kernel.git/sound/core, branch linux-4.15.y

ALSA: pcm: potential uninitialized return values

2018-04-08T12:27:33Z

commit 5607dddbfca774fb38bffadcb077fe03aa4ac5c6 upstream. Smatch complains that "tmp" can be uninitialized if we do a zero size write. Fixes: 02a5d6925cd3 ("ALSA: pcm: Avoid potential races between OSS ioctls and read/write") Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter Cc: Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ALSA: pcm: Use dma_bytes as size parameter in dma_mmap_coherent()

2018-04-08T12:27:33Z

commit 9066ae7ff5d89c0b5daa271e2d573540097a94fa upstream. When trying to use the driver (e.g. aplay *.wav), the 4MiB DMA buffer will get mmapp'ed in 16KiB chunks. But this fails with the 2nd 16KiB area, as the page offset is outside of the VMA range (size), which is currently used as size parameter in snd_pcm_lib_default_mmap(). By using the DMA buffer size (dma_bytes) instead, the complete DMA buffer can be mmapp'ed and the issue is fixed. This issue was detected on an ARM platform (TI AM57xx) using the RME HDSP MADI PCIe soundcard. Fixes: 657b1989dacf ("ALSA: pcm - Use dma_mmap_coherent() if available") Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese Cc: Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ALSA: seq: Clear client entry before deleting else at closing

2018-03-21T11:05:43Z

commit a2ff19f7b70118ced291a28d5313469914de451b upstream. When releasing a client, we need to clear the clienttab[] entry at first, then call snd_seq_queue_client_leave(). Otherwise, the in-flight cell in the queue might be picked up by the timer interrupt via snd_seq_check_queue() before calling snd_seq_queue_client_leave(), and it's delivered to another queue while the client is clearing queues. This may eventually result in an uncleared cell remaining in a queue, and the later snd_seq_pool_delete() may need to wait for a long time until the event gets really processed. By moving the clienttab[] clearance at the beginning of release, any event delivery of a cell belonging to this client will fail at a later point, since snd_seq_client_ptr() returns NULL. Thus the cell that was picked up by the timer interrupt will be returned immediately without further delivery, and the long stall of snd_seq_delete_pool() can be avoided, too. Cc: Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ALSA: seq: Fix possible UAF in snd_seq_check_queue()

2018-03-21T11:05:43Z

commit d0f833065221cbfcbadf19fd4102bcfa9330006a upstream. Although we've covered the races between concurrent write() and ioctl() in the previous patch series, there is still a possible UAF in the following scenario: A: user client closed B: timer irq -> snd_seq_release() -> snd_seq_timer_interrupt() -> snd_seq_free_client() -> snd_seq_check_queue() -> cell = snd_seq_prioq_cell_peek() -> snd_seq_prioq_leave() .... removing all cells -> snd_seq_pool_done() .... vfree() -> snd_seq_compare_tick_time(cell) ... Oops So the problem is that a cell is peeked and accessed without any protection until it's retrieved from the queue again via snd_seq_prioq_cell_out(). This patch tries to address it, also cleans up the code by a slight refactoring. snd_seq_prioq_cell_out() now receives an extra pointer argument. When it's non-NULL, the function checks the event timestamp with the given pointer. The caller needs to pass the right reference either to snd_seq_tick or snd_seq_realtime depending on the event timestamp type. A good news is that the above change allows us to remove the snd_seq_prioq_cell_peek(), too, thus the patch actually reduces the code size. Reviewed-by: Nicolai Stange Cc: Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ALSA: pcm: Fix UAF in snd_pcm_oss_get_formats()

2018-03-21T11:05:43Z

commit 01c0b4265cc16bc1f43f475c5944c55c10d5768f upstream. snd_pcm_oss_get_formats() has an obvious use-after-free around snd_mask_test() calls, as spotted by syzbot. The passed format_mask argument is a pointer to the hw_params object that is freed before the loop. What a surprise that it has been present since the original code of decades ago... Reported-by: syzbot+4090700a4f13fccaf648@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Cc: Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ALSA: seq: More protection for concurrent write and ioctl races

2018-03-15T09:56:52Z

commit 7bd80091567789f1c0cb70eb4737aac8bcd2b6b9 upstream. This patch is an attempt for further hardening against races between the concurrent write and ioctls. The previous fix d15d662e89fc ("ALSA: seq: Fix racy pool initializations") covered the race of the pool initialization at writer and the pool resize ioctl by the client->ioctl_mutex (CVE-2018-1000004). However, basically this mutex should be applied more widely to the whole write operation for avoiding the unexpected pool operations by another thread. The only change outside snd_seq_write() is the additional mutex argument to helper functions, so that we can unlock / relock the given mutex temporarily during schedule() call for blocking write. Fixes: d15d662e89fc ("ALSA: seq: Fix racy pool initializations") Reported-by: 范龙飞 Reported-by: Nicolai Stange Reviewed-and-tested-by: Nicolai Stange Cc: Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ALSA: seq: Don't allow resizing pool in use

2018-03-15T09:56:52Z

commit d85739367c6d56e475c281945c68fdb05ca74b4c upstream. This is a fix for a (sort of) fallout in the recent commit d15d662e89fc ("ALSA: seq: Fix racy pool initializations") for CVE-2018-1000004. As the pool resize deletes the existing cells, it may lead to a race when another thread is writing concurrently, eventually resulting a UAF. A simple workaround is not to allow the pool resizing when the pool is in use. It's an invalid behavior in anyway. Fixes: d15d662e89fc ("ALSA: seq: Fix racy pool initializations") Reported-by: 范龙飞 Reported-by: Nicolai Stange Cc: Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ALSA: control: Fix memory corruption risk in snd_ctl_elem_read

2018-03-09T06:47:28Z

commit 5a23699a39abc5328921a81b89383d088f6ba9cc upstream. The patch "ALSA: control: code refactoring for ELEM_READ/ELEM_WRITE operations" introduced a potential for kernel memory corruption due to an incorrect if statement allowing non-readable controls to fall through and call the get function. For TLV controls a driver can omit SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_ACCESS_READ to ensure that only the TLV get function can be called. Instead the normal get() can be invoked unexpectedly and as the driver expects that this will only be called for controls <= 512 bytes, potentially try to copy >512 bytes into the 512 byte return array, so corrupting kernel memory. The problem is an attempt to refactor the snd_ctl_elem_read function to invert the logic so that it conditionally aborted if the control is unreadable instead of conditionally executing. But the if statement wasn't inverted correctly. The correct inversion of if (a && !b) is if (!a || b) Fixes: becf9e5d553c2 ("ALSA: control: code refactoring for ELEM_READ/ELEM_WRITE operations") Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald Cc: Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ALSA: seq: Fix racy pool initializations

2018-02-22T14:40:11Z

commit d15d662e89fc667b90cd294b0eb45694e33144da upstream. ALSA sequencer core initializes the event pool on demand by invoking snd_seq_pool_init() when the first write happens and the pool is empty. Meanwhile user can reset the pool size manually via ioctl concurrently, and this may lead to UAF or out-of-bound accesses since the function tries to vmalloc / vfree the buffer. A simple fix is to just wrap the snd_seq_pool_init() call with the recently introduced client->ioctl_mutex; as the calls for snd_seq_pool_init() from other side are always protected with this mutex, we can avoid the race. Reported-by: 范龙飞 Cc: Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ALSA: seq: Make ioctls race-free

2018-01-11T13:37:51Z

The ALSA sequencer ioctls have no protection against racy calls while the concurrent operations may lead to interfere with each other. As reported recently, for example, the concurrent calls of setting client pool with a combination of write calls may lead to either the unkillable dead-lock or UAF. As a slightly big hammer solution, this patch introduces the mutex to make each ioctl exclusive. Although this may reduce performance via parallel ioctl calls, usually it's not demanded for sequencer usages, hence it should be negligible. Reported-by: Luo Quan Reviewed-by: Kees Cook Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai