kernel.git/mm/mprotect.c, branch linux-5.19.y

mm/uffd: fix warning without PTE_MARKER_UFFD_WP compiled in

2022-10-24T07:56:48Z

commit 515778e2d790652a38a24554fdb7f21420d91efc upstream. When PTE_MARKER_UFFD_WP not configured, it's still possible to reach pte marker code and trigger an warning. Add a few CONFIG_PTE_MARKER_UFFD_WP ifdefs to make sure the code won't be reached when not compiled in. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YzeR+R6b4bwBlBHh@x1n Fixes: b1f9e876862d ("mm/uffd: enable write protection for shmem & hugetlbfs") Signed-off-by: Peter Xu Reported-by: Cc: Axel Rasmussen Cc: Brian Geffon Cc: Edward Liaw Cc: Liu Shixin Cc: Mike Kravetz Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm/mprotect: only reference swap pfn page if type match

2022-08-31T15:18:15Z

commit 3d2f78f08cd8388035ac375e731ec1ac1b79b09d upstream. Yu Zhao reported a bug after the commit "mm/swap: Add swp_offset_pfn() to fetch PFN from swap entry" added a check in swp_offset_pfn() for swap type [1]: kernel BUG at include/linux/swapops.h:117! CPU: 46 PID: 5245 Comm: EventManager_De Tainted: G S O L 6.0.0-dbg-DEV #2 RIP: 0010:pfn_swap_entry_to_page+0x72/0xf0 Code: c6 48 8b 36 48 83 fe ff 74 53 48 01 d1 48 83 c1 08 48 8b 09 f6 c1 01 75 7b 66 90 48 89 c1 48 8b 09 f6 c1 01 74 74 5d c3 eb 9e <0f> 0b 48 ba ff ff ff ff 03 00 00 00 eb ae a9 ff 0f 00 00 75 13 48 RSP: 0018:ffffa59e73fabb80 EFLAGS: 00010282 RAX: 00000000ffffffe8 RBX: 0c00000000000000 RCX: ffffcd5440000000 RDX: 1ffffffffff7a80a RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0c0000000000042b RBP: ffffa59e73fabb80 R08: ffff9965ca6e8bb8 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffffffffa5a2f62d R11: 0000030b372e9fff R12: ffff997b79db5738 R13: 000000000000042b R14: 0c0000000000042b R15: 1ffffffffff7a80a FS: 00007f549d1bb700(0000) GS:ffff99d3cf680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000440d035b3180 CR3: 0000002243176004 CR4: 00000000003706e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: change_pte_range+0x36e/0x880 change_p4d_range+0x2e8/0x670 change_protection_range+0x14e/0x2c0 mprotect_fixup+0x1ee/0x330 do_mprotect_pkey+0x34c/0x440 __x64_sys_mprotect+0x1d/0x30 It triggers because pfn_swap_entry_to_page() could be called upon e.g. a genuine swap entry. Fix it by only calling it when it's a write migration entry where the page* is used. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAOUHufaVC2Za-p8m0aiHw6YkheDcrO-C3wRGixwDS32VTS+k1w@mail.gmail.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220823221138.45602-1-peterx@redhat.com Fixes: 6c287605fd56 ("mm: remember exclusively mapped anonymous pages with PG_anon_exclusive") Signed-off-by: Peter Xu Reported-by: Yu Zhao Tested-by: Yu Zhao Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand Cc: "Huang, Ying" Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm/hugetlb: handle UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT

2022-05-13T14:20:11Z

This starts from passing cp_flags into hugetlb_change_protection() so hugetlb will be able to handle MM_CP_UFFD_WP[_RESOLVE] requests. huge_pte_clear_uffd_wp() is introduced to handle the case where the UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT is requested upon migrating huge page entries. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405014906.14708-1-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Peter Xu Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz Cc: Alistair Popple Cc: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Axel Rasmussen Cc: David Hildenbrand Cc: Hugh Dickins Cc: Jerome Glisse Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" Cc: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Mike Rapoport Cc: Nadav Amit Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton

mm/shmem: allows file-back mem to be uffd wr-protected on thps

2022-05-13T14:20:10Z

We don't have "huge" version of pte markers, instead when necessary we split the thp. However split the thp is not enough, because file-backed thp is handled totally differently comparing to anonymous thps: rather than doing a real split, the thp pmd will simply got cleared in __split_huge_pmd_locked(). That is not enough if e.g. when there is a thp covers range [0, 2M) but we want to wr-protect small page resides in [4K, 8K) range, because after __split_huge_pmd() returns, there will be a none pmd, and change_pmd_range() will just skip it right after the split. Here we leverage the previously introduced change_pmd_prepare() macro so that we'll populate the pmd with a pgtable page after the pmd split (in which process the pmd will be cleared for cases like shmem). Then change_pte_range() will do all the rest for us by installing the uffd-wp pte marker at any none pte that we'd like to wr-protect. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405014852.14413-1-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Peter Xu Cc: Alistair Popple Cc: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Axel Rasmussen Cc: David Hildenbrand Cc: Hugh Dickins Cc: Jerome Glisse Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" Cc: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Mike Kravetz Cc: Mike Rapoport Cc: Nadav Amit Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton

mm/shmem: allow uffd wr-protect none pte for file-backed mem

2022-05-13T14:20:10Z

File-backed memory differs from anonymous memory in that even if the pte is missing, the data could still resides either in the file or in page/swap cache. So when wr-protect a pte, we need to consider none ptes too. We do that by installing the uffd-wp pte markers when necessary. So when there's a future write to the pte, the fault handler will go the special path to first fault-in the page as read-only, then report to userfaultfd server with the wr-protect message. On the other hand, when unprotecting a page, it's also possible that the pte got unmapped but replaced by the special uffd-wp marker. Then we'll need to be able to recover from a uffd-wp pte marker into a none pte, so that the next access to the page will fault in correctly as usual when accessed the next time. Special care needs to be taken throughout the change_protection_range() process. Since now we allow user to wr-protect a none pte, we need to be able to pre-populate the page table entries if we see (!anonymous && MM_CP_UFFD_WP) requests, otherwise change_protection_range() will always skip when the pgtable entry does not exist. For example, the pgtable can be missing for a whole chunk of 2M pmd, but the page cache can exist for the 2M range. When we want to wr-protect one 4K page within the 2M pmd range, we need to pre-populate the pgtable and install the pte marker showing that we want to get a message and block the thread when the page cache of that 4K page is written. Without pre-populating the pmd, change_protection() will simply skip that whole pmd. Note that this patch only covers the small pages (pte level) but not covering any of the transparent huge pages yet. That will be done later, and this patch will be a preparation for it too. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405014850.14352-1-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Peter Xu Cc: Alistair Popple Cc: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Axel Rasmussen Cc: David Hildenbrand Cc: Hugh Dickins Cc: Jerome Glisse Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" Cc: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Mike Kravetz Cc: Mike Rapoport Cc: Nadav Amit Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton

mm: teach core mm about pte markers

2022-05-13T14:20:09Z

This patch still does not use pte marker in any way, however it teaches the core mm about the pte marker idea. For example, handle_pte_marker() is introduced that will parse and handle all the pte marker faults. Many of the places are more about commenting it up - so that we know there's the possibility of pte marker showing up, and why we don't need special code for the cases. [peterx@redhat.com: userfaultfd.c needs swapops.h] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YmRlVj3cdizYJsr0@xz-m1.local Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405014833.14015-1-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Peter Xu Cc: Alistair Popple Cc: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Axel Rasmussen Cc: David Hildenbrand Cc: Hugh Dickins Cc: Jerome Glisse Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" Cc: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Mike Kravetz Cc: Mike Rapoport Cc: Nadav Amit Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton

mm/mprotect: do not flush when not required architecturally

2022-05-13T14:20:05Z

Currently, using mprotect() to unprotect a memory region or uffd to unprotect a memory region causes a TLB flush. However, in such cases the PTE is often not modified (i.e., remain RO) and therefore not TLB flush is needed. Add an arch-specific pte_needs_flush() which tells whether a TLB flush is needed based on the old PTE and the new one. Implement an x86 pte_needs_flush(). Always flush the TLB when it is architecturally needed even when skipping a TLB flush might only result in a spurious page-faults by skipping the flush. Even with such conservative manner, we can in the future further refine the checks to test whether a PTE is present by only considering the architectural _PAGE_PRESENT flag instead of {pte|pmd}_preesnt(). For not be careful and use the latter. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220401180821.1986781-3-namit@vmware.com Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit Cc: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Will Deacon Cc: Yu Zhao Cc: Nick Piggin Cc: Andrew Cooper Cc: Peter Xu Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton

mm/mprotect: use mmu_gather

2022-05-13T14:20:05Z

Patch series "mm/mprotect: avoid unnecessary TLB flushes", v6. This patchset is intended to remove unnecessary TLB flushes during mprotect() syscalls. Once this patch-set make it through, similar and further optimizations for MADV_COLD and userfaultfd would be possible. Basically, there are 3 optimizations in this patch-set: 1. Use TLB batching infrastructure to batch flushes across VMAs and do better/fewer flushes. This would also be handy for later userfaultfd enhancements. 2. Avoid unnecessary TLB flushes. This optimization is the one that provides most of the performance benefits. Unlike previous versions, we now only avoid flushes that would not result in spurious page-faults. 3. Avoiding TLB flushes on change_huge_pmd() that are only needed to prevent the A/D bits from changing. Andrew asked for some benchmark numbers. I do not have an easy determinate macrobenchmark in which it is easy to show benefit. I therefore ran a microbenchmark: a loop that does the following on anonymous memory, just as a sanity check to see that time is saved by avoiding TLB flushes. The loop goes: mprotect(p, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_READ) mprotect(p, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE) *p = 0; // make the page writable The test was run in KVM guest with 1 or 2 threads (the second thread was busy-looping). I measured the time (cycles) of each operation: 1 thread 2 threads mmots +patch mmots +patch PROT_READ 3494 2725 (-22%) 8630 7788 (-10%) PROT_READ|WRITE 3952 2724 (-31%) 9075 2865 (-68%) [ mmots = v5.17-rc6-mmots-2022-03-06-20-38 ] The exact numbers are really meaningless, but the benefit is clear. There are 2 interesting results though. (1) PROT_READ is cheaper, while one can expect it not to be affected. This is presumably due to TLB miss that is saved (2) Without memory access (*p = 0), the speedup of the patch is even greater. In that scenario mprotect(PROT_READ) also avoids the TLB flush. As a result both operations on the patched kernel take roughly ~1500 cycles (with either 1 or 2 threads), whereas on mmotm their cost is as high as presented in the table. This patch (of 3): change_pXX_range() currently does not use mmu_gather, but instead implements its own deferred TLB flushes scheme. This both complicates the code, as developers need to be aware of different invalidation schemes, and prevents opportunities to avoid TLB flushes or perform them in finer granularity. The use of mmu_gather for modified PTEs has benefits in various scenarios even if pages are not released. For instance, if only a single page needs to be flushed out of a range of many pages, only that page would be flushed. If a THP page is flushed, on x86 a single TLB invlpg instruction can be used instead of 512 instructions (or a full TLB flush, which would Linux would actually use by default). mprotect() over multiple VMAs requires a single flush. Use mmu_gather in change_pXX_range(). As the pages are not released, only record the flushed range using tlb_flush_pXX_range(). Handle THP similarly and get rid of flush_cache_range() which becomes redundant since tlb_start_vma() calls it when needed. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220401180821.1986781-1-namit@vmware.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220401180821.1986781-2-namit@vmware.com Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Andrew Cooper Cc: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: Peter Xu Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Will Deacon Cc: Yu Zhao Cc: Nick Piggin Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton

mm: remember exclusively mapped anonymous pages with PG_anon_exclusive

2022-05-10T01:20:44Z

Let's mark exclusively mapped anonymous pages with PG_anon_exclusive as exclusive, and use that information to make GUP pins reliable and stay consistent with the page mapped into the page table even if the page table entry gets write-protected. With that information at hand, we can extend our COW logic to always reuse anonymous pages that are exclusive. For anonymous pages that might be shared, the existing logic applies. As already documented, PG_anon_exclusive is usually only expressive in combination with a page table entry. Especially PTE vs. PMD-mapped anonymous pages require more thought, some examples: due to mremap() we can easily have a single compound page PTE-mapped into multiple page tables exclusively in a single process -- multiple page table locks apply. Further, due to MADV_WIPEONFORK we might not necessarily write-protect all PTEs, and only some subpages might be pinned. Long story short: once PTE-mapped, we have to track information about exclusivity per sub-page, but until then, we can just track it for the compound page in the head page and not having to update a whole bunch of subpages all of the time for a simple PMD mapping of a THP. For simplicity, this commit mostly talks about "anonymous pages", while it's for THP actually "the part of an anonymous folio referenced via a page table entry". To not spill PG_anon_exclusive code all over the mm code-base, we let the anon rmap code to handle all PG_anon_exclusive logic it can easily handle. If a writable, present page table entry points at an anonymous (sub)page, that (sub)page must be PG_anon_exclusive. If GUP wants to take a reliably pin (FOLL_PIN) on an anonymous page references via a present page table entry, it must only pin if PG_anon_exclusive is set for the mapped (sub)page. This commit doesn't adjust GUP, so this is only implicitly handled for FOLL_WRITE, follow-up commits will teach GUP to also respect it for FOLL_PIN without FOLL_WRITE, to make all GUP pins of anonymous pages fully reliable. Whenever an anonymous page is to be shared (fork(), KSM), or when temporarily unmapping an anonymous page (swap, migration), the relevant PG_anon_exclusive bit has to be cleared to mark the anonymous page possibly shared. Clearing will fail if there are GUP pins on the page: * For fork(), this means having to copy the page and not being able to share it. fork() protects against concurrent GUP using the PT lock and the src_mm->write_protect_seq. * For KSM, this means sharing will fail. For swap this means, unmapping will fail, For migration this means, migration will fail early. All three cases protect against concurrent GUP using the PT lock and a proper clear/invalidate+flush of the relevant page table entry. This fixes memory corruptions reported for FOLL_PIN | FOLL_WRITE, when a pinned page gets mapped R/O and the successive write fault ends up replacing the page instead of reusing it. It improves the situation for O_DIRECT/vmsplice/... that still use FOLL_GET instead of FOLL_PIN, if fork() is *not* involved, however swapout and fork() are still problematic. Properly using FOLL_PIN instead of FOLL_GET for these GUP users will fix the issue for them. I. Details about basic handling I.1. Fresh anonymous pages page_add_new_anon_rmap() and hugepage_add_new_anon_rmap() will mark the given page exclusive via __page_set_anon_rmap(exclusive=1). As that is the mechanism fresh anonymous pages come into life (besides migration code where we copy the page->mapping), all fresh anonymous pages will start out as exclusive. I.2. COW reuse handling of anonymous pages When a COW handler stumbles over a (sub)page that's marked exclusive, it simply reuses it. Otherwise, the handler tries harder under page lock to detect if the (sub)page is exclusive and can be reused. If exclusive, page_move_anon_rmap() will mark the given (sub)page exclusive. Note that hugetlb code does not yet check for PageAnonExclusive(), as it still uses the old COW logic that is prone to the COW security issue because hugetlb code cannot really tolerate unnecessary/wrong COW as huge pages are a scarce resource. I.3. Migration handling try_to_migrate() has to try marking an exclusive anonymous page shared via page_try_share_anon_rmap(). If it fails because there are GUP pins on the page, unmap fails. migrate_vma_collect_pmd() and __split_huge_pmd_locked() are handled similarly. Writable migration entries implicitly point at shared anonymous pages. For readable migration entries that information is stored via a new "readable-exclusive" migration entry, specific to anonymous pages. When restoring a migration entry in remove_migration_pte(), information about exlusivity is detected via the migration entry type, and RMAP_EXCLUSIVE is set accordingly for page_add_anon_rmap()/hugepage_add_anon_rmap() to restore that information. I.4. Swapout handling try_to_unmap() has to try marking the mapped page possibly shared via page_try_share_anon_rmap(). If it fails because there are GUP pins on the page, unmap fails. For now, information about exclusivity is lost. In the future, we might want to remember that information in the swap entry in some cases, however, it requires more thought, care, and a way to store that information in swap entries. I.5. Swapin handling do_swap_page() will never stumble over exclusive anonymous pages in the swap cache, as try_to_migrate() prohibits that. do_swap_page() always has to detect manually if an anonymous page is exclusive and has to set RMAP_EXCLUSIVE for page_add_anon_rmap() accordingly. I.6. THP handling __split_huge_pmd_locked() has to move the information about exclusivity from the PMD to the PTEs. a) In case we have a readable-exclusive PMD migration entry, simply insert readable-exclusive PTE migration entries. b) In case we have a present PMD entry and we don't want to freeze ("convert to migration entries"), simply forward PG_anon_exclusive to all sub-pages, no need to temporarily clear the bit. c) In case we have a present PMD entry and want to freeze, handle it similar to try_to_migrate(): try marking the page shared first. In case we fail, we ignore the "freeze" instruction and simply split ordinarily. try_to_migrate() will properly fail because the THP is still mapped via PTEs. When splitting a compound anonymous folio (THP), the information about exclusivity is implicitly handled via the migration entries: no need to replicate PG_anon_exclusive manually. I.7. fork() handling fork() handling is relatively easy, because PG_anon_exclusive is only expressive for some page table entry types. a) Present anonymous pages page_try_dup_anon_rmap() will mark the given subpage shared -- which will fail if the page is pinned. If it failed, we have to copy (or PTE-map a PMD to handle it on the PTE level). Note that device exclusive entries are just a pointer at a PageAnon() page. fork() will first convert a device exclusive entry to a present page table and handle it just like present anonymous pages. b) Device private entry Device private entries point at PageAnon() pages that cannot be mapped directly and, therefore, cannot get pinned. page_try_dup_anon_rmap() will mark the given subpage shared, which cannot fail because they cannot get pinned. c) HW poison entries PG_anon_exclusive will remain untouched and is stale -- the page table entry is just a placeholder after all. d) Migration entries Writable and readable-exclusive entries are converted to readable entries: possibly shared. I.8. mprotect() handling mprotect() only has to properly handle the new readable-exclusive migration entry: When write-protecting a migration entry that points at an anonymous page, remember the information about exclusivity via the "readable-exclusive" migration entry type. II. Migration and GUP-fast Whenever replacing a present page table entry that maps an exclusive anonymous page by a migration entry, we have to mark the page possibly shared and synchronize against GUP-fast by a proper clear/invalidate+flush to make the following scenario impossible: 1. try_to_migrate() places a migration entry after checking for GUP pins and marks the page possibly shared. 2. GUP-fast pins the page due to lack of synchronization 3. fork() converts the "writable/readable-exclusive" migration entry into a readable migration entry 4. Migration fails due to the GUP pin (failing to freeze the refcount) 5. Migration entries are restored. PG_anon_exclusive is lost -> We have a pinned page that is not marked exclusive anymore. Note that we move information about exclusivity from the page to the migration entry as it otherwise highly overcomplicates fork() and PTE-mapping a THP. III. Swapout and GUP-fast Whenever replacing a present page table entry that maps an exclusive anonymous page by a swap entry, we have to mark the page possibly shared and synchronize against GUP-fast by a proper clear/invalidate+flush to make the following scenario impossible: 1. try_to_unmap() places a swap entry after checking for GUP pins and clears exclusivity information on the page. 2. GUP-fast pins the page due to lack of synchronization. -> We have a pinned page that is not marked exclusive anymore. If we'd ever store information about exclusivity in the swap entry, similar to migration handling, the same considerations as in II would apply. This is future work. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220428083441.37290-13-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Christoph Hellwig Cc: David Rientjes Cc: Don Dutile Cc: Hugh Dickins Cc: Jan Kara Cc: Jann Horn Cc: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: John Hubbard Cc: Khalid Aziz Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: Liang Zhang Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Mike Kravetz Cc: Mike Rapoport Cc: Nadav Amit Cc: Oded Gabbay Cc: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Pedro Demarchi Gomes Cc: Peter Xu Cc: Rik van Riel Cc: Roman Gushchin Cc: Shakeel Butt Cc: Yang Shi Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton

memory tiering: skip to scan fast memory

2022-03-22T22:57:09Z

If the NUMA balancing isn't used to optimize the page placement among sockets but only among memory types, the hot pages in the fast memory node couldn't be migrated (promoted) to anywhere. So it's unnecessary to scan the pages in the fast memory node via changing their PTE/PMD mapping to be PROT_NONE. So that the page faults could be avoided too. In the test, if only the memory tiering NUMA balancing mode is enabled, the number of the NUMA balancing hint faults for the DRAM node is reduced to almost 0 with the patch. While the benchmark score doesn't change visibly. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220221084529.1052339-4-ying.huang@intel.com Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" Suggested-by: Dave Hansen Tested-by: Baolin Wang Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang Acked-by: Johannes Weiner Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador Reviewed-by: Yang Shi Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Rik van Riel Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Zi Yan Cc: Wei Xu Cc: Shakeel Butt Cc: zhongjiang-ali Cc: Feng Tang Cc: Randy Dunlap Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds