summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-05-02locking/lockdep: Decrease nr_unused_locks if lock unused in zap_class()Boqun Feng
commit 495f53d5cca0f939eaed9dca90b67e7e6fb0e30c upstream. Currently, when a lock class is allocated, nr_unused_locks will be increased by 1, until it gets used: nr_unused_locks will be decreased by 1 in mark_lock(). However, one scenario is missed: a lock class may be zapped without even being used once. This could result into a situation that nr_unused_locks != 0 but no unused lock class is active in the system, and when `cat /proc/lockdep_stats`, a WARN_ON() will be triggered in a CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP=y kernel: [...] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(debug_atomic_read(nr_unused_locks) != nr_unused) [...] WARNING: CPU: 41 PID: 1121 at kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c:283 lockdep_stats_show+0xba9/0xbd0 And as a result, lockdep will be disabled after this. Therefore, nr_unused_locks needs to be accounted correctly at zap_class() time. Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250326180831.510348-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-11-08lockdep: fix deadlock issue between lockdep and rcuZhiguo Niu
commit a6f88ac32c6e63e69c595bfae220d8641704c9b7 upstream. There is a deadlock scenario between lockdep and rcu when rcu nocb feature is enabled, just as following call stack: rcuop/x -000|queued_spin_lock_slowpath(lock = 0xFFFFFF817F2A8A80, val = ?) -001|queued_spin_lock(inline) // try to hold nocb_gp_lock -001|do_raw_spin_lock(lock = 0xFFFFFF817F2A8A80) -002|__raw_spin_lock_irqsave(inline) -002|_raw_spin_lock_irqsave(lock = 0xFFFFFF817F2A8A80) -003|wake_nocb_gp_defer(inline) -003|__call_rcu_nocb_wake(rdp = 0xFFFFFF817F30B680) -004|__call_rcu_common(inline) -004|call_rcu(head = 0xFFFFFFC082EECC28, func = ?) -005|call_rcu_zapped(inline) -005|free_zapped_rcu(ch = ?)// hold graph lock -006|rcu_do_batch(rdp = 0xFFFFFF817F245680) -007|nocb_cb_wait(inline) -007|rcu_nocb_cb_kthread(arg = 0xFFFFFF817F245680) -008|kthread(_create = 0xFFFFFF80803122C0) -009|ret_from_fork(asm) rcuop/y -000|queued_spin_lock_slowpath(lock = 0xFFFFFFC08291BBC8, val = 0) -001|queued_spin_lock() -001|lockdep_lock() -001|graph_lock() // try to hold graph lock -002|lookup_chain_cache_add() -002|validate_chain() -003|lock_acquire -004|_raw_spin_lock_irqsave(lock = 0xFFFFFF817F211D80) -005|lock_timer_base(inline) -006|mod_timer(inline) -006|wake_nocb_gp_defer(inline)// hold nocb_gp_lock -006|__call_rcu_nocb_wake(rdp = 0xFFFFFF817F2A8680) -007|__call_rcu_common(inline) -007|call_rcu(head = 0xFFFFFFC0822E0B58, func = ?) -008|call_rcu_hurry(inline) -008|rcu_sync_call(inline) -008|rcu_sync_func(rhp = 0xFFFFFFC0822E0B58) -009|rcu_do_batch(rdp = 0xFFFFFF817F266680) -010|nocb_cb_wait(inline) -010|rcu_nocb_cb_kthread(arg = 0xFFFFFF817F266680) -011|kthread(_create = 0xFFFFFF8080363740) -012|ret_from_fork(asm) rcuop/x and rcuop/y are rcu nocb threads with the same nocb gp thread. This patch release the graph lock before lockdep call_rcu. Fixes: a0b0fd53e1e6 ("locking/lockdep: Free lock classes that are no longer in use") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com> Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Zhiguo Niu <zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com> Signed-off-by: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@unisoc.com> Reviewed-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240620225436.3127927-1-cmllamas@google.com Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-11-08locking/lockdep: Avoid potential access of invalid memory in lock_classWaiman Long
commit 61cc4534b6550997c97a03759ab46b29d44c0017 upstream. It was found that reading /proc/lockdep after a lockdep splat may potentially cause an access to freed memory if lockdep_unregister_key() is called after the splat but before access to /proc/lockdep [1]. This is due to the fact that graph_lock() call in lockdep_unregister_key() fails after the clearing of debug_locks by the splat process. After lockdep_unregister_key() is called, the lock_name may be freed but the corresponding lock_class structure still have a reference to it. That invalid memory pointer will then be accessed when /proc/lockdep is read by a user and a use-after-free (UAF) error will be reported if KASAN is enabled. To fix this problem, lockdep_unregister_key() is now modified to always search for a matching key irrespective of the debug_locks state and zap the corresponding lock class if a matching one is found. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/77f05c15-81b6-bddd-9650-80d5f23fe330@i-love.sakura.ne.jp/ Fixes: 8b39adbee805 ("locking/lockdep: Make lockdep_unregister_key() honor 'debug_locks' again") Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220103023558.1377055-1-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-11-08locking/lockdep: Rework lockdep_lockPeter Zijlstra
commit 248efb2158f1e23750728e92ad9db3ab60c14485 upstream. A few sites want to assert we own the graph_lock/lockdep_lock, provide a more conventional lock interface for it with a number of trivial debug checks. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200313102107.GX12561@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-11-08locking/lockdep: Fix bad recursion patternPeter Zijlstra
commit 10476e6304222ced7df9b3d5fb0a043b3c2a1ad8 upstream. There were two patterns for lockdep_recursion: Pattern-A: if (current->lockdep_recursion) return current->lockdep_recursion = 1; /* do stuff */ current->lockdep_recursion = 0; Pattern-B: current->lockdep_recursion++; /* do stuff */ current->lockdep_recursion--; But a third pattern has emerged: Pattern-C: current->lockdep_recursion = 1; /* do stuff */ current->lockdep_recursion = 0; And while this isn't broken per-se, it is highly dangerous because it doesn't nest properly. Get rid of all Pattern-C instances and shore up Pattern-A with a warning. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200313093325.GW12561@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-06-09treewide: Remove uninitialized_var() usageKees Cook
commit 3f649ab728cda8038259d8f14492fe400fbab911 upstream. Using uninitialized_var() is dangerous as it papers over real bugs[1] (or can in the future), and suppresses unrelated compiler warnings (e.g. "unused variable"). If the compiler thinks it is uninitialized, either simply initialize the variable or make compiler changes. In preparation for removing[2] the[3] macro[4], remove all remaining needless uses with the following script: git grep '\buninitialized_var\b' | cut -d: -f1 | sort -u | \ xargs perl -pi -e \ 's/\buninitialized_var\(([^\)]+)\)/\1/g; s:\s*/\* (GCC be quiet|to make compiler happy) \*/$::g;' drivers/video/fbdev/riva/riva_hw.c was manually tweaked to avoid pathological white-space. No outstanding warnings were found building allmodconfig with GCC 9.3.0 for x86_64, i386, arm64, arm, powerpc, powerpc64le, s390x, mips, sparc64, alpha, and m68k. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200603174714.192027-1-glider@google.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFw+Vbj0i=1TGqCR5vQkCzWJ0QxK6CernOU6eedsudAixw@mail.gmail.com/ [3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFwgbgqhbp1fkxvRKEpzyR5J8n1vKT1VZdz9knmPuXhOeg@mail.gmail.com/ [4] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFz2500WfbKXAx8s67wrm9=yVJu65TpLgN_ybYNv0VEOKA@mail.gmail.com/ Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> # drivers/infiniband and mlx4/mlx5 Acked-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com> # IB Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> # wireless drivers Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> # erofs Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-11-17locking/lockdep: Avoid RCU-induced noinstr failPeter Zijlstra
[ Upstream commit ce0b9c805dd66d5e49fd53ec5415ae398f4c56e6 ] vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: look_up_lock_class()+0xc7: call to rcu_read_lock_any_held() leaves .noinstr.text section Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210624095148.311980536@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-07-14lockding/lockdep: Avoid to find wrong lock dep path in check_irq_usage()Boqun Feng
[ Upstream commit 7b1f8c6179769af6ffa055e1169610b51d71edd5 ] In the step #3 of check_irq_usage(), we seach backwards to find a lock whose usage conflicts the usage of @target_entry1 on safe/unsafe. However, we should only keep the irq-unsafe usage of @target_entry1 into consideration, because it could be a case where a lock is hardirq-unsafe but soft-safe, and in check_irq_usage() we find it because its hardirq-unsafe could result into a hardirq-safe-unsafe deadlock, but currently since we don't filter out the other usage bits, so we may find a lock dependency path softirq-unsafe -> softirq-safe, which in fact doesn't cause a deadlock. And this may cause misleading lockdep splats. Fix this by only keeping LOCKF_ENABLED_IRQ_ALL bits when we try the backwards search. Reported-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210618170110.3699115-4-boqun.feng@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-07-14locking/lockdep: Fix the dep path printing for backwards BFSBoqun Feng
[ Upstream commit 69c7a5fb2482636f525f016c8333fdb9111ecb9d ] We use the same code to print backwards lock dependency path as the forwards lock dependency path, and this could result into incorrect printing because for a backwards lock_list ->trace is not the call trace where the lock of ->class is acquired. Fix this by introducing a separate function on printing the backwards dependency path. Also add a few comments about the printing while we are at it. Reported-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210618170110.3699115-2-boqun.feng@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-04-21lockdep: Add a missing initialization hint to the "INFO: Trying to register ↵Tetsuo Handa
