kernel.git/mm/page_isolation.c, branch linux-5.7.y

mm: add function __putback_isolated_page

2020-04-07T17:43:38Z

There are cases where we would benefit from avoiding having to go through the allocation and free cycle to return an isolated page. Examples for this might include page poisoning in which we isolate a page and then put it back in the free list without ever having actually allocated it. This will enable us to also avoid notifiers for the future free page reporting which will need to avoid retriggering page reporting when returning pages that have been reported on. Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Acked-by: David Hildenbrand Acked-by: Mel Gorman Cc: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Dan Williams Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: Luiz Capitulino Cc: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Nitesh Narayan Lal Cc: Oscar Salvador Cc: Pankaj Gupta Cc: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Rik van Riel Cc: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Wei Wang Cc: Yang Zhang Cc: wei qi Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211224624.29318.89287.stgit@localhost.localdomain Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm/page_isolation: fix potential warning from user

2020-01-31T18:30:39Z

It makes sense to call the WARN_ON_ONCE(zone_idx(zone) == ZONE_MOVABLE) from start_isolate_page_range(), but should avoid triggering it from userspace, i.e, from is_mem_section_removable() because it could crash the system by a non-root user if warn_on_panic is set. While at it, simplify the code a bit by removing an unnecessary jump label. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200120163915.1469-1-cai@lca.pw Signed-off-by: Qian Cai Suggested-by: Michal Hocko Acked-by: Michal Hocko Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm/hotplug: silence a lockdep splat with printk()

