kernel.git/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c, branch linux-6.15.y

f2fs: Remove f2fs_write_meta_page()

2025-03-11T19:37:57Z

Mappings which implement writepages should not implement writepage as it can only harm writeback patterns. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) Reviewed-by: Chao Yu Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim

Revert "f2fs: rebuild nat_bits during umount"

2025-03-11T03:25:54Z

This reverts commit 94c821fb286b545d37549ff30a0c341e066f0d6c. It reports that there is potential corruption in node footer, the most suspious feature is nat_bits, let's revert recovery related code. Signed-off-by: Chao Yu Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim

f2fs: set highest IO priority for checkpoint thread

2025-03-05T14:37:26Z

The checkpoint is the top priority thread which can stop all the filesystem operations. Let's make it RT priority. Reviewed-by: Daeho Jeong Reviewed-by: Chao Yu Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim

f2fs: Use a folio throughout __get_meta_page()

2025-03-04T17:02:26Z

Use f2fs_grab_cache_folio() to get a folio and use it throughout, removing seven calls to compound_head() and a reference to page->mapping. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) Reviewed-by: Chao Yu Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim

f2fs: quota: fix to avoid warning in dquot_writeback_dquots()

2025-02-10T16:58:42Z

F2FS-fs (dm-59): checkpoint=enable has some unwritten data. ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 8013 at fs/quota/dquot.c:691 dquot_writeback_dquots+0x2fc/0x308 pc : dquot_writeback_dquots+0x2fc/0x308 lr : f2fs_quota_sync+0xcc/0x1c4 Call trace: dquot_writeback_dquots+0x2fc/0x308 f2fs_quota_sync+0xcc/0x1c4 f2fs_write_checkpoint+0x3d4/0x9b0 f2fs_issue_checkpoint+0x1bc/0x2c0 f2fs_sync_fs+0x54/0x150 f2fs_do_sync_file+0x2f8/0x814 __f2fs_ioctl+0x1960/0x3244 f2fs_ioctl+0x54/0xe0 __arm64_sys_ioctl+0xa8/0xe4 invoke_syscall+0x58/0x114 checkpoint and f2fs_remount may race as below, resulting triggering warning in dquot_writeback_dquots(). atomic write remount - do_remount - down_write(&sb->s_umount); - f2fs_remount - ioctl - f2fs_do_sync_file - f2fs_sync_fs - f2fs_write_checkpoint - block_operations - locked = down_read_trylock(&sbi->sb->s_umount) : fail to lock due to the write lock was held by remount - up_write(&sb->s_umount); - f2fs_quota_sync - dquot_writeback_dquots - WARN_ON_ONCE(!rwsem_is_locked(&sb->s_umount)) : trigger warning because s_umount lock was unlocked by remount If checkpoint comes from mount/umount/remount/freeze/quotactl, caller of checkpoint has already held s_umount lock, calling dquot_writeback_dquots() in the context should be safe. So let's record task to sbi->umount_lock_holder, so that checkpoint can know whether the lock has held in the context or not by checking current w/ it. In addition, in order to not misrepresent caller of checkpoint, we should not allow to trigger async checkpoint for those callers: mount/umount/remount/ freeze/quotactl. Fixes: af033b2aa8a8 ("f2fs: guarantee journalled quota data by checkpoint") Signed-off-by: Chao Yu Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim

f2fs: fix to avoid potential deadlock in f2fs_record_stop_reason()

2024-11-01T01:24:41Z

syzbot reports deadlock issue of f2fs as below: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.12.0-rc3-syzkaller-00087-gc964ced77262 #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/79 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888011824088 (&sbi->sb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2199 [inline] ffff888011824088 (&sbi->sb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_record_stop_reason+0x52/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4068 but task is already holding lock: ffff88804bd92610 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: f2fs_evict_inode+0x662/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:842 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}: lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825 percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline] __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1716 [inline] sb_start_intwrite+0x4d/0x1c0 include/linux/fs.h:1899 f2fs_evict_inode+0x662/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:842 evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725 f2fs_evict_inode+0x1a4/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:807 evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725 dispose_list fs/inode.c:774 [inline] prune_icache_sb+0x239/0x2f0 fs/inode.c:963 super_cache_scan+0x38c/0x4b0 fs/super.c:223 do_shrink_slab+0x701/0x1160 mm/shrinker.c:435 shrink_slab+0x1093/0x14d0 mm/shrinker.c:662 shrink_one+0x43b/0x850 mm/vmscan.c:4818 shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4879 [inline] lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:4957 [inline] shrink_node+0x3799/0x3de0 mm/vmscan.c:5937 kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6765 [inline] balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6957 [inline] kswapd+0x1ca3/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7226 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 -> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825 __fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3834 [inline] fs_reclaim_acquire+0x88/0x130 mm/page_alloc.c:3848 might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:318 [inline] prepare_alloc_pages+0x147/0x5b0 mm/page_alloc.c:4493 __alloc_pages_noprof+0x16f/0x710 mm/page_alloc.c:4722 alloc_pages_mpol_noprof+0x3e8/0x680 mm/mempolicy.c:2265 alloc_pages_noprof mm/mempolicy.c:2345 [inline] folio_alloc_noprof+0x128/0x180 mm/mempolicy.c:2352 filemap_alloc_folio_noprof+0xdf/0x500 mm/filemap.c:1010 do_read_cache_folio+0x2eb/0x850 mm/filemap.c:3787 read_mapping_folio include/linux/pagemap.h:1011 [inline] f2fs_commit_super+0x3c0/0x7d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4032 f2fs_record_stop_reason+0x13b/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4079 f2fs_handle_critical_error+0x2ac/0x5c0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4174 f2fs_write_inode+0x35f/0x4d0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:785 write_inode fs/fs-writeback.c:1503 [inline] __writeback_single_inode+0x711/0x10d0 fs/fs-writeback.c:1723 writeback_single_inode+0x1f3/0x660 fs/fs-writeback.c:1779 sync_inode_metadata+0xc4/0x120 fs/fs-writeback.c:2849 f2fs_release_file+0xa8/0x100 fs/f2fs/file.c:1941 __fput+0x23f/0x880 fs/file_table.c:431 task_work_run+0x24f/0x310 kernel/task_work.c:228 resume_user_mode_work include/linux/resume_user_mode.h:50 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:114 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:328 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x168/0x370 kernel/entry/common.c:218 do_syscall_64+0x100/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #0 (&sbi->sb_lock){++++}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline] validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904 __lock_acquire+0x1384/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5202 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825 down_write+0x99/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1577 f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2199 [inline] f2fs_record_stop_reason+0x52/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4068 f2fs_handle_critical_error+0x2ac/0x5c0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4174 f2fs_evict_inode+0xa61/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:883 evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725 f2fs_evict_inode+0x1a4/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:807 evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725 dispose_list fs/inode.c:774 [inline] prune_icache_sb+0x239/0x2f0 fs/inode.c:963 super_cache_scan+0x38c/0x4b0 fs/super.c:223 do_shrink_slab+0x701/0x1160 mm/shrinker.c:435 shrink_slab+0x1093/0x14d0 mm/shrinker.c:662 shrink_one+0x43b/0x850 mm/vmscan.c:4818 shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4879 [inline] lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:4957 [inline] shrink_node+0x3799/0x3de0 mm/vmscan.c:5937 kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6765 [inline] balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6957 [inline] kswapd+0x1ca3/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7226 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &sbi->sb_lock --> fs_reclaim --> sb_internal#2 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- rlock(sb_internal#2); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(sb_internal#2); lock(&sbi->sb_lock); Root cause is there will be potential deadlock in between below tasks: Thread A Kswapd - f2fs_ioc_commit_atomic_write - mnt_want_write_file -- down_read lock A - balance_pgdat - __fs_reclaim_acquire -- lock B - shrink_node - prune_icache_sb - dispose_list - f2fs_evict_inode - sb_start_intwrite -- down_read lock A - f2fs_do_sync_file - f2fs_write_inode - f2fs_handle_critical_error - f2fs_record_stop_reason - f2fs_commit_super - read_mapping_folio - filemap_alloc_folio_noprof - fs_reclaim_acquire -- lock B Both threads try to acquire read lock of lock A, then its upcoming write lock grabber will trigger deadlock. Let's always create an asynchronous task in f2fs_handle_critical_error() rather than calling f2fs_record_stop_reason() synchronously to avoid this potential deadlock issue. Fixes: b62e71be2110 ("f2fs: support errors=remount-ro|continue|panic mountoption") Reported-by: syzbot+be4a9983e95a5e25c8d3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/6704d667.050a0220.1e4d62.0081.GAE@google.com Signed-off-by: Chao Yu Reviewed-by: Daejun Park Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim

f2fs: convert f2fs_handle_page_eio() to use folio

2024-09-06T23:04:47Z

Convert to use folio, so that we can get rid of 'page->index' to prepare for removal of 'index' field in structure page [1]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Zp8fgUSIBGQ1TN0D@casper.infradead.org/ Cc: Matthew Wilcox Signed-off-by: Chao Yu Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim

f2fs: convert __f2fs_write_meta_page() to use folio

2024-09-06T23:04:47Z

f2fs: convert f2fs_do_write_meta_page() to use folio

2024-09-06T23:04:47Z

f2fs: clean up val{>>,<<}F2FS_BLKSIZE_BITS

2024-08-21T00:56:27Z

Use F2FS_BYTES_TO_BLK(bytes) and F2FS_BLK_TO_BYTES(blk) for cleanup Signed-off-by: Zhiguo Niu Reviewed-by: Chao Yu Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim