kernel.git/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c, branch linux-6.5.y

btrfs: abort transaction on generation mismatch when marking eb as dirty

2023-11-28T17:14:40Z

[ Upstream commit 50564b651d01c19ce732819c5b3c3fd60707188e ] When marking an extent buffer as dirty, at btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(), we check if its generation matches the running transaction and if not we just print a warning. Such mismatch is an indicator that something really went wrong and only printing a warning message (and stack trace) is not enough to prevent a corruption. Allowing a transaction to commit with such an extent buffer will trigger an error if we ever try to read it from disk due to a generation mismatch with its parent generation. So abort the current transaction with -EUCLEAN if we notice a generation mismatch. For this we need to pass a transaction handle to btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() which is always available except in test code, in which case we can pass NULL since it operates on dummy extent buffers and all test roots have a single node/leaf (root node at level 0). Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

btrfs: use u64 for buffer sizes in the tree search ioctls

2023-11-20T10:57:26Z

[ Upstream commit dec96fc2dcb59723e041416b8dc53e011b4bfc2e ] In the tree search v2 ioctl we use the type size_t, which is an unsigned long, to track the buffer size in the local variable 'buf_size'. An unsigned long is 32 bits wide on a 32 bits architecture. The buffer size defined in struct btrfs_ioctl_search_args_v2 is a u64, so when we later try to copy the local variable 'buf_size' to the argument struct, when the search returns -EOVERFLOW, we copy only 32 bits which will be a problem on big endian systems. Fix this by using a u64 type for the buffer sizes, not only at btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2(), but also everywhere down the call chain so that we can use the u64 at btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2(). Fixes: cc68a8a5a433 ("btrfs: new ioctl TREE_SEARCH_V2") Reported-by: Dan Carpenter Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/ce6f4bd6-9453-4ffe-ba00-cee35495e10f@moroto.mountain/ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

btrfs: fix some -Wmaybe-uninitialized warnings in ioctl.c

2023-10-25T10:16:19Z

[ Upstream commit 9147b9ded499d9853bdf0e9804b7eaa99c4429ed ] Jens reported the following warnings from -Wmaybe-uninitialized recent Linus' branch. In file included from ./include/asm-generic/rwonce.h:26, from ./arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h:71, from ./include/linux/compiler.h:246, from ./include/linux/export.h:5, from ./include/linux/linkage.h:7, from ./include/linux/kernel.h:17, from fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:6: In function ‘instrument_copy_from_user_before’, inlined from ‘_copy_from_user’ at ./include/linux/uaccess.h:148:3, inlined from ‘copy_from_user’ at ./include/linux/uaccess.h:183:7, inlined from ‘btrfs_ioctl_space_info’ at fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:2999:6, inlined from ‘btrfs_ioctl’ at fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4616:10: ./include/linux/kasan-checks.h:38:27: warning: ‘space_args’ may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] 38 | #define kasan_check_write __kasan_check_write ./include/linux/instrumented.h:129:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘kasan_check_write’ 129 | kasan_check_write(to, n); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ./include/linux/kasan-checks.h: In function ‘btrfs_ioctl’: ./include/linux/kasan-checks.h:20:6: note: by argument 1 of type ‘const volatile void *’ to ‘__kasan_check_write’ declared here 20 | bool __kasan_check_write(const volatile void *p, unsigned int size); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:2981:39: note: ‘space_args’ declared here 2981 | struct btrfs_ioctl_space_args space_args; | ^~~~~~~~~~ In function ‘instrument_copy_from_user_before’, inlined from ‘_copy_from_user’ at ./include/linux/uaccess.h:148:3, inlined from ‘copy_from_user’ at ./include/linux/uaccess.h:183:7, inlined from ‘_btrfs_ioctl_send’ at fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4343:9, inlined from ‘btrfs_ioctl’ at fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4658:10: ./include/linux/kasan-checks.h:38:27: warning: ‘args32’ may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] 38 | #define kasan_check_write __kasan_check_write ./include/linux/instrumented.h:129:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘kasan_check_write’ 129 | kasan_check_write(to, n); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ./include/linux/kasan-checks.h: In function ‘btrfs_ioctl’: ./include/linux/kasan-checks.h:20:6: note: by argument 1 of type ‘const volatile void *’ to ‘__kasan_check_write’ declared here 20 | bool __kasan_check_write(const volatile void *p, unsigned int size); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4341:49: note: ‘args32’ declared here 4341 | struct btrfs_ioctl_send_args_32 args32; | ^~~~~~ This was due to his config options and having KASAN turned on, which adds some extra checks around copy_from_user(), which then triggered the -Wmaybe-uninitialized checker for these cases. Fix the warnings by initializing the different structs we're copying into. Reported-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

btrfs: release path before inode lookup during the ino lookup ioctl

2023-09-23T09:14:35Z

commit ee34a82e890a7babb5585daf1a6dd7d4d1cf142a upstream. During the ino lookup ioctl we can end up calling btrfs_iget() to get an inode reference while we are holding on a root's btree. If btrfs_iget() needs to lookup the inode from the root's btree, because it's not currently loaded in memory, then it will need to lock another or the same path in the same root btree. This may result in a deadlock and trigger the following lockdep splat: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.5.0-rc7-syzkaller-00004-gf7757129e3de #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor277/5012 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88802df41710 (btrfs-tree-01){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x2f/0x220 fs/btrfs/locking.c:136 but task is already holding lock: ffff88802df418e8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x2f/0x220 fs/btrfs/locking.c:136 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}: down_read_nested+0x49/0x2f0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1645 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x2f/0x220 fs/btrfs/locking.c:136 btrfs_search_slot+0x13a4/0x2f80 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2302 btrfs_init_root_free_objectid+0x148/0x320 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:4955 btrfs_init_fs_root fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1128 [inline] btrfs_get_root_ref+0x5ae/0xae0 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1338 btrfs_get_fs_root fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1390 [inline] open_ctree+0x29c8/0x3030 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:3494 btrfs_fill_super+0x1c7/0x2f0 fs/btrfs/super.c:1154 btrfs_mount_root+0x7e0/0x910 fs/btrfs/super.c:1519 legacy_get_tree+0xef/0x190 fs/fs_context.c:611 vfs_get_tree+0x8c/0x270 fs/super.c:1519 fc_mount fs/namespace.c:1112 [inline] vfs_kern_mount+0xbc/0x150 fs/namespace.c:1142 btrfs_mount+0x39f/0xb50 fs/btrfs/super.c:1579 legacy_get_tree+0xef/0x190 fs/fs_context.c:611 vfs_get_tree+0x8c/0x270 fs/super.c:1519 do_new_mount+0x28f/0xae0 fs/namespace.c:3335 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3675 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3884 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x2d9/0x3c0 fs/namespace.c:3861 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd -> #0 (btrfs-tree-01){++++}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x39ff/0x7f70 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144 lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 down_read_nested+0x49/0x2f0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1645 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x2f/0x220 fs/btrfs/locking.c:136 btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:142 [inline] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x292/0x3c0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:281 btrfs_search_slot_get_root fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1832 [inline] btrfs_search_slot+0x4ff/0x2f80 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2154 btrfs_lookup_inode+0xdc/0x480 fs/btrfs/inode-item.c:412 btrfs_read_locked_inode fs/btrfs/inode.c:3892 [inline] btrfs_iget_path+0x2d9/0x1520 fs/btrfs/inode.c:5716 btrfs_search_path_in_tree_user fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1961 [inline] btrfs_ioctl_ino_lookup_user+0x77a/0xf50 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:2105 btrfs_ioctl+0xb0b/0xd40 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4683 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xf8/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:856 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- rlock(btrfs-tree-00); lock(btrfs-tree-01); lock(btrfs-tree-00); rlock(btrfs-tree-01); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by syz-executor277/5012: #0: ffff88802df418e8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x2f/0x220 fs/btrfs/locking.c:136 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 5012 Comm: syz-executor277 Not tainted 6.5.0-rc7-syzkaller-00004-gf7757129e3de #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/26/2023 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:106 check_noncircular+0x375/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2195 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x39ff/0x7f70 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144 lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 down_read_nested+0x49/0x2f0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1645 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x2f/0x220 fs/btrfs/locking.c:136 btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:142 [inline] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x292/0x3c0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:281 btrfs_search_slot_get_root fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1832 [inline] btrfs_search_slot+0x4ff/0x2f80 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2154 btrfs_lookup_inode+0xdc/0x480 fs/btrfs/inode-item.c:412 btrfs_read_locked_inode fs/btrfs/inode.c:3892 [inline] btrfs_iget_path+0x2d9/0x1520 fs/btrfs/inode.c:5716 btrfs_search_path_in_tree_user fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1961 [inline] btrfs_ioctl_ino_lookup_user+0x77a/0xf50 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:2105 btrfs_ioctl+0xb0b/0xd40 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4683 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xf8/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:856 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd RIP: 0033:0x7f0bec94ea39 Fix this simply by releasing the path before calling btrfs_iget() as at point we don't need the path anymore. Reported-by: syzbot+bf66ad948981797d2f1d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/00000000000045fa140603c4a969@google.com/ Fixes: 23d0b79dfaed ("btrfs: Add unprivileged version of ino_lookup ioctl") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

Merge tag 'for-6.5/block-2023-06-23' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux

2023-06-26T19:47:20Z

Pull block updates from Jens Axboe: - NVMe pull request via Keith: - Various cleanups all around (Irvin, Chaitanya, Christophe) - Better struct packing (Christophe JAILLET) - Reduce controller error logs for optional commands (Keith) - Support for >=64KiB block sizes (Daniel Gomez) - Fabrics fixes and code organization (Max, Chaitanya, Daniel Wagner) - bcache updates via Coly: - Fix a race at init time (Mingzhe Zou) - Misc fixes and cleanups (Andrea, Thomas, Zheng, Ye) - use page pinning in the block layer for dio (David) - convert old block dio code to page pinning (David, Christoph) - cleanups for pktcdvd (Andy) - cleanups for rnbd (Guoqing) - use the unchecked __bio_add_page() for the initial single page additions (Johannes) - fix overflows in the Amiga partition handling code (Michael) - improve mq-deadline zoned device support (Bart) - keep passthrough requests out of the IO schedulers (Christoph, Ming) - improve support for flush requests, making them less special to deal with (Christoph) - add bdev holder ops and shutdown methods (Christoph) - fix the name_to_dev_t() situation and use cases (Christoph) - decouple the block open flags from fmode_t (Christoph) - ublk updates and cleanups, including adding user copy support (Ming) - BFQ sanity checking (Bart) - convert brd from radix to xarray (Pankaj) - constify various structures (Thomas, Ivan) - more fine grained persistent reservation ioctl capability checks (Jingbo) - misc fixes and cleanups (Arnd, Azeem, Demi, Ed, Hengqi, Hou, Jan, Jordy, Li, Min, Yu, Zhong, Waiman) * tag 'for-6.5/block-2023-06-23' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux: (266 commits) scsi/sg: don't grab scsi host module reference ext4: Fix warning in blkdev_put() block: don't return -EINVAL for not found names in devt_from_devname cdrom: Fix spectre-v1 gadget block: Improve kernel-doc headers blk-mq: don't insert passthrough request into sw queue bsg: make bsg_class a static const structure ublk: make ublk_chr_class a static const structure aoe: make aoe_class a static const structure block/rnbd: make all 'class' structures const block: fix the exclusive open mask in disk_scan_partitions block: add overflow checks for Amiga partition support block: change all __u32 annotations to __be32 in affs_hardblocks.h block: fix signed int overflow in Amiga partition support block: add capacity validation in bdev_add_partition() block: fine-granular CAP_SYS_ADMIN for Persistent Reservation block: disallow Persistent Reservation on partitions reiserfs: fix blkdev_put() warning from release_journal_dev() block: fix wrong mode for blkdev_get_by_dev() from disk_scan_partitions() block: document the holder argument to blkdev_get_by_path ...

btrfs: trigger orphan inode cleanup during START_SYNC ioctl

2023-06-19T11:59:26Z

There is an internal error report that scrub found an error in an orphan inode's data. However there are very limited ways to cleanup such orphan inodes: - btrfs_start_pre_rw_mount() This happens at either mount, or RO->RW switch. This is not a viable solution for root fs which may not be unmounted or RO mounted. Furthermore this doesn't cover every subvolume, it only covers the currently cached subvolumes. - btrfs_lookup_dentry() This happens when we first lookup the subvolume dentry. But dentry can be cached thus it's not ensured to be triggered every time. - create_snapshot() This only happens for the created snapshot, not the source one. This means if we didn't trigger orphan items cleanup, there is really no other way to manually trigger it. Add this step to the START_SYNC ioctl. This is a slight change in the semantics of the ioctl but as sync can be potentially slow and is usually paired with WAIT_SYNC ioctl. The errors are not handled because the main point of the ioctl is the async commit, orphan cleanup is a side effect. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: simplify transid initialization in btrfs_ioctl_wait_sync

2023-06-19T11:59:23Z

A small code simplification, move the default value of transid to its initialization and remove the else-statement. Signed-off-by: Tom Rix Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: don't commit transaction for every subvol create

2023-06-19T11:59:22Z

Recently a Meta-internal workload encountered subvolume creation taking up to 2s each, significantly slower than directory creation. As they were hoping to be able to use subvolumes instead of directories, and were looking to create hundreds, this was a significant issue. After Josef investigated, it turned out to be due to the transaction commit currently performed at the end of subvolume creation. This change improves the workload by not doing transaction commit for every subvolume creation, and merely requiring a transaction commit on fsync. In the worst case, of doing a subvolume create and fsync in a loop, this should require an equal amount of time to the current scheme; and in the best case, the internal workload creating hundreds of subvolumes before fsyncing is greatly improved. While it would be nice to be able to use the log tree and use the normal fsync path, log tree replay can't deal with new subvolume inodes presently. It's possible that there's some reason that the transaction commit is necessary for correctness during subvolume creation; however, git logs indicate that the commit dates back to the beginning of subvolume creation, and there are no notes on why it would be necessary. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: Neal Gompa Signed-off-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba

block: use the holder as indication for exclusive opens

2023-06-12T14:04:04Z

The current interface for exclusive opens is rather confusing as it requires both the FMODE_EXCL flag and a holder. Remove the need to pass FMODE_EXCL and just key off the exclusive open off a non-NULL holder. For blkdev_put this requires adding the holder argument, which provides better debug checking that only the holder actually releases the hold, but at the same time allows removing the now superfluous mode argument. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke Acked-by: Christian Brauner Acked-by: David Sterba [btrfs] Acked-by: Jack Wang [rnbd] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230608110258.189493-16-hch@lst.de Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe

btrfs: fix assertion of exclop condition when starting balance

2023-04-28T14:36:27Z

Balance as exclusive state is compatible with paused balance and device add, which makes some things more complicated. The assertion of valid states when starting from paused balance needs to take into account two more states, the combinations can be hit when there are several threads racing to start balance and device add. This won't typically happen when the commands are started from command line. Scenario 1: With exclusive_operation state == BTRFS_EXCLOP_NONE. Concurrently adding multiple devices to the same mount point and btrfs_exclop_finish executed finishes before assertion in btrfs_exclop_balance, exclusive_operation will changed to BTRFS_EXCLOP_NONE state which lead to assertion failed: fs_info->exclusive_operation == BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE || fs_info->exclusive_operation == BTRFS_EXCLOP_DEV_ADD, in fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:456 Call Trace: btrfs_exclop_balance+0x13c/0x310 ? memdup_user+0xab/0xc0 ? PTR_ERR+0x17/0x20 btrfs_ioctl_add_dev+0x2ee/0x320 btrfs_ioctl+0x9d5/0x10d0 ? btrfs_ioctl_encoded_write+0xb80/0xb80 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x197/0x210 do_syscall_64+0x3c/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd Scenario 2: With exclusive_operation state == BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE_PAUSED. Concurrently adding multiple devices to the same mount point and btrfs_exclop_balance executed finish before the latter thread execute assertion in btrfs_exclop_balance, exclusive_operation will changed to BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE_PAUSED state which lead to assertion failed: fs_info->exclusive_operation == BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE || fs_info->exclusive_operation == BTRFS_EXCLOP_DEV_ADD || fs_info->exclusive_operation == BTRFS_EXCLOP_NONE, fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:458 Call Trace: btrfs_exclop_balance+0x240/0x410 ? memdup_user+0xab/0xc0 ? PTR_ERR+0x17/0x20 btrfs_ioctl_add_dev+0x2ee/0x320 btrfs_ioctl+0x9d5/0x10d0 ? btrfs_ioctl_encoded_write+0xb80/0xb80 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x197/0x210 do_syscall_64+0x3c/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd An example of the failed assertion is below, which shows that the paused balance is also needed to be checked. root@syzkaller:/home/xsk# ./repro Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14 Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14 Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14 Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14 Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14 Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14 Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14 Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14 Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14 [ 416.611428][ T7970] BTRFS info (device loop0): fs_info exclusive_operation: 0 Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14 [ 416.613973][ T7971] BTRFS info (device loop0): fs_info exclusive_operation: 3 Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14 [ 416.615456][ T7972] BTRFS info (device loop0): fs_info exclusive_operation: 3 Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14 [ 416.617528][ T7973] BTRFS info (device loop0): fs_info exclusive_operation: 3 Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14 [ 416.618359][ T7974] BTRFS info (device loop0): fs_info exclusive_operation: 3 Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14 [ 416.622589][ T7975] BTRFS info (device loop0): fs_info exclusive_operation: 3 Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14 [ 416.624034][ T7976] BTRFS info (device loop0): fs_info exclusive_operation: 3 Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14 [ 416.626420][ T7977] BTRFS info (device loop0): fs_info exclusive_operation: 3 Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14 [ 416.627643][ T7978] BTRFS info (device loop0): fs_info exclusive_operation: 3 Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14 [ 416.629006][ T7979] BTRFS info (device loop0): fs_info exclusive_operation: 3 [ 416.630298][ T7980] BTRFS info (device loop0): fs_info exclusive_operation: 3 Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14 Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14 [ 416.632787][ T7981] BTRFS info (device loop0): fs_info exclusive_operation: 3 Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14 [ 416.634282][ T7982] BTRFS info (device loop0): fs_info exclusive_operation: 3 Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14 [ 416.636202][ T7983] BTRFS info (device loop0): fs_info exclusive_operation: 3 [ 416.637012][ T7984] BTRFS info (device loop0): fs_info exclusive_operation: 1 Failed to add device /dev/vda, errno 14 [ 416.637759][ T7984] assertion failed: fs_info->exclusive_operation == BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE || fs_info->exclusive_operation == BTRFS_EXCLOP_DEV_ADD || fs_info->exclusive_operation == BTRFS_EXCLOP_NONE, in fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:458 [ 416.639845][ T7984] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN [ 416.640485][ T7984] CPU: 0 PID: 7984 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.2.0 #7 [ 416.641172][ T7984] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 [ 416.642090][ T7984] RIP: 0010:btrfs_assertfail+0x2c/0x2e [ 416.644423][ T7984] RSP: 0018:ffffc90003ea7e28 EFLAGS: 00010282 [ 416.645018][ T7984] RAX: 00000000000000cc RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 416.645763][ T7984] RDX: ffff88801d030000 RSI: ffffffff81637e7c RDI: fffff520007d4fb7 [ 416.646554][ T7984] RBP: ffffffff8a533de0 R08: 00000000000000cc R09: 0000000000000000 [ 416.647299][ T7984] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffffffff8a533da0 [ 416.648041][ T7984] R13: 00000000000001ca R14: 000000005000940a R15: 0000000000000000 [ 416.648785][ T7984] FS: 00007fa2985d4640(0000) GS:ffff88802cc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 416.649616][ T7984] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 416.650238][ T7984] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000018e5e000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0 [ 416.650980][ T7984] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 416.651725][ T7984] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 416.652502][ T7984] PKRU: 55555554 [ 416.652888][ T7984] Call Trace: [ 416.653241][ T7984] [ 416.653527][ T7984] btrfs_exclop_balance+0x240/0x410 [ 416.654036][ T7984] ? memdup_user+0xab/0xc0 [ 416.654465][ T7984] ? PTR_ERR+0x17/0x20 [ 416.654874][ T7984] btrfs_ioctl_add_dev+0x2ee/0x320 [ 416.655380][ T7984] btrfs_ioctl+0x9d5/0x10d0 [ 416.655822][ T7984] ? btrfs_ioctl_encoded_write+0xb80/0xb80 [ 416.656400][ T7984] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x197/0x210 [ 416.656874][ T7984] do_syscall_64+0x3c/0xb0 [ 416.657346][ T7984] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [ 416.657922][ T7984] RIP: 0033:0x4546af [ 416.660170][ T7984] RSP: 002b:00007fa2985d4150 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [ 416.660972][ T7984] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fa2985d4640 RCX: 00000000004546af [ 416.661714][ T7984] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000005000940a RDI: 0000000000000003 [ 416.662449][ T7984] RBP: 00007fa2985d41d0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007ffee37a4c4f [ 416.663195][ T7984] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fa2985d4640 [ 416.663951][ T7984] R13: 0000000000000009 R14: 000000000041b320 R15: 00007fa297dd4000 [ 416.664703][ T7984] [ 416.665040][ T7984] Modules linked in: [ 416.665590][ T7984] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- [ 416.666176][ T7984] RIP: 0010:btrfs_assertfail+0x2c/0x2e [ 416.668775][ T7984] RSP: 0018:ffffc90003ea7e28 EFLAGS: 00010282 [ 416.669425][ T7984] RAX: 00000000000000cc RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 416.670235][ T7984] RDX: ffff88801d030000 RSI: ffffffff81637e7c RDI: fffff520007d4fb7 [ 416.671050][ T7984] RBP: ffffffff8a533de0 R08: 00000000000000cc R09: 0000000000000000 [ 416.671867][ T7984] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffffffff8a533da0 [ 416.672685][ T7984] R13: 00000000000001ca R14: 000000005000940a R15: 0000000000000000 [ 416.673501][ T7984] FS: 00007fa2985d4640(0000) GS:ffff88802cc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 416.674425][ T7984] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 416.675114][ T7984] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000018e5e000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0 [ 416.675933][ T7984] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 416.676760][ T7984] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20230324031611.98986-1-xiaoshoukui@gmail.com/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Signed-off-by: xiaoshoukui Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba