kernel.git/drivers/acpi/battery.c, branch linux-4.16.y

Revert "ACPI / battery: Add quirk for Asus GL502VSK and UX305LA"

2018-03-19T09:08:39Z

Revert commit c68f0676ef7d ("ACPI / battery: Add quirk for Asus GL502VSK and UX305LA") and commit 4446823e2573 ("ACPI / battery: Add quirk for Asus UX360UA and UX410UAK"). On many many Asus products, the battery is sometimes reported as charging or discharging even when it is full and you are on AC power. This change quirked the kernel to avoid advertising the discharging state when this happens on 4 laptop models, under the belief that this was incorrect information. I presume it originates from user reports who are confused that their battery status icon says that it is discharging. However, the reported information is indeed correct, and the quirk approach taken is inadequate and more thought is needed first. Specifically: 1. It only quirks discharging state, not charging 2. There are so many different Asus products and DMI naming variants within those product families that behave this way; Linux could grow to quirk hundreds of products and still not even be close at "winning" this battle. 3. Asus previously clarified that this behaviour is intentional. The platform will periodically do a partial discharge/charge cycle when the battery is full, because this is one way to extend the lifetime of the battery (leaving a battery at 100% charge and unused will decrease its usable capacity over time). My understanding is that any decent consumer product will have this behaviour, but it appears that Asus is different in that they expose this info through ACPI. However, the behaviour seems correct. The ACPI spec does not suggest in that the platform should hide the truth. It lets you report that the battery is full of charge, and discharging, and with external power connected; and Asus does this. 4. In terms of not confusing the user, this seems like something that could/should be handled by userspace, which can also detect these same (accurate) conditions in the general case. Revert this quirk before it gets included in a release, while we look for better approaches. Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake Acked-by: Kai-Heng Feng Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki

ACPI / battery: Add quirk for Asus UX360UA and UX410UAK

2018-02-04T08:17:47Z

Same issue as other Asus laptops, ACPI incorrectly reports discharging when battery is full and AC is plugged. Use the same battery quirk can workaround the issue. Link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1661876 Link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1745032 Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki

ACPI / battery: Add quirk for Asus GL502VSK and UX305LA

2017-12-18T11:25:51Z

On Asus GL502VSK and UX305LA, ACPI incorrectly reports discharging when battery is full and AC is plugged. However rate_now is correct under this circumstance, hence we can use "rate_now == 0" as a predicate to report battery full status correctly. Link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1482390 Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki

ACPI: battery: Drop redundant test for failure

2017-12-13T00:14:54Z

Merging the two adjacent conditionally built blocks makes the code a lot more readable. And as a bonus, we drop a duplicate test when CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER is undefined. Signed-off-by: Bjørn Mork Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki

ACPI: make device_attribute const

2017-08-24T01:38:25Z

Make these const as they are only passed as an argument to the function device_create_file and device_remove_file and the corresponding arguments are of type const. Done using Coccinelle Signed-off-by: Bhumika Goyal Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki

ACPI / PM: Ignore spurious SCI wakeups from suspend-to-idle

2017-06-14T22:55:44Z

The ACPI SCI (System Control Interrupt) is set up as a wakeup IRQ during suspend-to-idle transitions and, consequently, any events signaled through it wake up the system from that state. However, on some systems some of the events signaled via the ACPI SCI while suspended to idle should not cause the system to wake up. In fact, quite often they should just be discarded. Arguably, systems should not resume entirely on such events, but in order to decide which events really should cause the system to resume and which are spurious, it is necessary to resume up to the point when ACPI SCIs are actually handled and processed, which is after executing dpm_resume_noirq() in the system resume path. For this reasons, add a loop around freeze_enter() in which the platforms can process events signaled via multiplexed IRQ lines like the ACPI SCI and add suspend-to-idle hooks that can be used for this purpose to struct platform_freeze_ops. In the ACPI case, the ->wake hook is used for checking if the SCI has triggered while suspended and deferring the interrupt-induced system wakeup until the events signaled through it are actually processed sufficiently to decide whether or not the system should resume. In turn, the ->sync hook allows all of the relevant event queues to be flushed so as to prevent events from being missed due to race conditions. In addition to that, some ACPI code processing wakeup events needs to be modified to use the "hard" version of wakeup triggers, so that it will cause a system resume to happen on device-induced wakeup events even if the "soft" mechanism to prevent the system from suspending is not enabled. However, to preserve the existing behavior with respect to suspend-to-RAM, this only is done in the suspend-to-idle case and only if an SCI has occurred while suspended. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki

Merge branches 'intel_pstate' and 'pm-sleep'

2017-06-08T23:25:16Z

* intel_pstate: cpufreq: intel_pstate: Avoid division by 0 in min_perf_pct_min() * pm-sleep: Revert "ACPI / sleep: Ignore spurious SCI wakeups from suspend-to-idle"

Revert "ACPI / sleep: Ignore spurious SCI wakeups from suspend-to-idle"

2017-06-06T22:57:37Z

Revert commit eed4d47efe95 (ACPI / sleep: Ignore spurious SCI wakeups from suspend-to-idle) as it turned out to be premature and triggered a number of different issues on various systems. That includes, but is not limited to, premature suspend-to-RAM aborts on Dell XPS 13 (9343) reported by Dominik. The issue the commit in question attempted to address is real and will need to be taken care of going forward, but evidently more work is needed for this purpose. Reported-by: Dominik Brodowski Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki

Merge branches 'pm-domains', 'pm-cpuidle', 'pm-sleep' and 'powercap'

2017-05-09T21:21:46Z

* pm-domains: PM / Domains: Add DT file to MAINTAINERS PM / Domains: Fix DT example * pm-cpuidle: x86/intel_idle: add Gemini Lake support cpuidle: check dev before usage in cpuidle_use_deepest_state() * pm-sleep: ACPI / sleep: Ignore spurious SCI wakeups from suspend-to-idle PM / wakeup: Integrate mechanism to abort transitions in progress * powercap: powercap: intel_rapl: Add support for Gemini Lake

ACPI / sleep: Ignore spurious SCI wakeups from suspend-to-idle

2017-05-05T20:54:28Z

The ACPI SCI (System Control Interrupt) is set up as a wakeup IRQ during suspend-to-idle transitions and, consequently, any events signaled through it wake up the system from that state. However, on some systems some of the events signaled via the ACPI SCI while suspended to idle should not cause the system to wake up. In fact, quite often they should just be discarded. Arguably, systems should not resume entirely on such events, but in order to decide which events really should cause the system to resume and which are spurious, it is necessary to resume up to the point when ACPI SCIs are actually handled and processed, which is after executing dpm_resume_noirq() in the system resume path. For this reasons, add a loop around freeze_enter() in which the platforms can process events signaled via multiplexed IRQ lines like the ACPI SCI and add suspend-to-idle hooks that can be used for this purpose to struct platform_freeze_ops. In the ACPI case, the ->wake hook is used for checking if the SCI has triggered while suspended and deferring the interrupt-induced system wakeup until the events signaled through it are actually processed sufficiently to decide whether or not the system should resume. In turn, the ->sync hook allows all of the relevant event queues to be flushed so as to prevent events from being missed due to race conditions. In addition to that, some ACPI code processing wakeup events needs to be modified to use the "hard" version of wakeup triggers, so that it will cause a system resume to happen on device-induced wakeup events even if the "soft" mechanism to prevent the system from suspending is not enabled (that also helps to catch device-induced wakeup events occurring during suspend transitions in progress). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki