kernel.git/arch/x86/kernel/cpu, branch linux-5.8.y

x86, powerpc: Rename memcpy_mcsafe() to copy_mc_to_{user, kernel}()

2020-11-01T11:45:37Z

commit ec6347bb43395cb92126788a1a5b25302543f815 upstream. In reaction to a proposal to introduce a memcpy_mcsafe_fast() implementation Linus points out that memcpy_mcsafe() is poorly named relative to communicating the scope of the interface. Specifically what addresses are valid to pass as source, destination, and what faults / exceptions are handled. Of particular concern is that even though x86 might be able to handle the semantics of copy_mc_to_user() with its common copy_user_generic() implementation other archs likely need / want an explicit path for this case: On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 11:28 AM Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 6:21 PM Dan Williams wrote: > > > > However now I see that copy_user_generic() works for the wrong reason. > > It works because the exception on the source address due to poison > > looks no different than a write fault on the user address to the > > caller, it's still just a short copy. So it makes copy_to_user() work > > for the wrong reason relative to the name. > > Right. > > And it won't work that way on other architectures. On x86, we have a > generic function that can take faults on either side, and we use it > for both cases (and for the "in_user" case too), but that's an > artifact of the architecture oddity. > > In fact, it's probably wrong even on x86 - because it can hide bugs - > but writing those things is painful enough that everybody prefers > having just one function. Replace a single top-level memcpy_mcsafe() with either copy_mc_to_user(), or copy_mc_to_kernel(). Introduce an x86 copy_mc_fragile() name as the rename for the low-level x86 implementation formerly named memcpy_mcsafe(). It is used as the slow / careful backend that is supplanted by a fast copy_mc_generic() in a follow-on patch. One side-effect of this reorganization is that separating copy_mc_64.S to its own file means that perf no longer needs to track dependencies for its memcpy_64.S benchmarks. [ bp: Massage a bit. ] Signed-off-by: Dan Williams Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Reviewed-by: Tony Luck Acked-by: Michael Ellerman Cc: Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wjSqtXAqfUJxFtWNwmguFASTgB0dz1dT3V-78Quiezqbg@mail.gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/160195561680.2163339.11574962055305783722.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86/mce: Make mce_rdmsrl() panic on an inaccessible MSR

2020-10-29T09:08:20Z

[ Upstream commit e2def7d49d0812ea40a224161b2001b2e815dce2 ] If an exception needs to be handled while reading an MSR - which is in most of the cases caused by a #GP on a non-existent MSR - then this is most likely the incarnation of a BIOS or a hardware bug. Such bug violates the architectural guarantee that MCA banks are present with all MSRs belonging to them. The proper fix belongs in the hardware/firmware - not in the kernel. Handling an #MC exception which is raised while an NMI is being handled would cause the nasty NMI nesting issue because of the shortcoming of IRET of reenabling NMIs when executed. And the machine is in an #MC context already so be at its side. Tracing MSR accesses while in #MC is another no-no due to tracing being inherently a bad idea in atomic context: vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: do_machine_check()+0x4a: call to mce_rdmsrl() leaves .noinstr.text section so remove all that "additional" functionality from mce_rdmsrl() and provide it with a special exception handler which panics the machine when that MSR is not accessible. The exception handler prints a human-readable message explaining what the panic reason is but, what is more, it panics while in the #GP handler and latter won't have executed an IRET, thus opening the NMI nesting issue in the case when the #MC has happened while handling an NMI. (#MC itself won't be reenabled until MCG_STATUS hasn't been cleared). Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra [ Add missing prototypes for ex_handler_* ] Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Reviewed-by: Tony Luck Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200906212130.GA28456@zn.tnic Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

x86/mce: Annotate mce_rd/wrmsrl() with noinstr

2020-10-29T09:08:19Z

[ Upstream commit e100777016fdf6ec3a9d7c1773b15a2b5eca6c55 ] They do get called from the #MC handler which is already marked "noinstr". Commit e2def7d49d08 ("x86/mce: Make mce_rdmsrl() panic on an inaccessible MSR") already got rid of the instrumentation in the MSR accessors, fix the annotation now too, in order to get rid of: vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: do_machine_check()+0x4a: call to mce_rdmsrl() leaves .noinstr.text section Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200915194020.28807-1-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

x86/mce: Add Skylake quirk for patrol scrub reported errors

2020-10-29T09:08:18Z

[ Upstream commit fd258dc4442c5c1c069c6b5b42bfe7d10cddda95 ] The patrol scrubber in Skylake and Cascade Lake systems can be configured to report uncorrected errors using a special signature in the machine check bank and to signal using CMCI instead of machine check. Update the severity calculation mechanism to allow specifying the model, minimum stepping and range of machine check bank numbers. Add a new rule to detect the special signature (on model 0x55, stepping >=4 in any of the memory controller banks). [ bp: Rewrite it. aegl: Productize it. ] Suggested-by: Youquan Song Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Co-developed-by: Tony Luck Signed-off-by: Tony Luck Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200930021313.31810-2-tony.luck@intel.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

x86/asm: Replace __force_order with a memory clobber

2020-10-29T09:08:17Z

[ Upstream commit aa5cacdc29d76a005cbbee018a47faa6e724dd2d ] The CRn accessor functions use __force_order as a dummy operand to prevent the compiler from reordering CRn reads/writes with respect to each other. The fact that the asm is volatile should be enough to prevent this: volatile asm statements should be executed in program order. However GCC 4.9.x and 5.x have a bug that might result in reordering. This was fixed in 8.1, 7.3 and 6.5. Versions prior to these, including 5.x and 4.9.x, may reorder volatile asm statements with respect to each other. There are some issues with __force_order as implemented: - It is used only as an input operand for the write functions, and hence doesn't do anything additional to prevent reordering writes. - It allows memory accesses to be cached/reordered across write functions, but CRn writes affect the semantics of memory accesses, so this could be dangerous. - __force_order is not actually defined in the kernel proper, but the LLVM toolchain can in some cases require a definition: LLVM (as well as GCC 4.9) requires it for PIE code, which is why the compressed kernel has a definition, but also the clang integrated assembler may consider the address of __force_order to be significant, resulting in a reference that requires a definition. Fix this by: - Using a memory clobber for the write functions to additionally prevent caching/reordering memory accesses across CRn writes. - Using a dummy input operand with an arbitrary constant address for the read functions, instead of a global variable. This will prevent reads from being reordered across writes, while allowing memory loads to be cached/reordered across CRn reads, which should be safe. Signed-off-by: Arvind Sankar Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Reviewed-by: Kees Cook Reviewed-by: Miguel Ojeda Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor Tested-by: Sedat Dilek Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82602 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200527135329.1172644-1-arnd@arndb.de/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200902232152.3709896-1-nivedita@alum.mit.edu Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

x86/bugs/multihit: Fix mitigation reporting when VMX is not in use

2020-08-21T11:15:15Z

[ Upstream commit f29dfa53cc8ae6ad93bae619bcc0bf45cab344f7 ] On systems that have virtualization disabled or unsupported, sysfs mitigation for X86_BUG_ITLB_MULTIHIT is reported incorrectly as: $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/itlb_multihit KVM: Vulnerable System is not vulnerable to DoS attack from a rogue guest when virtualization is disabled or unsupported in the hardware. Change the mitigation reporting for these cases. Fixes: b8e8c8303ff2 ("kvm: mmu: ITLB_MULTIHIT mitigation") Reported-by: Nelson Dsouza Co-developed-by: Sean Christopherson Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Reviewed-by: Tony Luck Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0ba029932a816179b9d14a30db38f0f11ef1f166.1594925782.git.pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

x86/mce/inject: Fix a wrong assignment of i_mce.status

2020-08-19T06:26:03Z

[ Upstream commit 5d7f7d1d5e01c22894dee7c9c9266500478dca99 ] The original code is a nop as i_mce.status is or'ed with part of itself, fix it. Fixes: a1300e505297 ("x86/ras/mce_amd_inj: Trigger deferred and thresholding errors interrupts") Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Acked-by: Yazen Ghannam Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200611023238.3830-1-zhenzhong.duan@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

Merge tag 'x86-urgent-2020-07-05' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

2020-07-05T19:23:49Z

Pull x86 fixes from Thomas Gleixner: "A series of fixes for x86: - Reset MXCSR in kernel_fpu_begin() to prevent using a stale user space value. - Prevent writing MSR_TEST_CTRL on CPUs which are not explicitly whitelisted for split lock detection. Some CPUs which do not support it crash even when the MSR is written to 0 which is the default value. - Fix the XEN PV fallout of the entry code rework - Fix the 32bit fallout of the entry code rework - Add more selftests to ensure that these entry problems don't come back. - Disable 16 bit segments on XEN PV. It's not supported because XEN PV does not implement ESPFIX64" * tag 'x86-urgent-2020-07-05' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: x86/ldt: Disable 16-bit segments on Xen PV x86/entry/32: Fix #MC and #DB wiring on x86_32 x86/entry/xen: Route #DB correctly on Xen PV x86/entry, selftests: Further improve user entry sanity checks x86/entry/compat: Clear RAX high bits on Xen PV SYSENTER selftests/x86: Consolidate and fix get/set_eflags() helpers selftests/x86/syscall_nt: Clear weird flags after each test selftests/x86/syscall_nt: Add more flag combinations x86/entry/64/compat: Fix Xen PV SYSENTER frame setup x86/entry: Move SYSENTER's regs->sp and regs->flags fixups into C x86/entry: Assert that syscalls are on the right stack x86/split_lock: Don't write MSR_TEST_CTRL on CPUs that aren't whitelisted x86/fpu: Reset MXCSR to default in kernel_fpu_begin()

x86/entry/32: Fix #MC and #DB wiring on x86_32

2020-07-04T17:47:26Z

DEFINE_IDTENTRY_MCE and DEFINE_IDTENTRY_DEBUG were wired up as non-RAW on x86_32, but the code expected them to be RAW. Get rid of all the macro indirection for them on 32-bit and just use DECLARE_IDTENTRY_RAW and DEFINE_IDTENTRY_RAW directly. Also add a warning to make sure that we only hit the _kernel paths in kernel mode. Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/9e90a7ee8e72fd757db6d92e1e5ff16339c1ecf9.1593795633.git.luto@kernel.org

x86/split_lock: Don't write MSR_TEST_CTRL on CPUs that aren't whitelisted

2020-06-30T12:09:31Z

Choo! Choo! All aboard the Split Lock Express, with direct service to Wreckage! Skip split_lock_verify_msr() if the CPU isn't whitelisted as a possible SLD-enabled CPU model to avoid writing MSR_TEST_CTRL. MSR_TEST_CTRL exists, and is writable, on many generations of CPUs. Writing the MSR, even with '0', can result in bizarre, undocumented behavior. This fixes a crash on Haswell when resuming from suspend with a live KVM guest. Because APs use the standard SMP boot flow for resume, they will go through split_lock_init() and the subsequent RDMSR/WRMSR sequence, which runs even when sld_state==sld_off to ensure SLD is disabled. On Haswell (at least, my Haswell), writing MSR_TEST_CTRL with '0' will succeed and _may_ take the SMT _sibling_ out of VMX root mode. When KVM has an active guest, KVM performs VMXON as part of CPU onlining (see kvm_starting_cpu()). Because SMP boot is serialized, the resulting flow is effectively: on_each_ap_cpu() { WRMSR(MSR_TEST_CTRL, 0) VMXON } As a result, the WRMSR can disable VMX on a different CPU that has already done VMXON. This ultimately results in a #UD on VMPTRLD when KVM regains control and attempt run its vCPUs. The above voodoo was confirmed by reworking KVM's VMXON flow to write MSR_TEST_CTRL prior to VMXON, and to serialize the sequence as above. Further verification of the insanity was done by redoing VMXON on all APs after the initial WRMSR->VMXON sequence. The additional VMXON, which should VM-Fail, occasionally succeeded, and also eliminated the unexpected #UD on VMPTRLD. The damage done by writing MSR_TEST_CTRL doesn't appear to be limited to VMX, e.g. after suspend with an active KVM guest, subsequent reboots almost always hang (even when fudging VMXON), a #UD on a random Jcc was observed, suspend/resume stability is qualitatively poor, and so on and so forth. kernel BUG at arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:386! CPU: 1 PID: 2592 Comm: CPU 6/KVM Tainted: G D Hardware name: ASUS Q87M-E/Q87M-E, BIOS 1102 03/03/2014 RIP: 0010:kvm_spurious_fault+0xf/0x20 Call Trace: vmx_vcpu_load_vmcs+0x1fb/0x2b0 vmx_vcpu_load+0x3e/0x160 kvm_arch_vcpu_load+0x48/0x260 finish_task_switch+0x140/0x260 __schedule+0x460/0x720 _cond_resched+0x2d/0x40 kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x82e/0x1ca0 kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x363/0x5c0 ksys_ioctl+0x88/0xa0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x4c/0x170 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Fixes: dbaba47085b0c ("x86/split_lock: Rework the initialization flow of split lock detection") Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200605192605.7439-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com