kernel.git/fs/cifs/misc.c, branch linux-4.9.y

CIFS: Properly process SMB3 lease breaks

2020-10-01T18:40:04Z

[ Upstream commit 9bd4540836684013aaad6070a65d6fcdd9006625 ] Currenly we doesn't assume that a server may break a lease from RWH to RW which causes us setting a wrong lease state on a file and thus mistakenly flushing data and byte-range locks and purging cached data on the client. This leads to performance degradation because subsequent IOs go directly to the server. Fix this by propagating new lease state and epoch values to the oplock break handler through cifsFileInfo structure and removing the use of cifsInodeInfo flags for that. It allows to avoid some races of several lease/oplock breaks using those flags in parallel. Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky Signed-off-by: Steve French Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

CIFS: keep FileInfo handle live during oplock break

2019-04-27T07:34:41Z

commit b98749cac4a695f084a5ff076f4510b23e353ecd upstream. In the oplock break handler, writing pending changes from pages puts the FileInfo handle. If the refcount reaches zero it closes the handle and waits for any oplock break handler to return, thus causing a deadlock. To prevent this situation: * We add a wait flag to cifsFileInfo_put() to decide whether we should wait for running/pending oplock break handlers * We keep an additionnal reference of the SMB FileInfo handle so that for the rest of the handler putting the handle won't close it. - The ref is bumped everytime we queue the handler via the cifs_queue_oplock_break() helper. - The ref is decremented at the end of the handler This bug was triggered by xfstest 464. Also important fix to address the various reports of oops in smb2_push_mandatory_locks Signed-off-by: Aurelien Aptel Signed-off-by: Steve French Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky CC: Stable Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

cifs: read overflow in is_valid_oplock_break()

2018-10-10T06:53:22Z

[ Upstream commit 097f5863b1a0c9901f180bbd56ae7d630655faaa ] We need to verify that the "data_offset" is within bounds. Reported-by: Dr Silvio Cesare of InfoSect Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter Signed-off-by: Steve French Reviewed-by: Aurelien Aptel Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

CIFS: zero sensitive data when freeing

2018-02-17T12:21:12Z

commit 97f4b7276b829a8927ac903a119bef2f963ccc58 upstream. also replaces memset()+kfree() by kzfree(). Signed-off-by: Aurelien Aptel Signed-off-by: Steve French Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

CIFS: fix oplock break deadlocks

2017-05-20T12:28:40Z

commit 3998e6b87d4258a70df358296d6f1c7234012bfe upstream. When the final cifsFileInfo_put() is called from cifsiod and an oplock break work is queued, lockdep complains loudly: ============================================= [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] 4.11.0+ #21 Not tainted --------------------------------------------- kworker/0:2/78 is trying to acquire lock: ("cifsiod"){++++.+}, at: flush_work+0x215/0x350 but task is already holding lock: ("cifsiod"){++++.+}, at: process_one_work+0x255/0x8e0 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock("cifsiod"); lock("cifsiod"); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 2 locks held by kworker/0:2/78: #0: ("cifsiod"){++++.+}, at: process_one_work+0x255/0x8e0 #1: ((&wdata->work)){+.+...}, at: process_one_work+0x255/0x8e0 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 78 Comm: kworker/0:2 Not tainted 4.11.0+ #21 Workqueue: cifsiod cifs_writev_complete Call Trace: dump_stack+0x85/0xc2 __lock_acquire+0x17dd/0x2260 ? match_held_lock+0x20/0x2b0 ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x86/0x130 ? mark_lock+0xa6/0x920 lock_acquire+0xcc/0x260 ? lock_acquire+0xcc/0x260 ? flush_work+0x215/0x350 flush_work+0x236/0x350 ? flush_work+0x215/0x350 ? destroy_worker+0x170/0x170 __cancel_work_timer+0x17d/0x210 ? ___preempt_schedule+0x16/0x18 cancel_work_sync+0x10/0x20 cifsFileInfo_put+0x338/0x7f0 cifs_writedata_release+0x2a/0x40 ? cifs_writedata_release+0x2a/0x40 cifs_writev_complete+0x29d/0x850 ? preempt_count_sub+0x18/0xd0 process_one_work+0x304/0x8e0 worker_thread+0x9b/0x6a0 kthread+0x1b2/0x200 ? process_one_work+0x8e0/0x8e0 ? kthread_create_on_node+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x31/0x40 This is a real warning. Since the oplock is queued on the same workqueue this can deadlock if there is only one worker thread active for the workqueue (which will be the case during memory pressure when the rescuer thread is handling it). Furthermore, there is at least one other kind of hang possible due to the oplock break handling if there is only worker. (This can be reproduced without introducing memory pressure by having passing 1 for the max_active parameter of cifsiod.) cifs_oplock_break() can wait indefintely in the filemap_fdatawait() while the cifs_writev_complete() work is blocked: sysrq: SysRq : Show Blocked State task PC stack pid father kworker/0:1 D 0 16 2 0x00000000 Workqueue: cifsiod cifs_oplock_break Call Trace: __schedule+0x562/0xf40 ? mark_held_locks+0x4a/0xb0 schedule+0x57/0xe0 io_schedule+0x21/0x50 wait_on_page_bit+0x143/0x190 ? add_to_page_cache_lru+0x150/0x150 __filemap_fdatawait_range+0x134/0x190 ? do_writepages+0x51/0x70 filemap_fdatawait_range+0x14/0x30 filemap_fdatawait+0x3b/0x40 cifs_oplock_break+0x651/0x710 ? preempt_count_sub+0x18/0xd0 process_one_work+0x304/0x8e0 worker_thread+0x9b/0x6a0 kthread+0x1b2/0x200 ? process_one_work+0x8e0/0x8e0 ? kthread_create_on_node+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x31/0x40 dd D 0 683 171 0x00000000 Call Trace: __schedule+0x562/0xf40 ? mark_held_locks+0x29/0xb0 schedule+0x57/0xe0 io_schedule+0x21/0x50 wait_on_page_bit+0x143/0x190 ? add_to_page_cache_lru+0x150/0x150 __filemap_fdatawait_range+0x134/0x190 ? do_writepages+0x51/0x70 filemap_fdatawait_range+0x14/0x30 filemap_fdatawait+0x3b/0x40 filemap_write_and_wait+0x4e/0x70 cifs_flush+0x6a/0xb0 filp_close+0x52/0xa0 __close_fd+0xdc/0x150 SyS_close+0x33/0x60 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1f/0xbe Showing all locks held in the system: 2 locks held by kworker/0:1/16: #0: ("cifsiod"){.+.+.+}, at: process_one_work+0x255/0x8e0 #1: ((&cfile->oplock_break)){+.+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x255/0x8e0 Showing busy workqueues and worker pools: workqueue cifsiod: flags=0xc pwq 0: cpus=0 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 active=1/1 in-flight: 16:cifs_oplock_break delayed: cifs_writev_complete, cifs_echo_request pool 0: cpus=0 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 hung=0s workers=3 idle: 750 3 Fix these problems by creating a a new workqueue (with a rescuer) for the oplock break work. Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent Signed-off-by: Steve French Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

Clarify locking of cifs file and tcon structures and make more granular

2016-10-12T17:08:32Z

Remove the global file_list_lock to simplify cifs/smb3 locking and have spinlocks that more closely match the information they are protecting. Add new tcon->open_file_lock and file->file_info_lock spinlocks. Locks continue to follow a heirachy, cifs_socket --> cifs_ses --> cifs_tcon --> cifs_file where global tcp_ses_lock still protects socket and cifs_ses, while the the newer locks protect the lower level structure's information (tcon and cifs_file respectively). CC: Stable Signed-off-by: Steve French Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky Reviewed-by: Aurelien Aptel Reviewed-by: Germano Percossi

Prepare for encryption support (first part). Add decryption and encryption key generation. Thanks to Metze for helping with this.

2016-01-14T20:29:42Z

Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher Signed-off-by: Steve French

VFS: normal filesystems (and lustre): d_inode() annotations

2015-04-15T19:06:57Z

that's the bulk of filesystem drivers dealing with inodes of their own Signed-off-by: David Howells Signed-off-by: Al Viro

cifs: convert to print_hex_dump() instead of custom implementation

2014-12-08T04:48:01Z

This patch converts custom dumper to use native print_hex_dump() instead. The cifs_dump_mem() will have an offsets per each line which differs it from the original code. In the dump_smb() we may use native print_hex_dump() as well. It will show slightly different output in ASCII part when character is unprintable, otherwise it keeps same structure. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko Signed-off-by: Steve French

cifs: remove unused function cifs_oplock_break_wait

2014-08-11T06:31:03Z

Commit 743162013d40 ("sched: Remove proliferation of wait_on_bit() action functions") has removed the call to cifs_oplock_break_wait, making this function unused; remove it. This fixes the following compilation warning: fs/cifs/misc.c:578:1: warning: ‘cifs_oplock_break_wait’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function] Signed-off-by: Vincent Stehlé Cc: Steve French Signed-off-by: Steve French