kernel.git/sound/core/seq/seq_clientmgr.c, branch linux-3.2.y

ALSA: seq: Clear client entry before deleting else at closing

2018-05-31T23:30:21Z

commit a2ff19f7b70118ced291a28d5313469914de451b upstream. When releasing a client, we need to clear the clienttab[] entry at first, then call snd_seq_queue_client_leave(). Otherwise, the in-flight cell in the queue might be picked up by the timer interrupt via snd_seq_check_queue() before calling snd_seq_queue_client_leave(), and it's delivered to another queue while the client is clearing queues. This may eventually result in an uncleared cell remaining in a queue, and the later snd_seq_pool_delete() may need to wait for a long time until the event gets really processed. By moving the clienttab[] clearance at the beginning of release, any event delivery of a cell belonging to this client will fail at a later point, since snd_seq_client_ptr() returns NULL. Thus the cell that was picked up by the timer interrupt will be returned immediately without further delivery, and the long stall of snd_seq_delete_pool() can be avoided, too. Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

ALSA: seq: More protection for concurrent write and ioctl races

2018-05-31T23:30:02Z

commit 7bd80091567789f1c0cb70eb4737aac8bcd2b6b9 upstream. This patch is an attempt for further hardening against races between the concurrent write and ioctls. The previous fix d15d662e89fc ("ALSA: seq: Fix racy pool initializations") covered the race of the pool initialization at writer and the pool resize ioctl by the client->ioctl_mutex (CVE-2018-1000004). However, basically this mutex should be applied more widely to the whole write operation for avoiding the unexpected pool operations by another thread. The only change outside snd_seq_write() is the additional mutex argument to helper functions, so that we can unlock / relock the given mutex temporarily during schedule() call for blocking write. Fixes: d15d662e89fc ("ALSA: seq: Fix racy pool initializations") Reported-by: 范龙飞 Reported-by: Nicolai Stange Reviewed-and-tested-by: Nicolai Stange Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

ALSA: seq: Don't allow resizing pool in use

2018-05-31T23:30:02Z

commit d85739367c6d56e475c281945c68fdb05ca74b4c upstream. This is a fix for a (sort of) fallout in the recent commit d15d662e89fc ("ALSA: seq: Fix racy pool initializations") for CVE-2018-1000004. As the pool resize deletes the existing cells, it may lead to a race when another thread is writing concurrently, eventually resulting a UAF. A simple workaround is not to allow the pool resizing when the pool is in use. It's an invalid behavior in anyway. Fixes: d15d662e89fc ("ALSA: seq: Fix racy pool initializations") Reported-by: 范龙飞 Reported-by: Nicolai Stange Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

ALSA: seq: Fix racy pool initializations

2018-05-31T23:30:02Z

commit d15d662e89fc667b90cd294b0eb45694e33144da upstream. ALSA sequencer core initializes the event pool on demand by invoking snd_seq_pool_init() when the first write happens and the pool is empty. Meanwhile user can reset the pool size manually via ioctl concurrently, and this may lead to UAF or out-of-bound accesses since the function tries to vmalloc / vfree the buffer. A simple fix is to just wrap the snd_seq_pool_init() call with the recently introduced client->ioctl_mutex; as the calls for snd_seq_pool_init() from other side are always protected with this mutex, we can avoid the race. Reported-by: 范龙飞 Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

ALSA: seq: Fix regression by incorrect ioctl_mutex usages

2018-03-03T15:50:37Z

This is the revised backport of the upstream commit b3defb791b26ea0683a93a4f49c77ec45ec96f10 We had another backport (e.g. 623e5c8ae32b in 4.4.115), but it applies the new mutex also to the code paths that are invoked via faked kernel-to-kernel ioctls. As reported recently, this leads to a deadlock at suspend (or other scenarios triggering the kernel sequencer client). This patch addresses the issue by taking the mutex only in the code paths invoked by user-space, just like the original fix patch does. Reported-and-tested-by: Andres Bertens Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

ALSA: seq: Make ioctls race-free

2018-02-13T18:32:22Z

commit b3defb791b26ea0683a93a4f49c77ec45ec96f10 upstream. The ALSA sequencer ioctls have no protection against racy calls while the concurrent operations may lead to interfere with each other. As reported recently, for example, the concurrent calls of setting client pool with a combination of write calls may lead to either the unkillable dead-lock or UAF. As a slightly big hammer solution, this patch introduces the mutex to make each ioctl exclusive. Although this may reduce performance via parallel ioctl calls, usually it's not demanded for sequencer usages, hence it should be negligible. Reported-by: Luo Quan Reviewed-by: Kees Cook Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai [bwh: Backported to 3.2: ioctl dispatch is done from snd_seq_do_ioctl(); take the mutex and add ret variable there.] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

ALSA: seq: Fix nested rwsem annotation for lockdep splat

2018-01-01T20:51:00Z

commit 1f20f9ff57ca23b9f5502fca85ce3977e8496cb1 upstream. syzkaller reported the lockdep splat due to the possible deadlock of grp->list_mutex of each sequencer client object. Actually this is rather a false-positive report due to the missing nested lock annotations. The sequencer client may deliver the event directly to another client which takes another own lock. For addressing this issue, this patch replaces the simple down_read() with down_read_nested(). As a lock subclass, the already existing "hop" can be re-used, which indicates the depth of the call. Reference: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/089e082686ac9b482e055c832617@google.com Reported-by: syzbot Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

ALSA: seq: Fix use-after-free at creating a port

2017-11-11T13:34:38Z

commit 71105998845fb012937332fe2e806d443c09e026 upstream. There is a potential race window opened at creating and deleting a port via ioctl, as spotted by fuzzing. snd_seq_create_port() creates a port object and returns its pointer, but it doesn't take the refcount, thus it can be deleted immediately by another thread. Meanwhile, snd_seq_ioctl_create_port() still calls the function snd_seq_system_client_ev_port_start() with the created port object that is being deleted, and this triggers use-after-free like: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in snd_seq_ioctl_create_port+0x504/0x630 [snd_seq] at addr ffff8801f2241cb1 ============================================================================= BUG kmalloc-512 (Tainted: G B ): kasan: bad access detected ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- INFO: Allocated in snd_seq_create_port+0x94/0x9b0 [snd_seq] age=1 cpu=3 pid=4511 ___slab_alloc+0x425/0x460 __slab_alloc+0x20/0x40 kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x150/0x190 snd_seq_create_port+0x94/0x9b0 [snd_seq] snd_seq_ioctl_create_port+0xd1/0x630 [snd_seq] snd_seq_do_ioctl+0x11c/0x190 [snd_seq] snd_seq_ioctl+0x40/0x80 [snd_seq] do_vfs_ioctl+0x54b/0xda0 SyS_ioctl+0x79/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x75 INFO: Freed in port_delete+0x136/0x1a0 [snd_seq] age=1 cpu=2 pid=4717 __slab_free+0x204/0x310 kfree+0x15f/0x180 port_delete+0x136/0x1a0 [snd_seq] snd_seq_delete_port+0x235/0x350 [snd_seq] snd_seq_ioctl_delete_port+0xc8/0x180 [snd_seq] snd_seq_do_ioctl+0x11c/0x190 [snd_seq] snd_seq_ioctl+0x40/0x80 [snd_seq] do_vfs_ioctl+0x54b/0xda0 SyS_ioctl+0x79/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x75 Call Trace: [] dump_stack+0x63/0x82 [] print_trailer+0xfb/0x160 [] object_err+0x34/0x40 [] kasan_report.part.2+0x223/0x520 [] ? snd_seq_ioctl_create_port+0x504/0x630 [snd_seq] [] __asan_report_load1_noabort+0x2e/0x30 [] snd_seq_ioctl_create_port+0x504/0x630 [snd_seq] [] ? snd_seq_ioctl_delete_port+0x180/0x180 [snd_seq] [] ? taskstats_exit+0xbc0/0xbc0 [] snd_seq_do_ioctl+0x11c/0x190 [snd_seq] [] snd_seq_ioctl+0x40/0x80 [snd_seq] [] ? acct_account_cputime+0x63/0x80 [] do_vfs_ioctl+0x54b/0xda0 ..... We may fix this in a few different ways, and in this patch, it's fixed simply by taking the refcount properly at snd_seq_create_port() and letting the caller unref the object after use. Also, there is another potential use-after-free by sprintf() call in snd_seq_create_port(), and this is moved inside the lock. This fix covers CVE-2017-15265. Reported-and-tested-by: Michael23 Yu Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai [bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

ALSA: seq: Fix racy cell insertions during snd_seq_pool_done()

2017-07-18T17:38:36Z

commit c520ff3d03f0b5db7146d9beed6373ad5d2a5e0e upstream. When snd_seq_pool_done() is called, it marks the closing flag to refuse the further cell insertions. But snd_seq_pool_done() itself doesn't clear the cells but just waits until all cells are cleared by the caller side. That is, it's racy, and this leads to the endless stall as syzkaller spotted. This patch addresses the racy by splitting the setup of pool->closing flag out of snd_seq_pool_done(), and calling it properly before snd_seq_pool_done(). BugLink: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CACT4Y+aqqy8bZA1fFieifNxR2fAfFQQABcBHj801+u5ePV0URw@mail.gmail.com Reported-and-tested-by: Dmitry Vyukov Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

ALSA: seq: Fix lockdep warnings due to double mutex locks

2016-02-27T14:28:46Z

commit 7f0973e973cd74aa40747c9d38844560cd184ee8 upstream. The port subscription code uses double mutex locks for source and destination ports, and this may become racy once when wrongly set up. It leads to lockdep warning splat, typically triggered by fuzzer like syzkaller, although the actual deadlock hasn't been seen, so far. This patch simplifies the handling by reducing to two single locks, so that no lockdep warning will be trigger any longer. By splitting to two actions, a still-in-progress element shall be added in one list while handling another. For ignoring this element, a new check is added in deliver_to_subscribers(). Along with it, the code to add/remove the subscribers list element was cleaned up and refactored. BugLink: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CACT4Y+aKQXV7xkBW9hpQbzaDO7LrUvohxWh-UwMxXjDy-yBD=A@mail.gmail.com Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov Tested-by: Dmitry Vyukov Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings