kernel.git/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice, branch linux-5.0.y

ice: Put __ICE_PREPARED_FOR_RESET check in ice_prepare_for_reset

2019-05-31T13:45:24Z

[ Upstream commit 5abac9d7e1bb9a373673811154774d4c89a7f85e ] Currently we check if the __ICE_PREPARED_FOR_RESET bit is set prior to calling ice_prepare_for_reset in ice_reset_subtask(), but we aren't checking that bit in ice_do_reset() before calling ice_prepare_for_reset(). This is not consistent and can cause issues if ice_prepare_for_reset() is called prior to ice_do_reset(). Fix this by checking if the __ICE_PREPARED_FOR_RESET bit is set internal to ice_prepare_for_reset(). Signed-off-by: Brett Creeley Signed-off-by: Anirudh Venkataramanan Tested-by: Andrew Bowers Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ice: Prevent unintended multiple chain resets

2019-05-31T13:45:16Z

[ Upstream commit 2ebd4428d93a2f6ce0c813b10a1a43b6a8241fe5 ] In the current implementation of ice_reset_subtask, if multiple reset types are set in the pf->state, the most intrusive one is meant to be performed only, but the bits requesting the other types are not being cleared. This would lead to another reset being performed the next time the service task is scheduled. Change the flow of ice_reset_subtask so that all reset request bits in pf->state are cleared, and we still perform the most intrusive of the resets requested. Signed-off-by: Dave Ertman Signed-off-by: Anirudh Venkataramanan Tested-by: Andrew Bowers Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ice: Separate if conditions for ice_set_features()

2019-05-31T13:44:52Z

[ Upstream commit 8f529ff912073f778e3cd74e87fb69a36499fc2f ] Set features can have multiple features turned on|off in a single call. Grouping these all in an if/else means after one condition is met, other conditions/features will not be evaluated. Break the if/else statements by feature to ensure all features will be handled properly. Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen Signed-off-by: Anirudh Venkataramanan Tested-by: Andrew Bowers Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ice: fix ice_remove_rule_internal vsi_list handling

2019-04-05T20:34:30Z

[ Upstream commit f9264dd687f8d3f9104c9900f8f3e5e419f27c55 ] When adding multiple VLANs to the same VSI, the ice_add_vlan code will share the VSI list, so as not to create multiple unnecessary VSI lists. Consider the following flow ice_add_vlan(hw, ) Where we add three VLAN filters for VIDs 7, 8, and 9, all for VSI 0. The ice_add_vlan will create a single vsi_list and share it among all the filters. Later, if we try to remove a VLAN, ice_remove_vlan(hw, ) Then the removal code will update the vsi_list and remove VSI 0 from it. But, since the vsi_list is shared, this breaks the list for the other users who reference it. We actually even free the VSI list memory, and may result in segmentation faults. This is due to the way that VLAN rule share VSI lists with reference counts, and is caused because we call ice_rem_update_vsi_list even when the ref_cnt is greater than one. To fix this, handle the case where ref_cnt is greater than one separately. In this case, we need to remove the associated rule without modifying the vsi_list, since it is currently being referenced by another rule. Instead, we just need to decrement the VSI list ref_cnt. The case for handling sharing of VSI lists with multiple VSIs is not currently supported by this code. No such rules will be created today, and this code will require changes if/when such code is added. Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller Reviewed-by: Bruce Allan Signed-off-by: Anirudh Venkataramanan Tested-by: Andrew Bowers Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ice: Do not enable NAPI on q_vectors that have no rings

2018-12-20T20:10:24Z

If ice driver has q_vectors w/ active NAPI that has no rings, then this will result in a divide by zero error. To correct it I am updating the driver code so that we only support NAPI on q_vectors that have 1 or more rings allocated to them. See commit 13a8cd191a2b ("i40e: Do not enable NAPI on q_vectors that have no rings") for detail. Signed-off-by: Young Xiao Acked-by: Anirudh Venkataramanan Tested-by: Andrew Bowers Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher

net: ndo_bridge_setlink: Add extack

2018-12-13T00:34:21Z

Drivers may not be able to implement a VLAN addition or reconfiguration. In those cases it's desirable to explain to the user that it was rejected (and why). To that end, add extack argument to ndo_bridge_setlink. Adapt all users to that change. Following patches will use the new argument in the bridge driver. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata Acked-by: Jiri Pirko Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

ethernet/intel: consolidate NAPI and NAPI exit

2018-11-21T18:35:23Z

While reviewing code, I noticed that Eric Dumazet recommends that drivers check the return code of napi_complete_done, and use that to decide to enable interrupts or not when exiting poll. One of the Intel drivers was already fixed (ixgbe). Upon looking at the Intel drivers as a whole, we are handling our polling and NAPI exit in a few different ways based on whether we have multiqueue and whether we have Tx cleanup included. Several drivers had the bug of exiting NAPI with return 0, which appears to mess up the accounting in the stack. Consolidate all the NAPI routines to do best known way of exiting and to just mostly look like each other. 1) check return code of napi_complete_done to control interrupt enable 2) return the actual amount of work done. 3) return budget immediately if need NAPI poll again Tested the changes on e1000e with a high interrupt rate set, and it shows about an 8% reduction in the CPU utilization when busy polling because we aren't re-enabling interrupts when we're about to be polled. Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg Tested-by: Andrew Bowers Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher

ice: Fix possible NULL pointer de-reference

2018-11-20T19:39:04Z

A recent update to smatch is causing it to report the error "we previously assumed 'm_entry->vsi_list_info' could be null". Fix that. Signed-off-by: Bruce Allan Signed-off-by: Anirudh Venkataramanan Tested-by: Andrew Bowers Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher

ice: Use Tx|Rx in comments

2018-11-20T19:39:04Z

In code comments, use Tx|Rx instead of tx|rx Signed-off-by: Anirudh Venkataramanan Tested-by: Andrew Bowers Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher

ice: Cosmetic formatting changes

2018-11-20T19:39:04Z

1. Fix several cases of double spacing 2. Fix typos 3. Capitalize abbreviations Signed-off-by: Anirudh Venkataramanan Tested-by: Andrew Bowers Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher