kernel.git/fs/btrfs/relocation.c, branch linux-5.16.y

btrfs: make send work with concurrent block group relocation

2022-03-16T13:26:52Z

commit d96b34248c2f4ea8cd09286090f2f6f77102eaab upstream. We don't allow send and balance/relocation to run in parallel in order to prevent send failing or silently producing some bad stream. This is because while send is using an extent (specially metadata) or about to read a metadata extent and expecting it belongs to a specific parent node, relocation can run, the transaction used for the relocation is committed and the extent gets reallocated while send is still using the extent, so it ends up with a different content than expected. This can result in just failing to read a metadata extent due to failure of the validation checks (parent transid, level, etc), failure to find a backreference for a data extent, and other unexpected failures. Besides reallocation, there's also a similar problem of an extent getting discarded when it's unpinned after the transaction used for block group relocation is committed. The restriction between balance and send was added in commit 9e967495e0e0 ("Btrfs: prevent send failures and crashes due to concurrent relocation"), kernel 5.3, while the more general restriction between send and relocation was added in commit 1cea5cf0e664 ("btrfs: ensure relocation never runs while we have send operations running"), kernel 5.14. Both send and relocation can be very long running operations. Relocation because it has to do a lot of IO and expensive backreference lookups in case there are many snapshots, and send due to read IO when operating on very large trees. This makes it inconvenient for users and tools to deal with scheduling both operations. For zoned filesystem we also have automatic block group relocation, so send can fail with -EAGAIN when users least expect it or send can end up delaying the block group relocation for too long. In the future we might also get the automatic block group relocation for non zoned filesystems. This change makes it possible for send and relocation to run in parallel. This is achieved the following way: 1) For all tree searches, send acquires a read lock on the commit root semaphore; 2) After each tree search, and before releasing the commit root semaphore, the leaf is cloned and placed in the search path (struct btrfs_path); 3) After releasing the commit root semaphore, the changed_cb() callback is invoked, which operates on the leaf and writes commands to the pipe (or file in case send/receive is not used with a pipe). It's important here to not hold a lock on the commit root semaphore, because if we did we could deadlock when sending and receiving to the same filesystem using a pipe - the send task blocks on the pipe because it's full, the receive task, which is the only consumer of the pipe, triggers a transaction commit when attempting to create a subvolume or reserve space for a write operation for example, but the transaction commit blocks trying to write lock the commit root semaphore, resulting in a deadlock; 4) Before moving to the next key, or advancing to the next change in case of an incremental send, check if a transaction used for relocation was committed (or is about to finish its commit). If so, release the search path(s) and restart the search, to where we were before, so that we don't operate on stale extent buffers. The search restarts are always possible because both the send and parent roots are RO, and no one can add, remove of update keys (change their offset) in RO trees - the only exception is deduplication, but that is still not allowed to run in parallel with send; 5) Periodically check if there is contention on the commit root semaphore, which means there is a transaction commit trying to write lock it, and release the semaphore and reschedule if there is contention, so as to avoid causing any significant delays to transaction commits. This leaves some room for optimizations for send to have less path releases and re searching the trees when there's relocation running, but for now it's kept simple as it performs quite well (on very large trees with resulting send streams in the order of a few hundred gigabytes). Test case btrfs/187, from fstests, stresses relocation, send and deduplication attempting to run in parallel, but without verifying if send succeeds and if it produces correct streams. A new test case will be added that exercises relocation happening in parallel with send and then checks that send succeeds and the resulting streams are correct. A final note is that for now this still leaves the mutual exclusion between send operations and deduplication on files belonging to a root used by send operations. A solution for that will be slightly more complex but it will eventually be built on top of this change. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Anand Jain Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

btrfs: do not start relocation until in progress drops are done

2022-03-08T18:14:19Z

commit b4be6aefa73c9a6899ef3ba9c5faaa8a66e333ef upstream. We hit a bug with a recovering relocation on mount for one of our file systems in production. I reproduced this locally by injecting errors into snapshot delete with balance running at the same time. This presented as an error while looking up an extent item WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1501 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:866 lookup_inline_extent_backref+0x647/0x680 CPU: 5 PID: 1501 Comm: btrfs-balance Not tainted 5.16.0-rc8+ #8 RIP: 0010:lookup_inline_extent_backref+0x647/0x680 RSP: 0018:ffffae0a023ab960 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000000c RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffff943fd2a39b60 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 0001434088152de0 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000001d05000 R13: ffff943fd2a39b60 R14: ffff943fdb96f2a0 R15: ffff9442fc923000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff944e9eb40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f1157b1fca8 CR3: 000000010f092000 CR4: 0000000000350ee0 Call Trace: insert_inline_extent_backref+0x46/0xd0 __btrfs_inc_extent_ref.isra.0+0x5f/0x200 ? btrfs_merge_delayed_refs+0x164/0x190 __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x561/0xfa0 ? btrfs_search_slot+0x7b4/0xb30 ? btrfs_update_root+0x1a9/0x2c0 btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x73/0x1f0 ? btrfs_update_root+0x1a9/0x2c0 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x50/0xa50 ? btrfs_update_reloc_root+0x122/0x220 prepare_to_merge+0x29f/0x320 relocate_block_group+0x2b8/0x550 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x1a6/0x350 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x27/0xe0 btrfs_balance+0x777/0xe60 balance_kthread+0x35/0x50 ? btrfs_balance+0xe60/0xe60 kthread+0x16b/0x190 ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 Normally snapshot deletion and relocation are excluded from running at the same time by the fs_info->cleaner_mutex. However if we had a pending balance waiting to get the ->cleaner_mutex, and a snapshot deletion was running, and then the box crashed, we would come up in a state where we have a half deleted snapshot. Again, in the normal case the snapshot deletion needs to complete before relocation can start, but in this case relocation could very well start before the snapshot deletion completes, as we simply add the root to the dead roots list and wait for the next time the cleaner runs to clean up the snapshot. Fix this by setting a bit on the fs_info if we have any DEAD_ROOT's that had a pending drop_progress key. If they do then we know we were in the middle of the drop operation and set a flag on the fs_info. Then balance can wait until this flag is cleared to start up again. If there are DEAD_ROOT's that don't have a drop_progress set then we're safe to start balance right away as we'll be properly protected by the cleaner_mutex. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

btrfs: fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modifications

2021-10-26T17:08:07Z

When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and it is not in the context of a chunk allocation or a chunk removal, it can deadlock with another task that is currently allocating a new data or metadata chunk. These contexts are the following: * When relocating a system chunk, when we need to COW the extent buffers that belong to the chunk btree; * When adding a new device (ioctl), where we need to add a new device item to the chunk btree; * When removing a device (ioctl), where we need to remove a device item from the chunk btree; * When resizing a device (ioctl), where we need to update a device item in the chunk btree and may need to relocate a system chunk that lies beyond the new device size when shrinking a device. The problem happens due to a sequence of steps like the following: 1) Task A starts a data or metadata chunk allocation and it locks the chunk mutex; 2) Task B is relocating a system chunk, and when it needs to COW an extent buffer of the chunk btree, it has locked both that extent buffer as well as its parent extent buffer; 3) Since there is not enough available system space, either because none of the existing system block groups have enough free space or because the only one with enough free space is in RO mode due to the relocation, task B triggers a new system chunk allocation. It blocks when trying to acquire the chunk mutex, currently held by task A; 4) Task A enters btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item(), in order to insert the new chunk item into the chunk btree and update the existing device items there. But in order to do that, it has to lock the extent buffer that task B locked at step 2, or its parent extent buffer, but task B is waiting on the chunk mutex, which is currently locked by task A, therefore resulting in a deadlock. One example report when the deadlock happens with system chunk relocation: INFO: task kworker/u9:5:546 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:kworker/u9:5 state:D stack:25936 pid: 546 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline] __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287 schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366 rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x4ee/0x9d0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:993 __down_read_common kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1214 [inline] __down_read kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1223 [inline] down_read_nested+0xe6/0x440 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1590 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x31/0x350 fs/btrfs/locking.c:47 btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:54 [inline] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x8a/0x320 fs/btrfs/locking.c:191 btrfs_search_slot_get_root fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1623 [inline] btrfs_search_slot+0x13b4/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1728 btrfs_update_device+0x11f/0x500 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2794 btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item+0x34d/0xea0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5504 do_chunk_alloc fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3408 [inline] btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x84d/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3653 flush_space+0x54e/0xd80 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:670 btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x396/0xa90 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:953 process_one_work+0x9df/0x16d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2297 worker_thread+0x90/0xed0 kernel/workqueue.c:2444 kthread+0x3e5/0x4d0 kernel/kthread.c:319 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295 INFO: task syz-executor:9107 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz-executor state:D stack:23200 pid: 9107 ppid: 7792 flags:0x00004004 Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline] __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287 schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366 schedule_preempt_disabled+0xf/0x20 kernel/sched/core.c:6425 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:669 [inline] __mutex_lock+0xc96/0x1680 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x31a/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3631 find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3986 [inline] find_free_extent+0x25cb/0x3a30 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4335 btrfs_reserve_extent+0x1f1/0x500 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4415 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x203/0x1120 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4813 __btrfs_cow_block+0x412/0x1620 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:415 btrfs_cow_block+0x2f6/0x8c0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:570 btrfs_search_slot+0x1094/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1768 relocate_tree_block fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2694 [inline] relocate_tree_blocks+0xf73/0x1770 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2757 relocate_block_group+0x47e/0xc70 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3673 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x48a/0xc60 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4070 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x96/0x280 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3181 __btrfs_balance fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3911 [inline] btrfs_balance+0x1f03/0x3cd0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4301 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x61e/0x800 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4137 btrfs_ioctl+0x39ea/0x7b70 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4949 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae So fix this by making sure that whenever we try to modify the chunk btree and we are neither in a chunk allocation context nor in a chunk remove context, we reserve system space before modifying the chunk btree. Reported-by: Hao Sun Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CACkBjsax51i4mu6C0C3vJqQN3NR_iVuucoeG3U1HXjrgzn5FFQ@mail.gmail.com/ Fixes: 79bd37120b1495 ("btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.14+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: pull up qgroup checks from delayed-ref core to init time

2021-10-26T17:08:06Z

Instead of checking whether qgroup processing for a dealyed ref has to happen in the core of delayed ref, simply pull the check at init time of respective delayed ref structures. This eliminates the final use of real_root in delayed-ref core paving the way to making this member optional. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: add additional parameters to btrfs_init_tree_ref/btrfs_init_data_ref

2021-10-26T17:08:06Z

In order to make 'real_root' used only in ref-verify it's required to have the necessary context to perform the same checks that this member is used for. So add 'mod_root' which will contain the root on behalf of which a delayed ref was created and a 'skip_group' parameter which will contain callsite-specific override of skip_qgroup. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: rename setup_extent_mapping in relocation code

2021-10-26T17:08:01Z

In btrfs code we have two functions called setup_extent_mapping, one in the extent_map code and one in the relocation code. While both are private to their respective implementation, this can still be confusing for the reader. So rename the version in relocation.c to setup_relocation_extent_mapping. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: zoned: allow preallocation for relocation inodes

2021-10-26T17:08:01Z

Now that we use a dedicated block group and regular writes for data relocation, we can preallocate the space needed for a relocated inode, just like we do in regular mode. Essentially this reverts commit 32430c614844 ("btrfs: zoned: enable relocation on a zoned filesystem") as it is not needed anymore. Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: introduce btrfs_is_data_reloc_root

2021-10-26T17:08:01Z

There are several places in our codebase where we check if a root is the root of the data reloc tree and subsequent patches will introduce more. Factor out the check into a small helper function instead of open coding it multiple times. Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: zoned: finish relocating block group

2021-10-26T17:08:00Z

We will no longer write to a relocating block group. So, we can finish it now. Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: subpage: fix relocation potentially overwriting last page data

2021-08-23T11:19:06Z

[BUG] When using the following script, btrfs will report data corruption after one data balance with subpage support: mkfs.btrfs -f -s 4k $dev mount $dev -o nospace_cache $mnt $fsstress -w -n 8 -s 1620948986 -d $mnt/ -v > /tmp/fsstress sync btrfs balance start -d $mnt btrfs scrub start -B $mnt Similar problem can be easily observed in btrfs/028 test case, there will be tons of balance failure with -EIO. [CAUSE] Above fsstress will result the following data extents layout in extent tree: item 10 key (13631488 EXTENT_ITEM 98304) itemoff 15889 itemsize 82 refs 2 gen 7 flags DATA extent data backref root FS_TREE objectid 259 offset 1339392 count 1 extent data backref root FS_TREE objectid 259 offset 647168 count 1 item 11 key (13631488 BLOCK_GROUP_ITEM 8388608) itemoff 15865 itemsize 24 block group used 102400 chunk_objectid 256 flags DATA item 12 key (13733888 EXTENT_ITEM 4096) itemoff 15812 itemsize 53 refs 1 gen 7 flags DATA extent data backref root FS_TREE objectid 259 offset 729088 count 1 Then when creating the data reloc inode, the data reloc inode will look like this: 0 32K 64K 96K 100K 104K |<------ Extent A ----->| |<- Ext B ->| Then when we first try to relocate extent A, we setup the data reloc inode with i_size 96K, then read both page [0, 64K) and page [64K, 128K). For page 64K, since the i_size is just 96K, we fill range [96K, 128K) with 0 and set it uptodate. Then when we come to extent B, we update i_size to 104K, then try to read page [64K, 128K). Then we find the page is already uptodate, so we skip the read. But range [96K, 128K) is filled with 0, not the real data. Then we writeback the data reloc inode to disk, with 0 filling range [96K, 128K), corrupting the content of extent B. The behavior is caused by the fact that we still do full page read for subpage case. The bug won't really happen for regular sectorsize, as one page only contains one sector. [FIX] This patch will fix the problem by invalidating range [i_size, PAGE_END] in prealloc_file_extent_cluster(). So that if above example happens, when we preallocate the file extent for extent B, we will clear the uptodate bits for range [96K, 128K), allowing later relocate_one_page() to re-read the needed range. There is a special note for the invalidating part. Since we're not calling real btrfs_invalidatepage(), but just clearing the subpage and page uptodate bits, we can leave a page half dirty and half out of date. Reading such page can cause a deadlock, as we normally expect a dirty page to be fully uptodate. Thus here we flush and wait the data reloc inode before doing the hacked invalidating. This won't cause extra overhead, as we're going to writeback the data later anyway. Reported-by: Ritesh Harjani Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo Signed-off-by: David Sterba