kernel.git/fs/btrfs/relocation.c, branch linux-5.12.y

btrfs: convert logic BUG_ON()'s in replace_path to ASSERT()'s

2021-05-12T06:39:40Z

[ Upstream commit 7a9213a93546e7eaef90e6e153af6b8fc7553f10 ] A few BUG_ON()'s in replace_path are purely to keep us from making logical mistakes, so replace them with ASSERT()'s. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

btrfs: do proper error handling in btrfs_update_reloc_root

2021-05-12T06:39:40Z

[ Upstream commit 592fbcd50c99b8adf999a2a54f9245caff333139 ] We call btrfs_update_root in btrfs_update_reloc_root, which can fail for all sorts of reasons, including IO errors. Instead of panicing the box lets return the error, now that all callers properly handle those errors. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

btrfs: do proper error handling in create_reloc_root

2021-05-12T06:39:40Z

[ Upstream commit 84c50ba5214c2f3c1be4a931d521ec19f55dfdc8 ] We do memory allocations here, read blocks from disk, all sorts of operations that could easily fail at any given point. Instead of panicing the box, simply return the error back up the chain, all callers at this point have proper error handling. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

btrfs: use btrfs_inode_lock/btrfs_inode_unlock inode lock helpers

2021-05-12T06:39:40Z

[ Upstream commit 64708539cd23b31d0f235a2c12a0cf782f95908a ] A few places we intermix btrfs_inode_lock with a inode_unlock, and some places we just use inode_lock/inode_unlock instead of btrfs_inode_lock. None of these places are using this incorrectly, but as we adjust some of these callers it would be nice to keep everything consistent, so convert everybody to use btrfs_inode_lock/btrfs_inode_unlock. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

btrfs: zoned: enable relocation on a zoned filesystem

2021-02-09T01:46:07Z

Currently fallocate() is disabled on a zoned filesystem. Since current relocation process relies on preallocation to move file data extents, it must be handled differently. On a zoned filesystem, we just truncate the inode to the size that we wanted to pre-allocate. Then, we flush dirty pages on the file before finishing the relocation process. run_delalloc_zoned() will handle all the allocations and submit IOs to the underlying layers. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: introduce btrfs_subpage for data inodes

2021-02-08T21:59:03Z

To support subpage sector size, data also need extra info to make sure which sectors in a page are uptodate/dirty/... This patch will make pages for data inodes get btrfs_subpage structure attached, and detached when the page is freed. This patch also slightly changes the timing when set_page_extent_mapped() is called to make sure: - We have page->mapping set page->mapping->host is used to grab btrfs_fs_info, thus we can only call this function after page is mapped to an inode. One call site attaches pages to inode manually, thus we have to modify the timing of set_page_extent_mapped() a bit. - As soon as possible, before other operations Since memory allocation can fail, we have to do extra error handling. Calling set_page_extent_mapped() as soon as possible can simply the error handling for several call sites. The idea is pretty much the same as iomap_page, but with more bitmaps for btrfs specific cases. Currently the plan is to switch iomap if iomap can provide sector aligned write back (only write back dirty sectors, but not the full page, data balance require this feature). So we will stick to btrfs specific bitmap for now. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: fix reloc root leak with 0 ref reloc roots on recovery

2021-02-08T21:58:55Z

When recovering a relocation, if we run into a reloc root that has 0 refs we simply add it to the reloc_control->reloc_roots list, and then clean it up later. The problem with this is __del_reloc_root() doesn't do anything if the root isn't in the radix tree, which in this case it won't be because we never call __add_reloc_root() on the reloc_root. This exit condition simply isn't correct really. During normal operation we can remove ourselves from the rb tree and then we're meant to clean up later at merge_reloc_roots() time, and this happens correctly. During recovery we're depending on free_reloc_roots() to drop our references, but we're short-circuiting. Fix this by continuing to check if we're on the list and dropping ourselves from the reloc_control root list and dropping our reference appropriately. Change the corresponding BUG_ON() to an ASSERT() that does the correct thing if we aren't in the rb tree. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: keep track of the root owner for relocation reads

2021-02-08T21:58:52Z

While testing the error paths in relocation, I hit the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.10.0-rc3+ #206 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ btrfs-balance/1571 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8cdbcc8f77d0 (&head_ref->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0 but task is already holding lock: ffff8cdbc54adbf8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}: down_write_nested+0x43/0x80 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100 btrfs_search_slot+0x248/0x890 relocate_tree_blocks+0x490/0x650 relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0 kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50 -> #1 (btrfs-csum-01){++++}-{3:3}: down_read_nested+0x43/0x130 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x27/0x100 btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40 btrfs_search_slot+0x5ab/0x890 btrfs_del_csums+0x10b/0x3c0 __btrfs_free_extent+0x49d/0x8e0 __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x283/0x11f0 btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x86/0x220 btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x2ba/0x520 kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50 -> #0 (&head_ref->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150 lock_acquire+0x116/0x3e0 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0 btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0 walk_down_proc+0x1c3/0x280 walk_down_tree+0x64/0xe0 btrfs_drop_subtree+0x182/0x260 do_relocation+0x52e/0x660 relocate_tree_blocks+0x2ae/0x650 relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0 kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &head_ref->mutex --> btrfs-csum-01 --> btrfs-tree-00 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(btrfs-tree-00); lock(btrfs-csum-01); lock(btrfs-tree-00); lock(&head_ref->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 5 locks held by btrfs-balance/1571: #0: ffff8cdb89749ff8 (&fs_info->delete_unused_bgs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_balance+0x563/0xf40 #1: ffff8cdb89748838 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x156/0x300 #2: ffff8cdbc2c16650 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x413/0x5c0 #3: ffff8cdbc135f538 (btrfs-treloc-01){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100 #4: ffff8cdbc54adbf8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 1571 Comm: btrfs-balance Not tainted 5.10.0-rc3+ #206 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 ? trace_call_bpf+0x139/0x260 __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150 lock_acquire+0x116/0x3e0 ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0 ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0 ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0 ? release_extent_buffer+0x124/0x170 ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x30 ? release_extent_buffer+0x124/0x170 btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0 walk_down_proc+0x1c3/0x280 walk_down_tree+0x64/0xe0 btrfs_drop_subtree+0x182/0x260 do_relocation+0x52e/0x660 relocate_tree_blocks+0x2ae/0x650 ? add_tree_block+0x149/0x1b0 relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0 elfcorehdr_read+0x40/0x40 ? elfcorehdr_read+0x40/0x40 ? btrfs_balance+0x796/0xf40 ? __kthread_parkme+0x66/0x90 ? btrfs_balance+0xf40/0xf40 ? balance_kthread+0x37/0x50 ? kthread+0x137/0x150 ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60 ? ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 As you can see this is bogus, we never take another tree's lock under the csum lock. This happens because sometimes we have to read tree blocks from disk without knowing which root they belong to during relocation. We defaulted to an owner of 0, which translates to an fs tree. This is fine as all fs trees have the same class, but obviously isn't fine if the block belongs to a COW only tree. Thankfully COW only trees only have their owners root as a reference to them, and since we already look up the extent information during relocation, go ahead and check and see if this block might belong to a COW only tree, and if so save the owner in the tree_block struct. This allows us to read_tree_block with the proper owner, which gets rid of this lockdep splat. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: noinline btrfs_should_cancel_balance

2021-02-08T21:58:50Z

I was attempting to reproduce a problem that Zygo hit, but my error injection wasn't firing for a few of the common calls to btrfs_should_cancel_balance. This is because the compiler decided to inline it at these spots. Keep this from happening by explicitly marking the function as noinline so that error injection will always work. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: rename btrfs_find_free_objectid to btrfs_get_free_objectid

2021-02-08T21:58:49Z

This better reflects the semantics of the function i.e no search is performed whatsoever. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba