers so that
they can share the context data, something like saved function
arguments etc.
User must specify the private entry_data size by @entry_data_size
field before registering the fprobe.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/167526696173.433354.17408372048319432574.stgit@mhiramat.roam.corp.google.com
Cc: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
|
|
Since commit ab51e15d535e ("fprobe: Introduce FPROBE_FL_KPROBE_SHARED flag
for fprobe") introduced fprobe_kprobe_handler() for fprobe::ops::func,
unregister_fprobe() fails to unregister the registered if user specifies
FPROBE_FL_KPROBE_SHARED flag.
Moreover, __register_ftrace_function() is possible to change the
ftrace_ops::func, thus we have to check fprobe::ops::saved_func instead.
To check it correctly, it should confirm the fprobe::ops::saved_func is
either fprobe_handler() or fprobe_kprobe_handler().
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/166677683946.1459107.15997653945538644683.stgit@devnote3/
Fixes: cad9931f64dc ("fprobe: Add ftrace based probe APIs")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
|
|
Check if fp->rethook succeeded to be allocated. Otherwise, if
rethook_alloc() fails, then we end up dereferencing a NULL pointer in
rethook_add_node().
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221025031209.954836-1-rafaelmendsr@gmail.com/
Fixes: 5b0ab78998e3 ("fprobe: Add exit_handler support")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Rafael Mendonca <rafaelmendsr@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
|
|
Using ftrace_lookup_symbols to speed up symbols lookup
in register_fprobe_syms API.
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220510122616.2652285-4-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Since ftrace_ops::local_hash::filter_hash field is an __rcu pointer,
we have to use rcu_access_pointer() to access it.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/164802093635.1732982.4938094876018890866.stgit@devnote2
|
|
Fix the type mismatching warning of 'rethook_node vs fprobe_rethook_node'
found by Smatch.
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/164802092611.1732982.12268174743437084619.stgit@devnote2
|
|
Introduce FPROBE_FL_KPROBE_SHARED flag for sharing fprobe callback with
kprobes safely from the viewpoint of recursion.
Since the recursion safety of the fprobe (and ftrace) is a bit different
from the kprobes, this may cause an issue if user wants to run the same
code from the fprobe and the kprobes.
The kprobes has per-cpu 'current_kprobe' variable which protects the
kprobe handler from recursion in any case. On the other hand, the fprobe
uses only ftrace_test_recursion_trylock(), which will allow interrupt
context calls another (or same) fprobe during the fprobe user handler is
running.
This is not a matter in cases if the common callback shared among the
kprobes and the fprobe has its own recursion detection, or it can handle
the recursion in the different contexts (normal/interrupt/NMI.)
But if it relies on the 'current_kprobe' recursion lock, it has to check
kprobe_running() and use kprobe_busy_*() APIs.
Fprobe has FPROBE_FL_KPROBE_SHARED flag to do this. If your common callback
code will be shared with kprobes, please set FPROBE_FL_KPROBE_SHARED
*before* registering the fprobe, like;
fprobe.flags = FPROBE_FL_KPROBE_SHARED;
register_fprobe(&fprobe, "func*", NULL);
This will protect your common callback from the nested call.
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Tested-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/164735293127.1084943.15687374237275817599.stgit@devnote2
|
|
Add exit_handler to fprobe. fprobe + rethook allows us to hook the kernel
function return. The rethook will be enabled only if the
fprobe::exit_handler is set.
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Tested-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/164735290790.1084943.10601965782208052202.stgit@devnote2
|
|
The fprobe is a wrapper API for ftrace function tracer.
Unlike kprobes, this probes only supports the function entry, but this
can probe multiple functions by one fprobe. The usage is similar, user
will set their callback to fprobe::entry_handler and call
register_fprobe*() with probed functions.
There are 3 registration interfaces,
- register_fprobe() takes filtering patterns of the functin names.
- register_fprobe_ips() takes an array of ftrace-location addresses.
- register_fprobe_syms() takes an array of function names.
The registered fprobes can be unregistered with unregister_fprobe().
e.g.
struct fprobe fp = { .entry_handler = user_handler };
const char *targets[] = { "func1", "func2", "func3"};
...
ret = register_fprobe_syms(&fp, targets, ARRAY_SIZE(targets));
...
unregister_fprobe(&fp);
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Tested-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/164735283857.1084943.1154436951479395551.stgit@devnote2
|