2020-01-31T18:30:39Z

It is not that hard to trigger lockdep splats by calling printk from under zone->lock. Most of them are false positives caused by lock chains introduced early in the boot process and they do not cause any real problems (although most of the early boot lock dependencies could happen after boot as well). There are some console drivers which do allocate from the printk context as well and those should be fixed. In any case, false positives are not that trivial to workaround and it is far from optimal to lose lockdep functionality for something that is a non-issue. So change has_unmovable_pages() so that it no longer calls dump_page() itself - instead it returns a "struct page *" of the unmovable page back to the caller so that in the case of a has_unmovable_pages() failure, the caller can call dump_page() after releasing zone->lock. Also, make dump_page() is able to report a CMA page as well, so the reason string from has_unmovable_pages() can be removed. Even though has_unmovable_pages doesn't hold any reference to the returned page this should be reasonably safe for the purpose of reporting the page (dump_page) because it cannot be hotremoved in the context of memory unplug. The state of the page might change but that is the case even with the existing code as zone->lock only plays role for free pages. While at it, remove a similar but unnecessary debug-only printk() as well. A sample of one of those lockdep splats is, WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected ------------------------------------------------------ test.sh/8653 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffff865a4460 (console_owner){-.-.}, at: console_unlock+0x207/0x750 but task is already holding lock: ffff88883fff3c58 (&(&zone->lock)->rlock){-.-.}, at: __offline_isolated_pages+0x179/0x3e0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (&(&zone->lock)->rlock){-.-.}: __lock_acquire+0x5b3/0xb40 lock_acquire+0x126/0x280 _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 rmqueue_bulk.constprop.21+0xb6/0x1160 get_page_from_freelist+0x898/0x22c0 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x2f3/0x1cd0 alloc_pages_current+0x9c/0x110 allocate_slab+0x4c6/0x19c0 new_slab+0x46/0x70 ___slab_alloc+0x58b/0x960 __slab_alloc+0x43/0x70 __kmalloc+0x3ad/0x4b0 __tty_buffer_request_room+0x100/0x250 tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag+0x67/0x110 pty_write+0xa2/0xf0 n_tty_write+0x36b/0x7b0 tty_write+0x284/0x4c0 __vfs_write+0x50/0xa0 vfs_write+0x105/0x290 redirected_tty_write+0x6a/0xc0 do_iter_write+0x248/0x2a0 vfs_writev+0x106/0x1e0 do_writev+0xd4/0x180 __x64_sys_writev+0x45/0x50 do_syscall_64+0xcc/0x76c entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe -> #2 (&(&port->lock)->rlock){-.-.}: __lock_acquire+0x5b3/0xb40 lock_acquire+0x126/0x280 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3a/0x50 tty_port_tty_get+0x20/0x60 tty_port_default_wakeup+0xf/0x30 tty_port_tty_wakeup+0x39/0x40 uart_write_wakeup+0x2a/0x40 serial8250_tx_chars+0x22e/0x440 serial8250_handle_irq.part.8+0x14a/0x170 serial8250_default_handle_irq+0x5c/0x90 serial8250_interrupt+0xa6/0x130 __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x78/0x4f0 handle_irq_event_percpu+0x70/0x100 handle_irq_event+0x5a/0x8b handle_edge_irq+0x117/0x370 do_IRQ+0x9e/0x1e0 ret_from_intr+0x0/0x2a cpuidle_enter_state+0x156/0x8e0 cpuidle_enter+0x41/0x70 call_cpuidle+0x5e/0x90 do_idle+0x333/0x370 cpu_startup_entry+0x1d/0x1f start_secondary+0x290/0x330 secondary_startup_64+0xb6/0xc0 -> #1 (&port_lock_key){-.-.}: __lock_acquire+0x5b3/0xb40 lock_acquire+0x126/0x280 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3a/0x50 serial8250_console_write+0x3e4/0x450 univ8250_console_write+0x4b/0x60 console_unlock+0x501/0x750 vprintk_emit+0x10d/0x340 vprintk_default+0x1f/0x30 vprintk_func+0x44/0xd4 printk+0x9f/0xc5 -> #0 (console_owner){-.-.}: check_prev_add+0x107/0xea0 validate_chain+0x8fc/0x1200 __lock_acquire+0x5b3/0xb40 lock_acquire+0x126/0x280 console_unlock+0x269/0x750 vprintk_emit+0x10d/0x340 vprintk_default+0x1f/0x30 vprintk_func+0x44/0xd4 printk+0x9f/0xc5 __offline_isolated_pages.cold.52+0x2f/0x30a offline_isolated_pages_cb+0x17/0x30 walk_system_ram_range+0xda/0x160 __offline_pages+0x79c/0xa10 offline_pages+0x11/0x20 memory_subsys_offline+0x7e/0xc0 device_offline+0xd5/0x110 state_store+0xc6/0xe0 dev_attr_store+0x3f/0x60 sysfs_kf_write+0x89/0xb0 kernfs_fop_write+0x188/0x240 __vfs_write+0x50/0xa0 vfs_write+0x105/0x290 ksys_write+0xc6/0x160 __x64_sys_write+0x43/0x50 do_syscall_64+0xcc/0x76c entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: console_owner --> &(&port->lock)->rlock --> &(&zone->lock)->rlock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&(&zone->lock)->rlock); lock(&(&port->lock)->rlock); lock(&(&zone->lock)->rlock); lock(console_owner); *** DEADLOCK *** 9 locks held by test.sh/8653: #0: ffff88839ba7d408 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}, at: vfs_write+0x25f/0x290 #1: ffff888277618880 (&of->mutex){+.+.}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0x128/0x240 #2: ffff8898131fc218 (kn->count#115){.+.+}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0x138/0x240 #3: ffffffff86962a80 (device_hotplug_lock){+.+.}, at: lock_device_hotplug_sysfs+0x16/0x50 #4: ffff8884374f4990 (&dev->mutex){....}, at: device_offline+0x70/0x110 #5: ffffffff86515250 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}, at: __offline_pages+0xbf/0xa10 #6: ffffffff867405f0 (mem_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}, at: percpu_down_write+0x87/0x2f0 #7: ffff88883fff3c58 (&(&zone->lock)->rlock){-.-.}, at: __offline_isolated_pages+0x179/0x3e0 #8: ffffffff865a4920 (console_lock){+.+.}, at: vprintk_emit+0x100/0x340 stack backtrace: Hardware name: HPE ProLiant DL560 Gen10/ProLiant DL560 Gen10, BIOS U34 05/21/2019 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x86/0xca print_circular_bug.cold.31+0x243/0x26e check_noncircular+0x29e/0x2e0 check_prev_add+0x107/0xea0 validate_chain+0x8fc/0x1200 __lock_acquire+0x5b3/0xb40 lock_acquire+0x126/0x280 console_unlock+0x269/0x750 vprintk_emit+0x10d/0x340 vprintk_default+0x1f/0x30 vprintk_func+0x44/0xd4 printk+0x9f/0xc5 __offline_isolated_pages.cold.52+0x2f/0x30a offline_isolated_pages_cb+0x17/0x30 walk_system_ram_range+0xda/0x160 __offline_pages+0x79c/0xa10 offline_pages+0x11/0x20 memory_subsys_offline+0x7e/0xc0 device_offline+0xd5/0x110 state_store+0xc6/0xe0 dev_attr_store+0x3f/0x60 sysfs_kf_write+0x89/0xb0 kernfs_fop_write+0x188/0x240 __vfs_write+0x50/0xa0 vfs_write+0x105/0x290 ksys_write+0xc6/0x160 __x64_sys_write+0x43/0x50 do_syscall_64+0xcc/0x76c entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200117181200.20299-1-cai@lca.pw Signed-off-by: Qian Cai Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky Cc: Petr Mladek Cc: Steven Rostedt (VMware) Cc: Peter Zijlstra Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm: remove "count" parameter from has_unmovable_pages()

2020-01-31T18:30:38Z

Now that the memory isolate notifier is gone, the parameter is always 0. Drop it and cleanup has_unmovable_pages(). Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191114131911.11783-3-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand Acked-by: Michal Hocko Cc: Oscar Salvador Cc: Anshuman Khandual Cc: Qian Cai Cc: Pingfan Liu Cc: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Dan Williams Cc: Pavel Tatashin Cc: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Mike Rapoport Cc: Wei Yang Cc: Alexander Duyck Cc: Alexander Potapenko Cc: Arun KS Cc: Michael Ellerman Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm: remove the memory isolate notifier

2020-01-31T18:30:38Z

Luckily, we have no users left, so we can get rid of it. Cleanup set_migratetype_isolate() a little bit. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191114131911.11783-2-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Acked-by: Michal Hocko Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Pavel Tatashin Cc: Dan Williams Cc: Oscar Salvador Cc: Qian Cai Cc: Anshuman Khandual Cc: Pingfan Liu Cc: Michael Ellerman Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm/page_isolation.c: convert SKIP_HWPOISON to MEMORY_OFFLINE

2019-12-01T20:59:04Z

We have two types of users of page isolation: 1. Memory offlining: Offline memory so it can be unplugged. Memory won't be touched. 2. Memory allocation: Allocate memory (e.g., alloc_contig_range()) to become the owner of the memory and make use of it. For example, in case we want to offline memory, we can ignore (skip over) PageHWPoison() pages, as the memory won't get used. We can allow to offline memory. In contrast, we don't want to allow to allocate such memory. Let's generalize the approach so we can special case other types of pages we want to skip over in case we offline memory. While at it, also pass the same flags to test_pages_isolated(). Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191021172353.3056-3-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand Suggested-by: Michal Hocko Acked-by: Michal Hocko Cc: Oscar Salvador Cc: Anshuman Khandual Cc: David Hildenbrand Cc: Pingfan Liu Cc: Qian Cai Cc: Pavel Tatashin Cc: Dan Williams Cc: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Mike Rapoport Cc: Alexander Duyck Cc: Mike Rapoport Cc: Pavel Tatashin Cc: Wei Yang Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm/page_isolation.c: change the prototype of undo_isolate_page_range()

2019-07-12T18:05:43Z

undo_isolate_page_range() never fails, so no need to return value. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1562075604-8979-1-git-send-email-kernelfans@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu Acked-by: Michal Hocko Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual Cc: Qian Cai Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm/page_isolation.c: remove redundant pfn_valid_within() in __first_valid_page()

2019-05-14T16:47:46Z

pfn_valid_within() calls pfn_valid() when CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE making it redundant for both definitions (w/wo CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG) of the helper pfn_to_online_page() which either calls pfn_valid() or pfn_valid_within(). pfn_valid_within() being 1 when !CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE is irrelevant either way. This does not change functionality. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1553141595-26907-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual Reviewed-by: Zi Yan Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador Acked-by: Michal Hocko Cc: Mike Kravetz Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm/page_isolation.c: fix a wrong flag in set_migratetype_isolate()

2019-03-29T17:01:37Z

Due to has_unmovable_pages() taking an incorrect irqsave flag instead of the isolation flag in set_migratetype_isolate(), there are issues with HWPOSION and error reporting where dump_page() is not called when there is an unmovable page. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190320204941.53731-1-cai@lca.pw Fixes: d381c54760dc ("mm: only report isolation failures when offlining memory") Acked-by: Michal Hocko Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador Signed-off-by: Qian Cai Cc: [5.0.x] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm/hotplug: fix offline undo_isolate_page_range()

2019-03-29T17:01:37Z

Commit f1dd2cd13c4b ("mm, memory_hotplug: do not associate hotadded memory to zones until online") introduced move_pfn_range_to_zone() which calls memmap_init_zone() during onlining a memory block. memmap_init_zone() will reset pagetype flags and makes migrate type to be MOVABLE. However, in __offline_pages(), it also call undo_isolate_page_range() after offline_isolated_pages() to do the same thing. Due to commit 2ce13640b3f4 ("mm: __first_valid_page skip over offline pages") changed __first_valid_page() to skip offline pages, undo_isolate_page_range() here just waste CPU cycles looping around the offlining PFN range while doing nothing, because __first_valid_page() will return NULL as offline_isolated_pages() has already marked all memory sections within the pfn range as offline via offline_mem_sections(). Also, after calling the "useless" undo_isolate_page_range() here, it reaches the point of no returning by notifying MEM_OFFLINE. Those pages will be marked as MIGRATE_MOVABLE again once onlining. The only thing left to do is to decrease the number of isolated pageblocks zone counter which would make some paths of the page allocation slower that the above commit introduced. Even if alloc_contig_range() can be used to isolate 16GB-hugetlb pages on ppc64, an "int" should still be enough to represent the number of pageblocks there. Fix an incorrect comment along the way. [cai@lca.pw: v4] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190314150641.59358-1-cai@lca.pw Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190313143133.46200-1-cai@lca.pw Fixes: 2ce13640b3f4 ("mm: __first_valid_page skip over offline pages") Signed-off-by: Qian Cai Acked-by: Michal Hocko Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador Cc: Vlastimil Babka Cc: [4.13+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds