kernel.git/fs/hfs, branch linux-4.19.y

hfs: fix to initialize fields of hfs_inode_info after hfs_alloc_inode()

2024-08-19T03:32:03Z

commit 26a2ed107929a855155429b11e1293b83e6b2a8b upstream. Syzbot reports uninitialized value access issue as below: loop0: detected capacity change from 0 to 64 ===================================================== BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in hfs_revalidate_dentry+0x307/0x3f0 fs/hfs/sysdep.c:30 hfs_revalidate_dentry+0x307/0x3f0 fs/hfs/sysdep.c:30 d_revalidate fs/namei.c:862 [inline] lookup_fast+0x89e/0x8e0 fs/namei.c:1649 walk_component fs/namei.c:2001 [inline] link_path_walk+0x817/0x1480 fs/namei.c:2332 path_lookupat+0xd9/0x6f0 fs/namei.c:2485 filename_lookup+0x22e/0x740 fs/namei.c:2515 user_path_at_empty+0x8b/0x390 fs/namei.c:2924 user_path_at include/linux/namei.h:57 [inline] do_mount fs/namespace.c:3689 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3898 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x66b/0x810 fs/namespace.c:3875 __x64_sys_mount+0xe4/0x140 fs/namespace.c:3875 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in hfs_ext_read_extent fs/hfs/extent.c:196 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in hfs_get_block+0x92d/0x1620 fs/hfs/extent.c:366 hfs_ext_read_extent fs/hfs/extent.c:196 [inline] hfs_get_block+0x92d/0x1620 fs/hfs/extent.c:366 block_read_full_folio+0x4ff/0x11b0 fs/buffer.c:2271 hfs_read_folio+0x55/0x60 fs/hfs/inode.c:39 filemap_read_folio+0x148/0x4f0 mm/filemap.c:2426 do_read_cache_folio+0x7c8/0xd90 mm/filemap.c:3553 do_read_cache_page mm/filemap.c:3595 [inline] read_cache_page+0xfb/0x2f0 mm/filemap.c:3604 read_mapping_page include/linux/pagemap.h:755 [inline] hfs_btree_open+0x928/0x1ae0 fs/hfs/btree.c:78 hfs_mdb_get+0x260c/0x3000 fs/hfs/mdb.c:204 hfs_fill_super+0x1fb1/0x2790 fs/hfs/super.c:406 mount_bdev+0x628/0x920 fs/super.c:1359 hfs_mount+0xcd/0xe0 fs/hfs/super.c:456 legacy_get_tree+0x167/0x2e0 fs/fs_context.c:610 vfs_get_tree+0xdc/0x5d0 fs/super.c:1489 do_new_mount+0x7a9/0x16f0 fs/namespace.c:3145 path_mount+0xf98/0x26a0 fs/namespace.c:3475 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3488 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3697 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x919/0x9e0 fs/namespace.c:3674 __ia32_sys_mount+0x15b/0x1b0 fs/namespace.c:3674 do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:112 [inline] __do_fast_syscall_32+0xa2/0x100 arch/x86/entry/common.c:178 do_fast_syscall_32+0x37/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:203 do_SYSENTER_32+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/common.c:246 entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x70/0x82 Uninit was created at: __alloc_pages+0x9a6/0xe00 mm/page_alloc.c:4590 __alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:238 [inline] alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:261 [inline] alloc_slab_page mm/slub.c:2190 [inline] allocate_slab mm/slub.c:2354 [inline] new_slab+0x2d7/0x1400 mm/slub.c:2407 ___slab_alloc+0x16b5/0x3970 mm/slub.c:3540 __slab_alloc mm/slub.c:3625 [inline] __slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3678 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3850 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_lru+0x64d/0xb30 mm/slub.c:3879 alloc_inode_sb include/linux/fs.h:3018 [inline] hfs_alloc_inode+0x5a/0xc0 fs/hfs/super.c:165 alloc_inode+0x83/0x440 fs/inode.c:260 new_inode_pseudo fs/inode.c:1005 [inline] new_inode+0x38/0x4f0 fs/inode.c:1031 hfs_new_inode+0x61/0x1010 fs/hfs/inode.c:186 hfs_mkdir+0x54/0x250 fs/hfs/dir.c:228 vfs_mkdir+0x49a/0x700 fs/namei.c:4126 do_mkdirat+0x529/0x810 fs/namei.c:4149 __do_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4164 [inline] __se_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4162 [inline] __x64_sys_mkdirat+0xc8/0x120 fs/namei.c:4162 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b It missed to initialize .tz_secondswest, .cached_start and .cached_blocks fields in struct hfs_inode_info after hfs_alloc_inode(), fix it. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: syzbot+3ae6be33a50b5aae4dab@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/0000000000005ad04005ee48897f@google.com Signed-off-by: Chao Yu Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240616013841.2217-1-chao@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

hfs: fix missing hfs_bnode_get() in __hfs_bnode_create

2023-03-11T15:31:49Z

commit a9dc087fd3c484fd1ed18c5efb290efaaf44ce03 upstream. Syzbot found a kernel BUG in hfs_bnode_put(): kernel BUG at fs/hfs/bnode.c:466! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN CPU: 0 PID: 3634 Comm: kworker/u4:5 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc7-syzkaller-00190-g97ee9d1c1696 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022 Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-7:0) RIP: 0010:hfs_bnode_put+0x46f/0x480 fs/hfs/bnode.c:466 Code: 8a 80 ff e9 73 fe ff ff 89 d9 80 e1 07 80 c1 03 38 c1 0f 8c a0 fe ff ff 48 89 df e8 db 8a 80 ff e9 93 fe ff ff e8 a1 68 2c ff <0f> 0b e8 9a 68 2c ff 0f 0b 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 55 41 57 41 56 RSP: 0018:ffffc90003b4f258 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: ffffffff825e318f RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff8880739dd7c0 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffffc90003b4f430 R08: ffffffff825e2d9b R09: ffffed10045157d1 R10: ffffed10045157d1 R11: 1ffff110045157d0 R12: ffff8880228abe80 R13: ffff88807016c000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff8880228abe00 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b9800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fa6ebe88718 CR3: 000000001e93d000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: hfs_write_inode+0x1bc/0xb40 write_inode fs/fs-writeback.c:1440 [inline] __writeback_single_inode+0x4d6/0x670 fs/fs-writeback.c:1652 writeback_sb_inodes+0xb3b/0x18f0 fs/fs-writeback.c:1878 __writeback_inodes_wb+0x125/0x420 fs/fs-writeback.c:1949 wb_writeback+0x440/0x7b0 fs/fs-writeback.c:2054 wb_check_start_all fs/fs-writeback.c:2176 [inline] wb_do_writeback fs/fs-writeback.c:2202 [inline] wb_workfn+0x827/0xef0 fs/fs-writeback.c:2235 process_one_work+0x877/0xdb0 kernel/workqueue.c:2289 worker_thread+0xb14/0x1330 kernel/workqueue.c:2436 kthread+0x266/0x300 kernel/kthread.c:376 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:306 The BUG_ON() is triggered at here: /* Dispose of resources used by a node */ void hfs_bnode_put(struct hfs_bnode *node) { if (node) { BUG_ON(!atomic_read(&node->refcnt)); <- we have issue here!!!! } } By tracing the refcnt, I found the node is created by hfs_bmap_alloc() with refcnt 1. Then the node is used by hfs_btree_write(). There is a missing of hfs_bnode_get() after find the node. The issue happened in following path: hfs_bmap_alloc hfs_bnode_find __hfs_bnode_create <- allocate a new node with refcnt 1. hfs_bnode_put <- decrease the refcnt hfs_btree_write hfs_bnode_find __hfs_bnode_create hfs_bnode_findhash <- find the node without refcnt increased. hfs_bnode_put <- trigger the BUG_ON() since refcnt is 0. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221212021627.3766829-1-liushixin2@huawei.com Reported-by: syzbot+5b04b49a7ec7226c7426@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin Cc: Fabio M. De Francesco Cc: Viacheslav Dubeyko Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

hfs/hfsplus: avoid WARN_ON() for sanity check, use proper error handling

2023-01-18T10:30:51Z

commit cb7a95af78d29442b8294683eca4897544b8ef46 upstream. Commit 55d1cbbbb29e ("hfs/hfsplus: use WARN_ON for sanity check") fixed a build warning by turning a comment into a WARN_ON(), but it turns out that syzbot then complains because it can trigger said warning with a corrupted hfs image. The warning actually does warn about a bad situation, but we are much better off just handling it as the error it is. So rather than warn about us doing bad things, stop doing the bad things and return -EIO. While at it, also fix a memory leak that was introduced by an earlier fix for a similar syzbot warning situation, and add a check for one case that historically wasn't handled at all (ie neither comment nor subsequent WARN_ON). Reported-by: syzbot+7bb7cd3595533513a9e7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 55d1cbbbb29e ("hfs/hfsplus: use WARN_ON for sanity check") Fixes: 8d824e69d9f3 ("hfs: fix OOB Read in __hfs_brec_find") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/000000000000dbce4e05f170f289@google.com/ Tested-by: Michael Schmitz Cc: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Viacheslav Dubeyko Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

hfs/hfsplus: use WARN_ON for sanity check

2023-01-18T10:30:51Z

commit 55d1cbbbb29e6656c662ee8f73ba1fc4777532eb upstream. gcc warns about a couple of instances in which a sanity check exists but the author wasn't sure how to react to it failing, which makes it look like a possible bug: fs/hfsplus/inode.c: In function 'hfsplus_cat_read_inode': fs/hfsplus/inode.c:503:37: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Werror=empty-body] 503 | /* panic? */; | ^ fs/hfsplus/inode.c:524:37: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Werror=empty-body] 524 | /* panic? */; | ^ fs/hfsplus/inode.c: In function 'hfsplus_cat_write_inode': fs/hfsplus/inode.c:582:37: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Werror=empty-body] 582 | /* panic? */; | ^ fs/hfsplus/inode.c:608:37: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Werror=empty-body] 608 | /* panic? */; | ^ fs/hfs/inode.c: In function 'hfs_write_inode': fs/hfs/inode.c:464:37: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Werror=empty-body] 464 | /* panic? */; | ^ fs/hfs/inode.c:485:37: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Werror=empty-body] 485 | /* panic? */; | ^ panic() is probably not the correct choice here, but a WARN_ON seems appropriate and avoids the compile-time warning. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210927102149.1809384-1-arnd@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210322223249.2632268-1-arnd@kernel.org/ Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner Cc: Alexander Viro Cc: Christian Brauner Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

hfs: fix OOB Read in __hfs_brec_find

2023-01-18T10:30:34Z

[ Upstream commit 8d824e69d9f3fa3121b2dda25053bae71e2460d2 ] Syzbot reported a OOB read bug: ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in hfs_strcmp+0x117/0x190 fs/hfs/string.c:84 Read of size 1 at addr ffff88807eb62c4e by task kworker/u4:1/11 CPU: 1 PID: 11 Comm: kworker/u4:1 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc6-syzkaller-00308-g644e9524388a #0 Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-7:0) Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x1b1/0x28e lib/dump_stack.c:106 print_address_description+0x74/0x340 mm/kasan/report.c:284 print_report+0x107/0x1f0 mm/kasan/report.c:395 kasan_report+0xcd/0x100 mm/kasan/report.c:495 hfs_strcmp+0x117/0x190 fs/hfs/string.c:84 __hfs_brec_find+0x213/0x5c0 fs/hfs/bfind.c:75 hfs_brec_find+0x276/0x520 fs/hfs/bfind.c:138 hfs_write_inode+0x34c/0xb40 fs/hfs/inode.c:462 write_inode fs/fs-writeback.c:1440 [inline] If the input inode of hfs_write_inode() is incorrect: struct inode struct hfs_inode_info struct hfs_cat_key struct hfs_name u8 len # len is greater than HFS_NAMELEN(31) which is the maximum length of an HFS filename OOB read occurred: hfs_write_inode() hfs_brec_find() __hfs_brec_find() hfs_cat_keycmp() hfs_strcmp() # OOB read occurred due to len is too large Fix this by adding a Check on len in hfs_write_inode() before calling hfs_brec_find(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221130065959.2168236-1-zhangpeng362@huawei.com Signed-off-by: ZhangPeng Reported-by: Cc: Damien Le Moal Cc: Ira Weiny Cc: Jeff Layton Cc: Kefeng Wang Cc: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Nanyong Sun Cc: Viacheslav Dubeyko Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

hfs: Fix OOB Write in hfs_asc2mac

2023-01-18T10:30:08Z

[ Upstream commit c53ed55cb275344086e32a7080a6b19cb183650b ] Syzbot reported a OOB Write bug: loop0: detected capacity change from 0 to 64 ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in hfs_asc2mac+0x467/0x9a0 fs/hfs/trans.c:133 Write of size 1 at addr ffff88801848314e by task syz-executor391/3632 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x1b1/0x28e lib/dump_stack.c:106 print_address_description+0x74/0x340 mm/kasan/report.c:284 print_report+0x107/0x1f0 mm/kasan/report.c:395 kasan_report+0xcd/0x100 mm/kasan/report.c:495 hfs_asc2mac+0x467/0x9a0 fs/hfs/trans.c:133 hfs_cat_build_key+0x92/0x170 fs/hfs/catalog.c:28 hfs_lookup+0x1ab/0x2c0 fs/hfs/dir.c:31 lookup_open fs/namei.c:3391 [inline] open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3481 [inline] path_openat+0x10e6/0x2df0 fs/namei.c:3710 do_filp_open+0x264/0x4f0 fs/namei.c:3740 If in->len is much larger than HFS_NAMELEN(31) which is the maximum length of an HFS filename, a OOB write could occur in hfs_asc2mac(). In that case, when the dst reaches the boundary, the srclen is still greater than 0, which causes a OOB write. Fix this by adding a check on dstlen in while() before writing to dst address. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221202030038.1391945-1-zhangpeng362@huawei.com Fixes: 328b92278650 ("[PATCH] hfs: NLS support") Signed-off-by: ZhangPeng Reviewed-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko Reported-by: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

hfs: add lock nesting notation to hfs_find_init

2021-07-31T06:22:38Z

[ Upstream commit b3b2177a2d795e35dc11597b2609eb1e7e57e570 ] Syzbot reports a possible recursive lock in [1]. This happens due to missing lock nesting information. From the logs, we see that a call to hfs_fill_super is made to mount the hfs filesystem. While searching for the root inode, the lock on the catalog btree is grabbed. Then, when the parent of the root isn't found, a call to __hfs_bnode_create is made to create the parent of the root. This eventually leads to a call to hfs_ext_read_extent which grabs a lock on the extents btree. Since the order of locking is catalog btree -> extents btree, this lock hierarchy does not lead to a deadlock. To tell lockdep that this locking is safe, we add nesting notation to distinguish between catalog btrees, extents btrees, and attributes btrees (for HFS+). This has already been done in hfsplus. Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=f007ef1d7a31a469e3be7aeb0fde0769b18585db [1] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210701030756.58760-4-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi Reported-by: syzbot+b718ec84a87b7e73ade4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Tested-by: syzbot+b718ec84a87b7e73ade4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reviewed-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko Cc: Al Viro Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva Cc: Shuah Khan Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

hfs: fix high memory mapping in hfs_bnode_read

2021-07-31T06:22:38Z

[ Upstream commit 54a5ead6f5e2b47131a7385d0c0af18e7b89cb02 ] Pages that we read in hfs_bnode_read need to be kmapped into kernel address space. However, currently only the 0th page is kmapped. If the given offset + length exceeds this 0th page, then we have an invalid memory access. To fix this, we kmap relevant pages one by one and copy their relevant portions of data. An example of invalid memory access occurring without this fix can be seen in the following crash report: ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in memcpy include/linux/fortify-string.h:191 [inline] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in hfs_bnode_read+0xc4/0xe0 fs/hfs/bnode.c:26 Read of size 2 at addr ffff888125fdcffe by task syz-executor5/4634 CPU: 0 PID: 4634 Comm: syz-executor5 Not tainted 5.13.0-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:79 [inline] dump_stack+0x195/0x1f8 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x1d/0x110 mm/kasan/report.c:233 __kasan_report mm/kasan/report.c:419 [inline] kasan_report.cold+0x7b/0xd4 mm/kasan/report.c:436 check_region_inline mm/kasan/generic.c:180 [inline] kasan_check_range+0x154/0x1b0 mm/kasan/generic.c:186 memcpy+0x24/0x60 mm/kasan/shadow.c:65 memcpy include/linux/fortify-string.h:191 [inline] hfs_bnode_read+0xc4/0xe0 fs/hfs/bnode.c:26 hfs_bnode_read_u16 fs/hfs/bnode.c:34 [inline] hfs_bnode_find+0x880/0xcc0 fs/hfs/bnode.c:365 hfs_brec_find+0x2d8/0x540 fs/hfs/bfind.c:126 hfs_brec_read+0x27/0x120 fs/hfs/bfind.c:165 hfs_cat_find_brec+0x19a/0x3b0 fs/hfs/catalog.c:194 hfs_fill_super+0xc13/0x1460 fs/hfs/super.c:419 mount_bdev+0x331/0x3f0 fs/super.c:1368 hfs_mount+0x35/0x40 fs/hfs/super.c:457 legacy_get_tree+0x10c/0x220 fs/fs_context.c:592 vfs_get_tree+0x93/0x300 fs/super.c:1498 do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:2905 [inline] path_mount+0x13f5/0x20e0 fs/namespace.c:3235 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3248 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3456 [inline] __se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3433 [inline] __x64_sys_mount+0x2b8/0x340 fs/namespace.c:3433 do_syscall_64+0x37/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:47 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x45e63a Code: 48 c7 c2 bc ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff eb d2 e8 88 04 00 00 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 49 89 ca b8 a5 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 bc ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007f9404d410d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a5 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000020000248 RCX: 000000000045e63a RDX: 0000000020000000 RSI: 0000000020000100 RDI: 00007f9404d41120 RBP: 00007f9404d41120 R08: 00000000200002c0 R09: 0000000020000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000003 R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 00000000004ad5d8 R15: 0000000000000000 The buggy address belongs to the page: page:00000000dadbcf3e refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x1 pfn:0x125fdc flags: 0x2fffc0000000000(node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x3fff) raw: 02fffc0000000000 ffffea000497f748 ffffea000497f6c8 0000000000000000 raw: 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000 page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected Memory state around the buggy address: ffff888125fdce80: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ffff888125fdcf00: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff >ffff888125fdcf80: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ^ ffff888125fdd000: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ffff888125fdd080: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ================================================================== Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210701030756.58760-3-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi Reviewed-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko Cc: Al Viro Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva Cc: Shuah Khan Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

hfs: add missing clean-up in hfs_fill_super

2021-07-31T06:22:38Z

[ Upstream commit 16ee572eaf0d09daa4c8a755fdb71e40dbf8562d ] Patch series "hfs: fix various errors", v2. This series ultimately aims to address a lockdep warning in hfs_find_init reported by Syzbot [1]. The work done for this led to the discovery of another bug, and the Syzkaller repro test also reveals an invalid memory access error after clearing the lockdep warning. Hence, this series is broken up into three patches: 1. Add a missing call to hfs_find_exit for an error path in hfs_fill_super 2. Fix memory mapping in hfs_bnode_read by fixing calls to kmap 3. Add lock nesting notation to tell lockdep that the observed locking hierarchy is safe This patch (of 3): Before exiting hfs_fill_super, the struct hfs_find_data used in hfs_find_init should be passed to hfs_find_exit to be cleaned up, and to release the lock held on the btree. The call to hfs_find_exit is missing from an error path. We add it back in by consolidating calls to hfs_find_exit for error paths. Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=f007ef1d7a31a469e3be7aeb0fde0769b18585db [1] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210701030756.58760-1-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210701030756.58760-2-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi Reviewed-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva Cc: Al Viro Cc: Shuah Khan Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

fs/hfs/extent.c: fix array out of bounds read of array extent

2019-12-01T08:17:10Z

[ Upstream commit 6c9a3f843a29d6894dfc40df338b91dbd78f0ae3 ] Currently extent and index i are both being incremented causing an array out of bounds read on extent[i]. Fix this by removing the extraneous increment of extent. Ernesto said: : This is only triggered when deleting a file with a resource fork. I : may be wrong because the documentation isn't clear, but I don't think : you can create those under linux. So I guess nobody was testing them. : : > A disk space leak, perhaps? : : That's what it looks like in general. hfs_free_extents() won't do : anything if the block count doesn't add up, and the error will be : ignored. Now, if the block count randomly does add up, we could see : some corruption. Detected by CoverityScan, CID#711541 ("Out of bounds read") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180831140538.31566-1-colin.king@canonical.com Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King Reviewed-by: Ernesto A. Fernndez Cc: David Howells Cc: Al Viro Cc: Hin-Tak Leung Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin