kernel.git/arch/x86/kernel/cpu, branch linux-4.20.y

x86/microcode/amd: Don't falsely trick the late loading mechanism

2019-03-13T21:04:07Z

[ Upstream commit 912139cfbfa6a2bc1da052314d2c29338dae1f6a ] The load_microcode_amd() function searches for microcode patches and attempts to apply a microcode patch if it is of different level than the currently installed level. While the processor won't actually load a level that is less than what is already installed, the logic wrongly returns UCODE_NEW thus signaling to its caller reload_store() that a late loading should be attempted. If the file-system contains an older microcode revision than what is currently running, such a late microcode reload can result in these misleading messages: x86/CPU: CPU features have changed after loading microcode, but might not take effect. x86/CPU: Please consider either early loading through initrd/built-in or a potential BIOS update. These messages were issued on a system where SME/SEV are not enabled by the BIOS (MSR C001_0010[23] = 0b) because during boot, early_detect_mem_encrypt() is called and cleared the SME and SEV features in this case. However, after the wrong late load attempt, get_cpu_cap() is called and reloads the SME and SEV feature bits, resulting in the messages. Update the microcode level check to not attempt microcode loading if the current level is greater than(!) and not only equal to the current patch level. [ bp: massage commit message. ] Fixes: 2613f36ed965 ("x86/microcode: Attempt late loading only when new microcode is present") Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: x86-ml Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/154894518427.9406.8246222496874202773.stgit@tlendack-t1.amdoffice.net Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

x86/CPU/AMD: Set the CPB bit unconditionally on F17h

2019-03-10T06:10:14Z

commit 0237199186e7a4aa5310741f0a6498a20c820fd7 upstream. Some F17h models do not have CPB set in CPUID even though the CPU supports it. Set the feature bit unconditionally on all F17h. [ bp: Rewrite commit message and patch. ] Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Acked-by: Tom Lendacky Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Sherry Hurwitz Cc: Suravee Suthikulpanit Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: x86-ml Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181120030018.5185-1-jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86/MCE: Initialize mce.bank in the case of a fatal error in mce_no_way_out()

2019-02-12T19:02:38Z

commit d28af26faa0b1daf3c692603d46bc4687c16f19e upstream. Internal injection testing crashed with a console log that said: mce: [Hardware Error]: CPU 7: Machine Check Exception: f Bank 0: bd80000000100134 This caused a lot of head scratching because the MCACOD (bits 15:0) of that status is a signature from an L1 data cache error. But Linux says that it found it in "Bank 0", which on this model CPU only reports L1 instruction cache errors. The answer was that Linux doesn't initialize "m->bank" in the case that it finds a fatal error in the mce_no_way_out() pre-scan of banks. If this was a local machine check, then this partially initialized struct mce is being passed to mce_panic(). Fix is simple: just initialize m->bank in the case of a fatal error. Fixes: 40c36e2741d7 ("x86/mce: Fix incorrect "Machine check from unknown source" message") Signed-off-by: Tony Luck Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Vishal Verma Cc: x86-ml Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.18 Note pre-v5.0 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c was called arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190201003341.10638-1-tony.luck@intel.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

cpu/hotplug: Fix "SMT disabled by BIOS" detection for KVM

2019-02-12T19:02:37Z

commit b284909abad48b07d3071a9fc9b5692b3e64914b upstream. With the following commit: 73d5e2b47264 ("cpu/hotplug: detect SMT disabled by BIOS") ... the hotplug code attempted to detect when SMT was disabled by BIOS, in which case it reported SMT as permanently disabled. However, that code broke a virt hotplug scenario, where the guest is booted with only primary CPU threads, and a sibling is brought online later. The problem is that there doesn't seem to be a way to reliably distinguish between the HW "SMT disabled by BIOS" case and the virt "sibling not yet brought online" case. So the above-mentioned commit was a bit misguided, as it permanently disabled SMT for both cases, preventing future virt sibling hotplugs. Going back and reviewing the original problems which were attempted to be solved by that commit, when SMT was disabled in BIOS: 1) /sys/devices/system/cpu/smt/control showed "on" instead of "notsupported"; and 2) vmx_vm_init() was incorrectly showing the L1TF_MSG_SMT warning. I'd propose that we instead consider #1 above to not actually be a problem. Because, at least in the virt case, it's possible that SMT wasn't disabled by BIOS and a sibling thread could be brought online later. So it makes sense to just always default the smt control to "on" to allow for that possibility (assuming cpuid indicates that the CPU supports SMT). The real problem is #2, which has a simple fix: change vmx_vm_init() to query the actual current SMT state -- i.e., whether any siblings are currently online -- instead of looking at the SMT "control" sysfs value. So fix it by: a) reverting the original "fix" and its followup fix: 73d5e2b47264 ("cpu/hotplug: detect SMT disabled by BIOS") bc2d8d262cba ("cpu/hotplug: Fix SMT supported evaluation") and b) changing vmx_vm_init() to query the actual current SMT state -- instead of the sysfs control value -- to determine whether the L1TF warning is needed. This also requires the 'sched_smt_present' variable to exported, instead of 'cpu_smt_control'. Fixes: 73d5e2b47264 ("cpu/hotplug: detect SMT disabled by BIOS") Reported-by: Igor Mammedov Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Joe Mario Cc: Jiri Kosina Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/e3a85d585da28cc333ecbc1e78ee9216e6da9396.1548794349.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86/resctrl: Fix rdt_find_domain() return value and checks

2019-01-26T08:20:45Z

[ Upstream commit 52eb74339a6233c69f4e3794b69ea7c98eeeae1b ] rdt_find_domain() returns an ERR_PTR() that is generated from a provided domain id when the value is negative. Care needs to be taken when creating an ERR_PTR() from this value because a subsequent check using IS_ERR() expects the error to be within the MAX_ERRNO range. Using an invalid domain id as an ERR_PTR() does work at this time since this is currently always -1. Using this undocumented assumption is fragile since future users of rdt_find_domain() may not be aware of thus assumption. Two related issues are addressed: - Ensure that rdt_find_domain() always returns a valid error value by forcing the error to be -ENODEV when a negative domain id is provided. - In a few instances the return value of rdt_find_domain() is just checked for NULL - fix these to include a check of ERR_PTR. Fixes: d89b7379015f ("x86/intel_rdt/cqm: Add mon_data") Fixes: 521348b011d6 ("x86/intel_rdt: Introduce utility to obtain CDP peer") Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Tony Luck Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com Cc: jithu.joseph@intel.com Cc: x86-ml Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/b88cd4ff6a75995bf8db9b0ea546908fe50f69f3.1544479852.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

x86/mce: Fix -Wmissing-prototypes warnings

2019-01-26T08:20:41Z

[ Upstream commit 68b5e4326e4b8ac9080835005d8254fed0fb3c56 ] Add the proper includes and make smca_get_name() static. Fix an actual bug too which the warning triggered: arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c:395:39: error: conflicting \ types for ‘smp_thermal_interrupt’ asmlinkage __visible void __irq_entry smp_thermal_interrupt(struct pt_regs *r) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c:29: ./arch/x86/include/asm/traps.h:107:17: note: previous declaration of \ ‘smp_thermal_interrupt’ was here asmlinkage void smp_thermal_interrupt(void); Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Cc: Yi Wang Cc: Michael Matz Cc: x86@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.21.1811081633160.1549@nanos.tec.linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

x86, modpost: Replace last remnants of RETPOLINE with CONFIG_RETPOLINE

2019-01-16T21:03:21Z

commit e4f358916d528d479c3c12bd2fd03f2d5a576380 upstream. Commit 4cd24de3a098 ("x86/retpoline: Make CONFIG_RETPOLINE depend on compiler support") replaced the RETPOLINE define with CONFIG_RETPOLINE checks. Remove the remaining pieces. [ bp: Massage commit message. ] Fixes: 4cd24de3a098 ("x86/retpoline: Make CONFIG_RETPOLINE depend on compiler support") Signed-off-by: WANG Chao Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Reviewed-by: Zhenzhong Duan Reviewed-by: Masahiro Yamada Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Andi Kleen Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Daniel Borkmann Cc: David Woodhouse Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Jessica Yu Cc: Jiri Kosina Cc: Kees Cook Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: Luc Van Oostenryck Cc: Michal Marek Cc: Miguel Ojeda Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Tim Chen Cc: Vasily Gorbik Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org Cc: srinivas.eeda@oracle.com Cc: stable Cc: x86-ml Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181210163725.95977-1-chao.wang@ucloud.cn Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86/speculation/l1tf: Drop the swap storage limit restriction when l1tf=off

2019-01-09T16:45:54Z

commit 5b5e4d623ec8a34689df98e42d038a3b594d2ff9 upstream. Swap storage is restricted to max_swapfile_size (~16TB on x86_64) whenever the system is deemed affected by L1TF vulnerability. Even though the limit is quite high for most deployments it seems to be too restrictive for deployments which are willing to live with the mitigation disabled. We have a customer to deploy 8x 6,4TB PCIe/NVMe SSD swap devices which is clearly out of the limit. Drop the swap restriction when l1tf=off is specified. It also doesn't make much sense to warn about too much memory for the l1tf mitigation when it is forcefully disabled by the administrator. [ tglx: Folded the documentation delta change ] Fixes: 377eeaa8e11f ("x86/speculation/l1tf: Limit swap file size to MAX_PA/2") Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen Acked-by: Jiri Kosina Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: Andi Kleen Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181113184910.26697-1-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86/mtrr: Don't copy uninitialized gentry fields back to userspace

2018-12-18T23:00:16Z

Currently the copy_to_user of data in the gentry struct is copying uninitiaized data in field _pad from the stack to userspace. Fix this by explicitly memset'ing gentry to zero, this also will zero any compiler added padding fields that may be in struct (currently there are none). Detected by CoverityScan, CID#200783 ("Uninitialized scalar variable") Fixes: b263b31e8ad6 ("x86, mtrr: Use explicit sizing and padding for the 64-bit ioctls") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed-by: Tyler Hicks Cc: security@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181218172956.1440-1-colin.king@canonical.com

x86/intel_rdt: Ensure a CPU remains online for the region's pseudo-locking sequence

2018-12-11T20:59:01Z

The user triggers the creation of a pseudo-locked region when writing the requested schemata to the schemata resctrl file. The pseudo-locking of a region is required to be done on a CPU that is associated with the cache on which the pseudo-locked region will reside. In order to run the locking code on a specific CPU, the needed CPU has to be selected and ensured to remain online during the entire locking sequence. At this time, the cpu_hotplug_lock is not taken during the pseudo-lock region creation and it is thus possible for a CPU to be selected to run the pseudo-locking code and then that CPU to go offline before the thread is able to run on it. Fix this by ensuring that the cpu_hotplug_lock is taken while the CPU on which code has to run needs to be controlled. Since the cpu_hotplug_lock is always taken before rdtgroup_mutex the lock order is maintained. Fixes: e0bdfe8e36f3 ("x86/intel_rdt: Support creation/removal of pseudo-locked region") Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Fenghua Yu Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Tony Luck Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com Cc: jithu.joseph@intel.com Cc: stable Cc: x86-ml Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/b7b17432a80f95a1fa21a1698ba643014f58ad31.1544476425.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com