<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>kernel.git/drivers/ata/libata-core.c, branch linux-4.4.y</title>
<subtitle>Hosts the 0x221E linux distro kernel.
</subtitle>
<id>https://git.0xinfinity.dev/distro/kernel.git/atom?h=linux-4.4.y</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.0xinfinity.dev/distro/kernel.git/atom?h=linux-4.4.y'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.0xinfinity.dev/distro/kernel.git/'/>
<updated>2021-12-14T09:03:49Z</updated>
<entry>
<title>libata: add horkage for ASMedia 1092</title>
<updated>2021-12-14T09:03:49Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Hannes Reinecke</name>
</author>
<published>2021-12-08T06:58:53Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.0xinfinity.dev/distro/kernel.git/commit/?id=0ab8312e2402c126349afef111f3f4ae287e7e94'/>
<id>urn:sha1:0ab8312e2402c126349afef111f3f4ae287e7e94</id>
<content type='text'>
commit a66307d473077b7aeba74e9b09c841ab3d399c2d upstream.

The ASMedia 1092 has a configuration mode which will present a
dummy device; sadly the implementation falsely claims to provide
a device with 100M which doesn't actually exist.
So disable this device to avoid errors during boot.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke &lt;hare@suse.de&gt;
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal &lt;damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>libata: Add ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_ON_ATI for Samsung 860 and 870 SSD.</title>
<updated>2021-10-09T11:24:30Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Kate Hsuan</name>
</author>
<published>2021-09-03T09:44:11Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.0xinfinity.dev/distro/kernel.git/commit/?id=c90cc2e3c60dace82b7b336bb84f40d4f93767f8'/>
<id>urn:sha1:c90cc2e3c60dace82b7b336bb84f40d4f93767f8</id>
<content type='text'>
commit 7a8526a5cd51cf5f070310c6c37dd7293334ac49 upstream.

Many users are reporting that the Samsung 860 and 870 SSD are having
various issues when combined with AMD/ATI (vendor ID 0x1002)  SATA
controllers and only completely disabling NCQ helps to avoid these
issues.

Always disabling NCQ for Samsung 860/870 SSDs regardless of the host
SATA adapter vendor will cause I/O performance degradation with well
behaved adapters. To limit the performance impact to ATI adapters,
introduce the ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_ON_ATI flag to force disable NCQ
only for these adapters.

Also, two libata.force parameters (noncqati and ncqati) are introduced
to disable and enable the NCQ for the system which equipped with ATI
SATA adapter and Samsung 860 and 870 SSDs. The user can determine NCQ
function to be enabled or disabled according to the demand.

After verifying the chipset from the user reports, the issue appears
on AMD/ATI SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 SATA Controllers and does not appear on
recent AMD SATA adapters. The vendor ID of ATI should be 0x1002.
Therefore, ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_ON_AMD was modified to
ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_ON_ATI.

BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201693
Signed-off-by: Kate Hsuan &lt;hpa@redhat.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede &lt;hdegoede@redhat.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210903094411.58749-1-hpa@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen &lt;martin.petersen@oracle.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
Cc: Krzysztof Olędzki &lt;ole@ans.pl&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>libata: add ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_TRIM for Samsung 860 and 870 SSDs</title>
<updated>2021-09-22T09:41:23Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Hans de Goede</name>
</author>
<published>2021-08-23T09:52:20Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.0xinfinity.dev/distro/kernel.git/commit/?id=92f1f81c5d59adda09a52233c078beef1dd4de11'/>
<id>urn:sha1:92f1f81c5d59adda09a52233c078beef1dd4de11</id>
<content type='text'>
commit 8a6430ab9c9c87cb64c512e505e8690bbaee190b upstream.

Commit ca6bfcb2f6d9 ("libata: Enable queued TRIM for Samsung SSD 860")
limited the existing ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_TRIM quirk from "Samsung SSD 8*",
covering all Samsung 800 series SSDs, to only apply to "Samsung SSD 840*"
and "Samsung SSD 850*" series based on information from Samsung.

But there is a large number of users which is still reporting issues
with the Samsung 860 and 870 SSDs combined with Intel, ASmedia or
Marvell SATA controllers and all reporters also report these problems
going away when disabling queued trims.

Note that with AMD SATA controllers users are reporting even worse
issues and only completely disabling NCQ helps there, this will be
addressed in a separate patch.

Fixes: ca6bfcb2f6d9 ("libata: Enable queued TRIM for Samsung SSD 860")
BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203475
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Kate Hsuan &lt;hpa@redhat.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede &lt;hdegoede@redhat.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal &lt;damien.lemoal@wdc.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen &lt;martin.petersen@oracle.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210823095220.30157-1-hdegoede@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>libata: fix ata_host_start()</title>
<updated>2021-09-22T09:41:19Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Damien Le Moal</name>
</author>
<published>2021-08-16T01:44:47Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.0xinfinity.dev/distro/kernel.git/commit/?id=829194fa98949d325bd0f834b521179f31054a74'/>
<id>urn:sha1:829194fa98949d325bd0f834b521179f31054a74</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 355a8031dc174450ccad2a61c513ad7222d87a97 ]

The loop on entry of ata_host_start() may not initialize host-&gt;ops to a
non NULL value. The test on the host_stop field of host-&gt;ops must then
be preceded by a check that host-&gt;ops is not NULL.

Reported-by: kernel test robot &lt;lkp@intel.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal &lt;damien.lemoal@wdc.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke &lt;hare@suse.de&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210816014456.2191776-3-damien.lemoal@wdc.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>ata: make qc_prep return ata_completion_errors</title>
<updated>2020-10-01T09:11:58Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Jiri Slaby</name>
</author>
<published>2019-10-31T09:59:45Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.0xinfinity.dev/distro/kernel.git/commit/?id=6002dcd35aa356a3ea79d106f94733e7a298f040'/>
<id>urn:sha1:6002dcd35aa356a3ea79d106f94733e7a298f040</id>
<content type='text'>
commit 95364f36701e62dd50eee91e1303187fd1a9f567 upstream.

In case a driver wants to return an error from qc_prep, return enum
ata_completion_errors. sata_mv is one of those drivers -- see the next
patch. Other drivers return the newly defined AC_ERR_OK.

[v2] use enum ata_completion_errors and AC_ERR_OK.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby &lt;jslaby@suse.cz&gt;
Cc: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>libata: Use per port sync for detach</title>
<updated>2020-06-30T00:07:55Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Kai-Heng Feng</name>
</author>
<published>2020-06-03T07:48:19Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.0xinfinity.dev/distro/kernel.git/commit/?id=d8a71a53366a7be14e73bf5dde57846a23d9fa0d'/>
<id>urn:sha1:d8a71a53366a7be14e73bf5dde57846a23d9fa0d</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit b5292111de9bb70cba3489075970889765302136 ]

Commit 130f4caf145c ("libata: Ensure ata_port probe has completed before
detach") may cause system freeze during suspend.

Using async_synchronize_full() in PM callbacks is wrong, since async
callbacks that are already scheduled may wait for not-yet-scheduled
callbacks, causes a circular dependency.

Instead of using big hammer like async_synchronize_full(), use async
cookie to make sure port probe are synced, without affecting other
scheduled PM callbacks.

Fixes: 130f4caf145c ("libata: Ensure ata_port probe has completed before detach")
Suggested-by: John Garry &lt;john.garry@huawei.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng &lt;kai.heng.feng@canonical.com&gt;
Tested-by: John Garry &lt;john.garry@huawei.com&gt;
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867983
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>libata: Ensure ata_port probe has completed before detach</title>
<updated>2020-01-04T12:34:14Z</updated>
<author>
<name>John Garry</name>
</author>
<published>2019-10-16T10:19:52Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.0xinfinity.dev/distro/kernel.git/commit/?id=20ba9b9569f39c75f9031efb26ee1b8b9fe0eb6f'/>
<id>urn:sha1:20ba9b9569f39c75f9031efb26ee1b8b9fe0eb6f</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 130f4caf145c3562108b245a576db30b916199d2 ]

With CONFIG_DEBUG_TEST_DRIVER_REMOVE set, we may find the following WARN:

[   23.452574] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[   23.457190] WARNING: CPU: 59 PID: 1 at drivers/ata/libata-core.c:6676 ata_host_detach+0x15c/0x168
[   23.466047] Modules linked in:
[   23.469092] CPU: 59 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.4.0-rc1-00010-g5b83fd27752b-dirty #296
[   23.477776] Hardware name: Huawei D06 /D06, BIOS Hisilicon D06 UEFI RC0 - V1.16.01 03/15/2019
[   23.486286] pstate: a0c00009 (NzCv daif +PAN +UAO)
[   23.491065] pc : ata_host_detach+0x15c/0x168
[   23.495322] lr : ata_host_detach+0x88/0x168
[   23.499491] sp : ffff800011cabb50
[   23.502792] x29: ffff800011cabb50 x28: 0000000000000007
[   23.508091] x27: ffff80001137f068 x26: ffff8000112c0c28
[   23.513390] x25: 0000000000003848 x24: ffff0023ea185300
[   23.518689] x23: 0000000000000001 x22: 00000000000014c0
[   23.523987] x21: 0000000000013740 x20: ffff0023bdc20000
[   23.529286] x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000004
[   23.534584] x17: 0000000000000001 x16: 00000000000000f0
[   23.539883] x15: ffff0023eac13790 x14: ffff0023eb76c408
[   23.545181] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: ffff0023eac13790
[   23.550480] x11: ffff0023eb76c228 x10: 0000000000000000
[   23.555779] x9 : ffff0023eac13798 x8 : 0000000040000000
[   23.561077] x7 : 0000000000000002 x6 : 0000000000000001
[   23.566376] x5 : 0000000000000002 x4 : 0000000000000000
[   23.571674] x3 : ffff0023bf08a0bc x2 : 0000000000000000
[   23.576972] x1 : 3099674201f72700 x0 : 0000000000400284
[   23.582272] Call trace:
[   23.584706]  ata_host_detach+0x15c/0x168
[   23.588616]  ata_pci_remove_one+0x10/0x18
[   23.592615]  ahci_remove_one+0x20/0x40
[   23.596356]  pci_device_remove+0x3c/0xe0
[   23.600267]  really_probe+0xdc/0x3e0
[   23.603830]  driver_probe_device+0x58/0x100
[   23.608000]  device_driver_attach+0x6c/0x90
[   23.612169]  __driver_attach+0x84/0xc8
[   23.615908]  bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xc8
[   23.619730]  driver_attach+0x20/0x28
[   23.623292]  bus_add_driver+0x148/0x1f0
[   23.627115]  driver_register+0x60/0x110
[   23.630938]  __pci_register_driver+0x40/0x48
[   23.635199]  ahci_pci_driver_init+0x20/0x28
[   23.639372]  do_one_initcall+0x5c/0x1b0
[   23.643199]  kernel_init_freeable+0x1a4/0x24c
[   23.647546]  kernel_init+0x10/0x108
[   23.651023]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
[   23.654590] ---[ end trace 634a14b675b71c13 ]---

With KASAN also enabled, we may also get many use-after-free reports.

The issue is that when CONFIG_DEBUG_TEST_DRIVER_REMOVE is set, we may
attempt to detach the ata_port before it has been probed.

This is because the ata_ports are async probed, meaning that there is no
guarantee that the ata_port has probed prior to detach. When the ata_port
does probe in this scenario, we get all sorts of issues as the detach may
have already happened.

Fix by ensuring synchronisation with async_synchronize_full(). We could
alternatively use the cookie returned from the ata_port probe
async_schedule() call, but that means managing the cookie, so more
complicated.

Signed-off-by: John Garry &lt;john.garry@huawei.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>libata: Extend quirks for the ST1000LM024 drives with NOLPM quirk</title>
<updated>2019-06-22T06:18:22Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Hans de Goede</name>
</author>
<published>2019-06-11T14:32:59Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.0xinfinity.dev/distro/kernel.git/commit/?id=be499b84c3bd1dcfd2c5aa80171ae9c43e7060e8'/>
<id>urn:sha1:be499b84c3bd1dcfd2c5aa80171ae9c43e7060e8</id>
<content type='text'>
commit 31f6264e225fb92cf6f4b63031424f20797c297d upstream.

We've received a bugreport that using LPM with ST1000LM024 drives leads
to system lockups. So it seems that these models are buggy in more then
1 way. Add NOLPM quirk to the existing quirks entry for BROKEN_FPDMA_AA.

BugLink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571330
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen &lt;martin.petersen@oracle.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede &lt;hdegoede@redhat.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>libata: whitelist all SAMSUNG MZ7KM* solid-state disks</title>
<updated>2018-12-21T13:09:53Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Juha-Matti Tilli</name>
</author>
<published>2018-12-02T10:47:08Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.0xinfinity.dev/distro/kernel.git/commit/?id=08349ed6ea70f26ce279059521d329e850bc8fdf'/>
<id>urn:sha1:08349ed6ea70f26ce279059521d329e850bc8fdf</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit fd6f32f78645db32b6b95a42e45da2ddd6de0e67 ]

These devices support read zero after trim (RZAT), as they advertise to
the OS. However, the OS doesn't believe the SSDs unless they are
explicitly whitelisted.

Acked-by: Martin K. Petersen &lt;martin.petersen@oracle.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Juha-Matti Tilli &lt;juha-matti.tilli@iki.fi&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>ahci: Disable LPM on Lenovo 50 series laptops with a too old BIOS</title>
<updated>2018-07-17T09:31:43Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Hans de Goede</name>
</author>
<published>2018-07-01T10:15:46Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.0xinfinity.dev/distro/kernel.git/commit/?id=54b594369ae19fc64b45ca045c26005d5de095d8'/>
<id>urn:sha1:54b594369ae19fc64b45ca045c26005d5de095d8</id>
<content type='text'>
commit 240630e61870e62e39a97225048f9945848fa5f5 upstream.

There have been several reports of LPM related hard freezes about once
a day on multiple Lenovo 50 series models. Strange enough these reports
where not disk model specific as LPM issues usually are and some users
with the exact same disk + laptop where seeing them while other users
where not seeing these issues.

It turns out that enabling LPM triggers a firmware bug somewhere, which
has been fixed in later BIOS versions.

This commit adds a new ahci_broken_lpm() function and a new ATA_FLAG_NO_LPM
for dealing with this.

The ahci_broken_lpm() function contains DMI match info for the 4 models
which are known to be affected by this and the DMI BIOS date field for
known good BIOS versions. If the BIOS date is older then the one in the
table LPM will be disabled and a warning will be printed.

Note the BIOS dates are for known good versions, some older versions may
work too, but we don't know for sure, the table is using dates from BIOS
versions for which users have confirmed that upgrading to that version
makes the problem go away.

Unfortunately I've been unable to get hold of the reporter who reported
that BIOS version 2.35 fixed the problems on the W541 for him. I've been
able to verify the DMI_SYS_VENDOR and DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION from an older
dmidecode, but I don't know the exact BIOS date as reported in the DMI.
Lenovo keeps a changelog with dates in their release notes, but the
dates there are the release dates not the build dates which are in DMI.
So I've chosen to set the date to which we compare to one day past the
release date of the 2.34 BIOS. I plan to fix this with a follow up
commit once I've the necessary info.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede &lt;hdegoede@redhat.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo &lt;tj@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;

</content>
</entry>
</feed>