non-static key" message [ Upstream commit 3a85969e9d912d5dd85362ee37b5f81266e00e77 ] Since this message is printed when dynamically allocated spinlocks (e.g. kzalloc()) are used without initialization (e.g. spin_lock_init()), suggest to developers to check whether initialization functions for objects were called, before making developers wonder what annotation is missing. [ mingo: Minor tweaks to the message. ] Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210321064913.4619-1-penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2020-10-01locking/lockdep: Decrement IRQ context counters when removing lock chainWaiman Long
[ Upstream commit b3b9c187dc2544923a601733a85352b9ddaba9b3 ] There are currently three counters to track the IRQ context of a lock chain - nr_hardirq_chains, nr_softirq_chains and nr_process_chains. They are incremented when a new lock chain is added, but they are not decremented when a lock chain is removed. That causes some of the statistic counts reported by /proc/lockdep_stats to be incorrect. IRQ Fix that by decrementing the right counter when a lock chain is removed. Since inc_chains() no longer accesses hardirq_context and softirq_context directly, it is moved out from the CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS conditional compilation block. Fixes: a0b0fd53e1e6 ("locking/lockdep: Free lock classes that are no longer in use") Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200206152408.24165-2-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2020-04-17locking/lockdep: Avoid recursion in lockdep_count_{for,back}ward_deps()Boqun Feng
[ Upstream commit 25016bd7f4caf5fc983bbab7403d08e64cba3004 ] Qian Cai reported a bug when PROVE_RCU_LIST=y, and read on /proc/lockdep triggered a warning: [ ] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(current->hardirqs_enabled) ... [ ] Call Trace: [ ] lock_is_held_type+0x5d/0x150 [ ] ? rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online+0x64/0x80 [ ] rcu_read_lock_any_held+0xac/0x100 [ ] ? rcu_read_lock_held+0xc0/0xc0 [ ] ? __slab_free+0x421/0x540 [ ] ? kasan_kmalloc+0x9/0x10 [ ] ? __kmalloc_node+0x1d7/0x320 [ ] ? kvmalloc_node+0x6f/0x80 [ ] __bfs+0x28a/0x3c0 [ ] ? class_equal+0x30/0x30 [ ] lockdep_count_forward_deps+0x11a/0x1a0 The warning got triggered because lockdep_count_forward_deps() call __bfs() without current->lockdep_recursion being set, as a result a lockdep internal function (__bfs()) is checked by lockdep, which is unexpected, and the inconsistency between the irq-off state and the state traced by lockdep caused the warning. Apart from this warning, lockdep internal functions like __bfs() should always be protected by current->lockdep_recursion to avoid potential deadlocks and data inconsistency, therefore add the current->lockdep_recursion on-and-off section to protect __bfs() in both lockdep_count_forward_deps() and lockdep_count_backward_deps() Reported-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200312151258.128036-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2020-01-23locking/lockdep: Fix buffer overrun problem in stack_trace[]Waiman Long
commit d91f3057263ceb691ef527e71b41a56b17f6c869 upstream. If the lockdep code is really running out of the stack_trace entries, it is likely that buffer overrun can happen and the data immediately after stack_trace[] will be corrupted. If there is less than LOCK_TRACE_SIZE_IN_LONGS entries left before the call to save_trace(), the max_entries computation will leave it with a very large positive number because of its unsigned nature. The subsequent call to stack_trace_save() will then corrupt the data after stack_trace[]. Fix that by changing max_entries to a signed integer and check for negative value before calling stack_trace_save(). Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Fixes: 12593b7467f9 ("locking/lockdep: Reduce space occupied by stack traces") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191220135128.14876-1-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-16Merge branch 'locking-core-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull locking updates from Ingo Molnar: - improve rwsem scalability - add uninitialized rwsem debugging check - reduce lockdep's stacktrace memory usage and add diagnostics - misc cleanups, code consolidation and constification * 'locking-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: mutex: Fix up mutex_waiter usage locking/mutex: Use mutex flags macro instead of hard code locking/mutex: Make __mutex_owner static to mutex.c locking/qspinlock,x86: Clarify virt_spin_lock_key locking/rwsem: Check for operations on an uninitialized rwsem locking/rwsem: Make handoff writer optimistically spin on owner locking/lockdep: Report more stack trace statistics locking/lockdep: Reduce space occupied by stack traces stacktrace: Constify 'entries' arguments locking/lockdep: Make it clear that what lock_class::key points at is not modified
2019-08-01lockdep: Make print_lock() address visiblePaul E. McKenney
Security is a wonderful thing, but so is the ability to debug based on lockdep warnings. This commit therefore makes lockdep lock addresses visible in the clear. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
2019-07-25locking/lockdep: Report more stack trace statisticsBart Van Assche
Report the number of stack traces and the number of stack trace hash chains. These two numbers are useful because these allow to estimate the number of stack trace hash collisions. Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190722182443.216015-5-bvanassche@acm.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-25locking/lockdep: Reduce space occupied by stack tracesBart Van Assche
Although commit 669de8bda87b ("kernel/workqueue: Use dynamic lockdep keys for workqueues") unregisters dynamic lockdep keys when a workqueue is destroyed, a side effect of that commit is that all stack traces associated with the lockdep key are leaked when a workqueue is destroyed. Fix this by storing each unique stack trace once. Other changes in this patch are: - Use NULL instead of { .nr_entries = 0 } to represent 'no trace'. - Store a pointer to a stack trace in struct lock_class and struct lock_list instead of storing 'nr_entries' and 'offset'. This patch avoids that the following program triggers the "BUG: MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES too low!" complaint: #include <fcntl.h> #include <unistd.h> int main() { for (;;) { int fd = open("/dev/infiniband/rdma_cm", O_RDWR); close(fd); } } Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Reported-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190722182443.216015-4-bvanassche@acm.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-25locking/lockdep: Make it clear that what lock_class::key points at is not ↵Bart Van Assche
modified This patch does not change the behavior of the lockdep code. Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190722182443.216015-2-bvanassche@acm.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-25locking/lockdep: Clean up #ifdef checksArnd Bergmann
As Will Deacon points out, CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING implies TRACE_IRQFLAGS, so the conditions I added in the previous patch, and some others in the same file can be simplified by only checking for the former. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Fixes: 886532aee3cd ("locking/lockdep: Move mark_lock() inside CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS && CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190628102919.2345242-1-arnd@arndb.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-25locking/lockdep: Move mark_lock() inside CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS && ↵Arnd Bergmann
CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING The last cleanup patch triggered another issue, as now another function should be moved into the same section: kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3580:12: error: 'mark_lock' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function] static int mark_lock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, Move mark_lock() into the same #ifdef section as its only caller, and remove the now-unused mark_lock_irq() stub helper. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Fixes: 0d2cc3b34532 ("locking/lockdep: Move valid_state() inside CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS && CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190617124718.1232976-1-arnd@arndb.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-17locking/lockdep: Remove unnecessary DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON()Kobe Wu
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON() will turn off debug_locks and makes print_unlock_imbalance_bug() return directly. Remove a redundant whitespace. Signed-off-by: Kobe Wu <kobe-cp.wu@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: <linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org> Cc: <wsd_upstream@mediatek.com> Cc: Eason Lin <eason-yh.lin@mediatek.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1559217575-30298-1-git-send-email-kobe-cp.wu@mediatek.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Fix merging of hlocks with non-zero referencesImre Deak
The sequence static DEFINE_WW_CLASS(test_ww_class); struct ww_acquire_ctx ww_ctx; struct ww_mutex ww_lock_a; struct ww_mutex ww_lock_b; struct ww_mutex ww_lock_c; struct mutex lock_c; ww_acquire_init(&ww_ctx, &test_ww_class); ww_mutex_init(&ww_lock_a, &test_ww_class); ww_mutex_init(&ww_lock_b, &test_ww_class); ww_mutex_init(&ww_lock_c, &test_ww_class); mutex_init(&lock_c); ww_mutex_lock(&ww_lock_a, &ww_ctx); mutex_lock(&lock_c); ww_mutex_lock(&ww_lock_b, &ww_ctx); ww_mutex_lock(&ww_lock_c, &ww_ctx); mutex_unlock(&lock_c); (*) ww_mutex_unlock(&ww_lock_c); ww_mutex_unlock(&ww_lock_b); ww_mutex_unlock(&ww_lock_a); ww_acquire_fini(&ww_ctx); (**) will trigger the following error in __lock_release() when calling mutex_release() at **: DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(depth <= 0) The problem is that the hlock merging happening at * updates the references for test_ww_class incorrectly to 3 whereas it should've updated it to 4 (representing all the instances for ww_ctx and ww_lock_[abc]). Fix this by updating the references during merging correctly taking into account that we can have non-zero references (both for the hlock that we merge into another hlock or for the hlock we are merging into). Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: =?UTF-8?q?Ville=20Syrj=C3=A4l=C3=A4?= <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190524201509.9199-2-imre.deak@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Fix OOO unlock when hlocks need mergingImre Deak
The sequence static DEFINE_WW_CLASS(test_ww_class); struct ww_acquire_ctx ww_ctx; struct ww_mutex ww_lock_a; struct ww_mutex ww_lock_b; struct mutex lock_c; struct mutex lock_d; ww_acquire_init(&ww_ctx, &test_ww_class); ww_mutex_init(&ww_lock_a, &test_ww_class); ww_mutex_init(&ww_lock_b, &test_ww_class); mutex_init(&lock_c); ww_mutex_lock(&ww_lock_a, &ww_ctx); mutex_lock(&lock_c); ww_mutex_lock(&ww_lock_b, &ww_ctx); mutex_unlock(&lock_c); (*) ww_mutex_unlock(&ww_lock_b); ww_mutex_unlock(&ww_lock_a); ww_acquire_fini(&ww_ctx); triggers the following WARN in __lock_release() when doing the unlock at *: DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(curr->lockdep_depth != depth - 1); The problem is that the WARN check doesn't take into account the merging of ww_lock_a and ww_lock_b which results in decreasing curr->lockdep_depth by 2 not only 1. Note that the following sequence doesn't trigger the WARN, since there won't be any hlock merging. ww_acquire_init(&ww_ctx, &test_ww_class); ww_mutex_init(&ww_lock_a, &test_ww_class); ww_mutex_init(&ww_lock_b, &test_ww_class); mutex_init(&lock_c); mutex_init(&lock_d); ww_mutex_lock(&ww_lock_a, &ww_ctx); mutex_lock(&lock_c); mutex_lock(&lock_d); ww_mutex_lock(&ww_lock_b, &ww_ctx); mutex_unlock(&lock_d); ww_mutex_unlock(&ww_lock_b); ww_mutex_unlock(&ww_lock_a); mutex_unlock(&lock_c); ww_acquire_fini(&ww_ctx); In general both of the above two sequences are valid and shouldn't trigger any lockdep warning. Fix this by taking the decrement due to the hlock merging into account during lock release and hlock class re-setting. Merging can't happen during lock downgrading since there won't be a new possibility to merge hlocks in that case, so add a WARN if merging still happens then. Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190524201509.9199-1-imre.deak@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Remove !dir in lock irq usage checkYuyang Du
In mark_lock_irq(), the following checks are performed: ---------------------------------- | -> | unsafe | read unsafe | |----------------------------------| | safe | F B | F* B* | |----------------------------------| | read safe | F? B* | - | ---------------------------------- Where: F: check_usage_forwards B: check_usage_backwards *: check enabled by STRICT_READ_CHECKS ?: check enabled by the !dir condition From checking point of view, the special F? case does not make sense, whereas it perhaps is made for peroformance concern. As later patch will address this issue, remove this exception, which makes the checks consistent later. With STRICT_READ_CHECKS = 1 which is default, there is no functional change. Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-24-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Adjust new bit cases in mark_lockYuyang Du
The new bit can be any possible lock usage except it is garbage, so the cases in switch can be made simpler. Warn early on if wrong usage bit is passed without taking locks. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-23-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Consolidate lock usage bit initializationYuyang Du
Lock usage bit initialization is consolidated into one function mark_usage(). Trivial readability improvement. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-22-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Check redundant dependency only when CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SMALLYuyang Du
As Peter has put it all sound and complete for the cause, I simply quote: "It (check_redundant) was added for cross-release (which has since been reverted) which would generate a lot of redundant links (IIRC) but having it makes the reports more convoluted -- basically, if we had an A-B-C relation, then A-C will not be added to the graph because it is already covered. This then means any report will include B, even though a shorter cycle might have been possible." This would increase the number of direct dependencies. For a simple workload (make clean; reboot; make vmlinux -j8), the data looks like this: CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SMALL: direct dependencies: 6926 !CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SMALL: direct dependencies: 9052 (+30.7%) Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-21-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Refactorize check_noncircular and check_redundantYuyang Du
These two functions now handle different check results themselves. A new check_path function is added to check whether there is a path in the dependency graph. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-20-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Remove unused argument in __lock_releaseYuyang Du
The @nested is not used in __release_lock so remove it despite that it is not used in lock_release in the first place. Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-19-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Remove redundant argument in check_deadlockYuyang Du
In check_deadlock(), the third argument read comes from the second argument hlock so that it can be removed. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-18-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Update comments on dependency searchYuyang Du
The breadth-first search is implemented as flat-out non-recursive now, but the comments are still describing it as recursive, update the comments in that regard. Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-16-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Avoid constant checks in __bfs by using offset referenceYuyang Du
In search of a dependency in the lock graph, there is contant checks for forward or backward search. Directly reference the field offset of the struct that differentiates the type of search to avoid those checks. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-15-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Change the return type of __cq_dequeue()Yuyang Du
With the change, we can slightly adjust the code to iterate the queue in BFS search, which simplifies the code. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-14-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Change type of the element field in circular_queueYuyang Du
The element field is an array in struct circular_queue to keep track of locks in the search. Making it the same type as the locks avoids type cast. Also fix a typo and elaborate the comment above struct circular_queue. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-13-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Update commentYuyang Du
A leftover comment is removed. While at it, add more explanatory comments. Such a trivial patch! Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-12-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Remove unused argument in validate_chain() and check_deadlock()Yuyang Du
The lockdep_map argument in them is not used, remove it. Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-11-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Change the range of class_idx in held_lock structYuyang Du
held_lock->class_idx is used to point to the class of the held lock. The index is shifted by 1 to make index 0 mean no class, which results in class index shifting back and forth but is not worth doing so. The reason is: (1) there will be no "no-class" held_lock to begin with, and (2) index 0 seems to be used for error checking, but if something wrong indeed happened, the index can't be counted on to distinguish it as that something won't set the class_idx to 0 on purpose to tell us it is wrong. Therefore, change the index to start from 0. This saves a lot of back-and-forth shifts and a class slot back to lock_classes. Since index 0 is now used for lock class, we change the initial chain key to -1 to avoid key collision, which is due to the fact that __jhash_mix(0, 0, 0) = 0. Actually, the initial chain key can be any arbitrary value other than 0. In addition, a bitmap is maintained to keep track of the used lock classes, and we check the validity of the held lock against that bitmap. Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-10-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Define INITIAL_CHAIN_KEY for chain keys to start withYuyang Du
Chain keys are computed using Jenkins hash function, which needs an initial hash to start with. Dedicate a macro to make this clear and configurable. A later patch changes this initial chain key. Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-9-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Use lockdep_init_task for task initiation consistentlyYuyang Du
Despite that there is a lockdep_init_task() which does nothing, lockdep initiates tasks by assigning lockdep fields and does so inconsistently. Fix this by using lockdep_init_task(). Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-8-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Print the right depth for chain key collisionYuyang Du
Since chains are separated by IRQ context, so when printing a chain the depth should be consistent with it. Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-6-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Remove useless conditional macroYuyang Du
Since #defined(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING) is used in the scope of #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING, it can be removed. Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-5-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Adjust lock usage bit character checksYuyang Du
The lock usage bit characters are defined and determined with tricks. Add some explanation to make it a bit clearer, then adjust the logic to check the usage, which optimizes the code a bit. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-4-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Change all print_*() return type to voidYuyang Du
Since none of the print_*() function's return value is necessary, change their return type to void. No functional change. In cases where an invariable return value is used, this change slightly improves readability, i.e.: print_x(); return 0; is definitely better than: return print_x(); /* where print_x() always returns 0 */ Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-2-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-05-24locking/lockdep: Remove the unused print_lock_trace() functionAnders Roxell
gcc warns that function print_lock_trace() is unused if CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING isn't set: ../kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2820:13: warning: ‘print_lock_trace’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function] Rework so we remove the function if CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING isn't set. Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Fixes: c120bce78065 ("lockdep: Simplify stack trace handling") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190516191326.27003-1-anders.roxell@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-05-24locking/lockdep: Don't complain about incorrect name for no validate classSebastian Andrzej Siewior
It is possible to ignore the validation for a certain lock by using: lockdep_set_novalidate_class() on it. Each invocation will assign a new name to the class it created for created __lockdep_no_validate__. That means that once lockdep_set_novalidate_class() has been used on two locks then class->name won't match lock->name for the first lock triggering the warning. So ignore changed non-matching ->name pointer for the special __lockdep_no_validate__ class. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190517212234.32611-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-05-21treewide: Add SPDX license identifier for missed filesThomas Gleixner
Add SPDX license identifiers to all files which: - Have no license information of any form - Have EXPORT_.*_SYMBOL_GPL inside which was used in the initial scan/conversion to ignore the file These files fall under the project license, GPL v2 only. The resulting SPDX license identifier is: GPL-2.0-only Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-05-06Merge tag 's390-5.2-1' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux Pull s390 updates from Martin Schwidefsky: - Support for kernel address space layout randomization - Add support for kernel image signature verification - Convert s390 to the generic get_user_pages_fast code - Convert s390 to the stack unwind API analog to x86 - Add support for CPU directed interrupts for PCI devices - Provide support for MIO instructions to the PCI base layer, this will allow the use of direct PCI mappings in user space code - Add the basic KVM guest ultravisor interface for protected VMs - Add AT_HWCAP bits for several new hardware capabilities - Update the CPU measurement facility counter definitions to SVN 6 - Arnds cleanup patches for his quest to get LLVM compiles working - A vfio-ccw update with bug fixes and support for halt and clear - Improvements for the hardware TRNG code - Another round of cleanup for the QDIO layer - Numerous cleanups and bug fixes * tag 's390-5.2-1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux: (98 commits) s390/vdso: drop unnecessary cc-ldoption s390: fix clang -Wpointer-sign warnigns in boot code s390: drop CONFIG_VIRT_TO_BUS s390: boot, purgatory: pass $(CLANG_FLAGS) where needed s390: only build for new CPUs with clang s390: simplify disabled_wait s390/ftrace: use HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RET_ADDR_PTR s390/unwind: introduce stack unwind API s390/opcodes: add missing instructions to the disassembler s390/bug: add entry size to the __bug_table section s390: use proper expoline sections for .dma code s390/nospec: rename assembler generated expoline thunks s390: add missing ENDPROC statements to assembler functions locking/lockdep: check for freed initmem in static_obj() s390/kernel: add support for kernel address space layout randomization (KASLR) s390/kernel: introduce .dma sections s390/sclp: do not use static sccbs s390/kprobes: use static buffer for insn_page s390/kernel: convert SYSCALL and PGM_CHECK handlers to .quad s390/kernel: build a relocatable kernel ...
2019-05-06Merge branch 'locking-core-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull locking updates from Ingo Molnar: "Here are the locking changes in this cycle: - rwsem unification and simpler micro-optimizations to prepare for more intrusive (and more lucrative) scalability improvements in v5.3 (Waiman Long) - Lockdep irq state tracking flag usage cleanups (Frederic Weisbecker) - static key improvements (Jakub Kicinski, Peter Zijlstra) - misc updates, cleanups and smaller fixes" * 'locking-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (26 commits) locking/lockdep: Remove unnecessary unlikely() locking/static_key: Don't take sleeping locks in __static_key_slow_dec_deferred() locking/static_key: Factor out the fast path of static_key_slow_dec() locking/static_key: Add support for deferred static branches locking/lockdep: Test all incompatible scenarios at once in check_irq_usage() locking/lockdep: Avoid bogus Clang warning locking/lockdep: Generate LOCKF_ bit composites locking/lockdep: Use expanded masks on find_usage_*() functions locking/lockdep: Map remaining magic numbers to lock usage mask names locking/lockdep: Move valid_state() inside CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS && CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING locking/rwsem: Prevent unneeded warning during locking selftest locking/rwsem: Optimize rwsem structure for uncontended lock acquisition locking/rwsem: Enable lock event counting locking/lock_events: Don't show pvqspinlock events on bare metal locking/lock_events: Make lock_events available for all archs & other locks locking/qspinlock_stat: Introduce generic lockevent_*() counting APIs locking/rwsem: Enhance DEBUG_RWSEMS_WARN_ON() macro locking/rwsem: Add debug check for __down_read*() locking/rwsem: Micro-optimize rwsem_try_read_lock_unqueued() locking/rwsem: Move rwsem internal function declarations to rwsem-xadd.h ...
2019-05-06Merge branch 'core-stacktrace-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull stack trace updates from Ingo Molnar: "So Thomas looked at the stacktrace code recently and noticed a few weirdnesses, and we all know how such stories of crummy kernel code meeting German engineering perfection end: a 45-patch series to clean it all up! :-) Here's the changes in Thomas's words: 'Struct stack_trace is a sinkhole for input and output parameters which is largely pointless for most usage sites. In fact if embedded into other data structures it creates indirections and extra storage overhead for no benefit. Looking at all usage sites makes it clear that they just require an interface which is based on a storage array. That array is either on stack, global or embedded into some other data structure. Some of the stack depot usage sites are outright wrong, but fortunately the wrongness just causes more stack being used for nothing and does not have functional impact. Another oddity is the inconsistent termination of the stack trace with ULONG_MAX. It's pointless as the number of entries is what determines the length of the stored trace. In fact quite some call sites remove the ULONG_MAX marker afterwards with or without nasty comments about it. Not all architectures do that and those which do, do it inconsistenly either conditional on nr_entries == 0 or unconditionally. The following series cleans that up by: 1) Removing the ULONG_MAX termination in the architecture code 2) Removing the ULONG_MAX fixups at the call sites 3) Providing plain storage array based interfaces for stacktrace and stackdepot. 4) Cleaning up the mess at the callsites including some related cleanups. 5) Removing the struct stack_trace based interfaces This is not changing the struct stack_trace interfaces at the architecture level, but it removes the exposure to the generic code'" * 'core-stacktrace-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (45 commits) x86/stacktrace: Use common infrastructure stacktrace: Provide common infrastructure lib/stackdepot: Remove obsolete functions stacktrace: Remove obsolete functions livepatch: Simplify stack trace retrieval tracing: Remove the last struct stack_trace usage tracing: Simplify stack trace retrieval tracing: Make ftrace_trace_userstack() static and conditional tracing: Use percpu stack trace buffer more intelligently tracing: Simplify stacktrace retrieval in histograms lockdep: Simplify stack trace handling lockdep: Remove save argument from check_prev_add() lockdep: Remove unused trace argument from print_circular_bug() drm: Simplify stacktrace handling dm persistent data: Simplify stack trace handling dm bufio: Simplify stack trace retrieval btrfs: ref-verify: Simplify stack trace retrieval dma/debug: Simplify stracktrace retrieval fault-inject: Simplify stacktrace retrieval mm/page_owner: Simplify stack trace handling ...
2019-04-29locking/lockdep: Remove unnecessary unlikely()zhengbin
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON() already contains an unlikely(), there is no need for another one. Signed-off-by: zhengbin <zhengbin13@huawei.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: houtao1@huawei.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1556540791-23110-1-git-send-email-zhengbin13@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.51.0) at 2026-10-19 17:40:51 +0000