<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>kernel.git/arch/x86/crypto, branch linux-4.3.y</title>
<subtitle>Hosts the 0x221E linux distro kernel.
</subtitle>
<id>https://git.0xinfinity.dev/distro/kernel.git/atom?h=linux-4.3.y</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.0xinfinity.dev/distro/kernel.git/atom?h=linux-4.3.y'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.0xinfinity.dev/distro/kernel.git/'/>
<updated>2016-02-19T22:28:36Z</updated>
<entry>
<title>crypto: chacha20-ssse3 - Align stack pointer to 64 bytes</title>
<updated>2016-02-19T22:28:36Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Eli Cooper</name>
</author>
<published>2016-01-21T16:24:08Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.0xinfinity.dev/distro/kernel.git/commit/?id=180b8dcc9c9183740dfb9f9df20bc03fbee2790c'/>
<id>urn:sha1:180b8dcc9c9183740dfb9f9df20bc03fbee2790c</id>
<content type='text'>
commit cbe09bd51bf23b42c3a94c5fb6815e1397c5fc3f upstream.

This aligns the stack pointer in chacha20_4block_xor_ssse3 to 64 bytes.
Fixes general protection faults and potential kernel panics.

Signed-off-by: Eli Cooper &lt;elicooper@gmx.com&gt;
Acked-by: Martin Willi &lt;martin@strongswan.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu &lt;herbert@gondor.apana.org.au&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>crypto: crc32c-pclmul - use .rodata instead of .rotata</title>
<updated>2016-02-19T22:28:22Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Nicolas Iooss</name>
</author>
<published>2015-09-20T14:42:36Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.0xinfinity.dev/distro/kernel.git/commit/?id=7333f7d64093432c7653ec8c3b226c7c34e9b2fb'/>
<id>urn:sha1:7333f7d64093432c7653ec8c3b226c7c34e9b2fb</id>
<content type='text'>
commit 97bce7e0b58dfc7d159ded329f57961868fb060b upstream.

Module crc32c-intel uses a special read-only data section named .rotata.
This section is defined for K_table, and its name seems to be a spelling
mistake for .rodata.

Fixes: 473946e674eb ("crypto: crc32c-pclmul - Shrink K_table to 32-bit words")
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Iooss &lt;nicolas.iooss_linux@m4x.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu &lt;herbert@gondor.apana.org.au&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>crypto: camellia_aesni_avx - Fix CPU feature checks</title>
<updated>2015-10-08T13:36:49Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Ben Hutchings</name>
</author>
<published>2015-10-06T11:31:33Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.0xinfinity.dev/distro/kernel.git/commit/?id=92b279070dd6c94265db32748bbeb5b583588de9'/>
<id>urn:sha1:92b279070dd6c94265db32748bbeb5b583588de9</id>
<content type='text'>
We need to explicitly check the AVX and AES CPU features, as we can't
infer them from the related XSAVE feature flags.  For example, the
Core i3 2310M passes the XSAVE feature test but does not implement
AES-NI.

Reported-and-tested-by: Stéphane Glondu &lt;glondu@debian.org&gt;
References: https://bugs.debian.org/800934
Fixes: ce4f5f9b65ae ("x86/fpu, crypto x86/camellia_aesni_avx: Simplify...")
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings &lt;ben@decadent.org.uk&gt;
Cc: stable &lt;stable@vger.kernel.org&gt; # 4.2
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu &lt;herbert@gondor.apana.org.au&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>crypto: ghash-clmulni: specify context size for ghash async algorithm</title>
<updated>2015-09-04T15:21:07Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Andrey Ryabinin</name>
</author>
<published>2015-09-03T11:32:01Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.0xinfinity.dev/distro/kernel.git/commit/?id=71c6da846be478a61556717ef1ee1cea91f5d6a8'/>
<id>urn:sha1:71c6da846be478a61556717ef1ee1cea91f5d6a8</id>
<content type='text'>
Currently context size (cra_ctxsize) doesn't specified for
ghash_async_alg. Which means it's zero. Thus crypto_create_tfm()
doesn't allocate needed space for ghash_async_ctx, so any
read/write to ctx (e.g. in ghash_async_init_tfm()) is not valid.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin &lt;aryabinin@odin.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu &lt;herbert@gondor.apana.org.au&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>crypto: aead - Remove CRYPTO_ALG_AEAD_NEW flag</title>
<updated>2015-08-17T08:53:53Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Herbert Xu</name>
</author>
<published>2015-08-13T09:29:06Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.0xinfinity.dev/distro/kernel.git/commit/?id=5e4b8c1fcc70016f43926203ae1820c3b380d5cd'/>
<id>urn:sha1:5e4b8c1fcc70016f43926203ae1820c3b380d5cd</id>
<content type='text'>
This patch removes the CRYPTO_ALG_AEAD_NEW flag now that everyone
has been converted.

Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu &lt;herbert@gondor.apana.org.au&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>crypto: poly1305 - Add a four block AVX2 variant for x86_64</title>
<updated>2015-07-17T13:20:29Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Martin Willi</name>
</author>
<published>2015-07-16T17:14:08Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.0xinfinity.dev/distro/kernel.git/commit/?id=b1ccc8f4b63109f9e56fadf72274714dfb000123'/>
<id>urn:sha1:b1ccc8f4b63109f9e56fadf72274714dfb000123</id>
<content type='text'>
Extends the x86_64 Poly1305 authenticator by a function processing four
consecutive Poly1305 blocks in parallel using AVX2 instructions.

For large messages, throughput increases by ~15-45% compared to two
block SSE2:

testing speed of poly1305 (poly1305-simd)
test  0 (   96 byte blocks,   16 bytes per update,   6 updates): 3809514 opers/sec,  365713411 bytes/sec
test  1 (   96 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,   3 updates): 5973423 opers/sec,  573448627 bytes/sec
test  2 (   96 byte blocks,   96 bytes per update,   1 updates): 9446779 opers/sec,  906890803 bytes/sec
test  3 (  288 byte blocks,   16 bytes per update,  18 updates): 1364814 opers/sec,  393066691 bytes/sec
test  4 (  288 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,   9 updates): 2045780 opers/sec,  589184697 bytes/sec
test  5 (  288 byte blocks,  288 bytes per update,   1 updates): 3711946 opers/sec, 1069040592 bytes/sec
test  6 ( 1056 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,  33 updates):  573686 opers/sec,  605812732 bytes/sec
test  7 ( 1056 byte blocks, 1056 bytes per update,   1 updates): 1647802 opers/sec, 1740079440 bytes/sec
test  8 ( 2080 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,  65 updates):  292970 opers/sec,  609378224 bytes/sec
test  9 ( 2080 byte blocks, 2080 bytes per update,   1 updates):  943229 opers/sec, 1961916528 bytes/sec
test 10 ( 4128 byte blocks, 4128 bytes per update,   1 updates):  494623 opers/sec, 2041804569 bytes/sec
test 11 ( 8224 byte blocks, 8224 bytes per update,   1 updates):  254045 opers/sec, 2089271014 bytes/sec

testing speed of poly1305 (poly1305-simd)
test  0 (   96 byte blocks,   16 bytes per update,   6 updates): 3826224 opers/sec,  367317552 bytes/sec
test  1 (   96 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,   3 updates): 5948638 opers/sec,  571069267 bytes/sec
test  2 (   96 byte blocks,   96 bytes per update,   1 updates): 9439110 opers/sec,  906154627 bytes/sec
test  3 (  288 byte blocks,   16 bytes per update,  18 updates): 1367756 opers/sec,  393913872 bytes/sec
test  4 (  288 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,   9 updates): 2056881 opers/sec,  592381958 bytes/sec
test  5 (  288 byte blocks,  288 bytes per update,   1 updates): 3711153 opers/sec, 1068812179 bytes/sec
test  6 ( 1056 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,  33 updates):  574940 opers/sec,  607136745 bytes/sec
test  7 ( 1056 byte blocks, 1056 bytes per update,   1 updates): 1948830 opers/sec, 2057964585 bytes/sec
test  8 ( 2080 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,  65 updates):  293308 opers/sec,  610082096 bytes/sec
test  9 ( 2080 byte blocks, 2080 bytes per update,   1 updates): 1235224 opers/sec, 2569267792 bytes/sec
test 10 ( 4128 byte blocks, 4128 bytes per update,   1 updates):  684405 opers/sec, 2825226316 bytes/sec
test 11 ( 8224 byte blocks, 8224 bytes per update,   1 updates):  367101 opers/sec, 3019039446 bytes/sec

Benchmark results from a Core i5-4670T.

Signed-off-by: Martin Willi &lt;martin@strongswan.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu &lt;herbert@gondor.apana.org.au&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>crypto: poly1305 - Add a two block SSE2 variant for x86_64</title>
<updated>2015-07-17T13:20:28Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Martin Willi</name>
</author>
<published>2015-07-16T17:14:07Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.0xinfinity.dev/distro/kernel.git/commit/?id=da35b22df301128ba2f2238befd6d75067e80315'/>
<id>urn:sha1:da35b22df301128ba2f2238befd6d75067e80315</id>
<content type='text'>
Extends the x86_64 SSE2 Poly1305 authenticator by a function processing two
consecutive Poly1305 blocks in parallel using a derived key r^2. Loop
unrolling can be more effectively mapped to SSE instructions, further
increasing throughput.

For large messages, throughput increases by ~45-65% compared to single
block SSE2:

testing speed of poly1305 (poly1305-simd)
test  0 (   96 byte blocks,   16 bytes per update,   6 updates): 3790063 opers/sec,  363846076 bytes/sec
test  1 (   96 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,   3 updates): 5913378 opers/sec,  567684355 bytes/sec
test  2 (   96 byte blocks,   96 bytes per update,   1 updates): 9352574 opers/sec,  897847104 bytes/sec
test  3 (  288 byte blocks,   16 bytes per update,  18 updates): 1362145 opers/sec,  392297990 bytes/sec
test  4 (  288 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,   9 updates): 2007075 opers/sec,  578037628 bytes/sec
test  5 (  288 byte blocks,  288 bytes per update,   1 updates): 3709811 opers/sec, 1068425798 bytes/sec
test  6 ( 1056 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,  33 updates):  566272 opers/sec,  597984182 bytes/sec
test  7 ( 1056 byte blocks, 1056 bytes per update,   1 updates): 1111657 opers/sec, 1173910108 bytes/sec
test  8 ( 2080 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,  65 updates):  288857 opers/sec,  600823808 bytes/sec
test  9 ( 2080 byte blocks, 2080 bytes per update,   1 updates):  590746 opers/sec, 1228751888 bytes/sec
test 10 ( 4128 byte blocks, 4128 bytes per update,   1 updates):  301825 opers/sec, 1245936902 bytes/sec
test 11 ( 8224 byte blocks, 8224 bytes per update,   1 updates):  153075 opers/sec, 1258896201 bytes/sec

testing speed of poly1305 (poly1305-simd)
test  0 (   96 byte blocks,   16 bytes per update,   6 updates): 3809514 opers/sec,  365713411 bytes/sec
test  1 (   96 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,   3 updates): 5973423 opers/sec,  573448627 bytes/sec
test  2 (   96 byte blocks,   96 bytes per update,   1 updates): 9446779 opers/sec,  906890803 bytes/sec
test  3 (  288 byte blocks,   16 bytes per update,  18 updates): 1364814 opers/sec,  393066691 bytes/sec
test  4 (  288 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,   9 updates): 2045780 opers/sec,  589184697 bytes/sec
test  5 (  288 byte blocks,  288 bytes per update,   1 updates): 3711946 opers/sec, 1069040592 bytes/sec
test  6 ( 1056 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,  33 updates):  573686 opers/sec,  605812732 bytes/sec
test  7 ( 1056 byte blocks, 1056 bytes per update,   1 updates): 1647802 opers/sec, 1740079440 bytes/sec
test  8 ( 2080 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,  65 updates):  292970 opers/sec,  609378224 bytes/sec
test  9 ( 2080 byte blocks, 2080 bytes per update,   1 updates):  943229 opers/sec, 1961916528 bytes/sec
test 10 ( 4128 byte blocks, 4128 bytes per update,   1 updates):  494623 opers/sec, 2041804569 bytes/sec
test 11 ( 8224 byte blocks, 8224 bytes per update,   1 updates):  254045 opers/sec, 2089271014 bytes/sec

Benchmark results from a Core i5-4670T.

Signed-off-by: Martin Willi &lt;martin@strongswan.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu &lt;herbert@gondor.apana.org.au&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>crypto: poly1305 - Add a SSE2 SIMD variant for x86_64</title>
<updated>2015-07-17T13:20:27Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Martin Willi</name>
</author>
<published>2015-07-16T17:14:06Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.0xinfinity.dev/distro/kernel.git/commit/?id=c70f4abef07a99db6654be4f1190bacd69aa4365'/>
<id>urn:sha1:c70f4abef07a99db6654be4f1190bacd69aa4365</id>
<content type='text'>
Implements an x86_64 assembler driver for the Poly1305 authenticator. This
single block variant holds the 130-bit integer in 5 32-bit words, but uses
SSE to do two multiplications/additions in parallel.

When calling updates with small blocks, the overhead for kernel_fpu_begin/
kernel_fpu_end() negates the perfmance gain. We therefore use the
poly1305-generic fallback for small updates.

For large messages, throughput increases by ~5-10% compared to
poly1305-generic:

testing speed of poly1305 (poly1305-generic)
test  0 (   96 byte blocks,   16 bytes per update,   6 updates): 4080026 opers/sec,  391682496 bytes/sec
test  1 (   96 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,   3 updates): 6221094 opers/sec,  597225024 bytes/sec
test  2 (   96 byte blocks,   96 bytes per update,   1 updates): 9609750 opers/sec,  922536057 bytes/sec
test  3 (  288 byte blocks,   16 bytes per update,  18 updates): 1459379 opers/sec,  420301267 bytes/sec
test  4 (  288 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,   9 updates): 2115179 opers/sec,  609171609 bytes/sec
test  5 (  288 byte blocks,  288 bytes per update,   1 updates): 3729874 opers/sec, 1074203856 bytes/sec
test  6 ( 1056 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,  33 updates):  593000 opers/sec,  626208000 bytes/sec
test  7 ( 1056 byte blocks, 1056 bytes per update,   1 updates): 1081536 opers/sec, 1142102332 bytes/sec
test  8 ( 2080 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,  65 updates):  302077 opers/sec,  628320576 bytes/sec
test  9 ( 2080 byte blocks, 2080 bytes per update,   1 updates):  554384 opers/sec, 1153120176 bytes/sec
test 10 ( 4128 byte blocks, 4128 bytes per update,   1 updates):  278715 opers/sec, 1150536345 bytes/sec
test 11 ( 8224 byte blocks, 8224 bytes per update,   1 updates):  140202 opers/sec, 1153022070 bytes/sec

testing speed of poly1305 (poly1305-simd)
test  0 (   96 byte blocks,   16 bytes per update,   6 updates): 3790063 opers/sec,  363846076 bytes/sec
test  1 (   96 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,   3 updates): 5913378 opers/sec,  567684355 bytes/sec
test  2 (   96 byte blocks,   96 bytes per update,   1 updates): 9352574 opers/sec,  897847104 bytes/sec
test  3 (  288 byte blocks,   16 bytes per update,  18 updates): 1362145 opers/sec,  392297990 bytes/sec
test  4 (  288 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,   9 updates): 2007075 opers/sec,  578037628 bytes/sec
test  5 (  288 byte blocks,  288 bytes per update,   1 updates): 3709811 opers/sec, 1068425798 bytes/sec
test  6 ( 1056 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,  33 updates):  566272 opers/sec,  597984182 bytes/sec
test  7 ( 1056 byte blocks, 1056 bytes per update,   1 updates): 1111657 opers/sec, 1173910108 bytes/sec
test  8 ( 2080 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,  65 updates):  288857 opers/sec,  600823808 bytes/sec
test  9 ( 2080 byte blocks, 2080 bytes per update,   1 updates):  590746 opers/sec, 1228751888 bytes/sec
test 10 ( 4128 byte blocks, 4128 bytes per update,   1 updates):  301825 opers/sec, 1245936902 bytes/sec
test 11 ( 8224 byte blocks, 8224 bytes per update,   1 updates):  153075 opers/sec, 1258896201 bytes/sec

Benchmark results from a Core i5-4670T.

Signed-off-by: Martin Willi &lt;martin@strongswan.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu &lt;herbert@gondor.apana.org.au&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>crypto: chacha20 - Add an eight block AVX2 variant for x86_64</title>
<updated>2015-07-17T13:20:25Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Martin Willi</name>
</author>
<published>2015-07-16T17:14:03Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.0xinfinity.dev/distro/kernel.git/commit/?id=3d1e93cdf16cfe6f315167c65dc504e467e4681a'/>
<id>urn:sha1:3d1e93cdf16cfe6f315167c65dc504e467e4681a</id>
<content type='text'>
Extends the x86_64 ChaCha20 implementation by a function processing eight
ChaCha20 blocks in parallel using AVX2.

For large messages, throughput increases by ~55-70% compared to four block
SSSE3:

testing speed of chacha20 (chacha20-simd) encryption
test 0 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 42249230 operations in 10 seconds (675987680 bytes)
test 1 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 46441641 operations in 10 seconds (2972265024 bytes)
test 2 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 33028112 operations in 10 seconds (8455196672 bytes)
test 3 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 11568759 operations in 10 seconds (11846409216 bytes)
test 4 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1448761 operations in 10 seconds (11868250112 bytes)

testing speed of chacha20 (chacha20-simd) encryption
test 0 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 41999675 operations in 10 seconds (671994800 bytes)
test 1 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 45805908 operations in 10 seconds (2931578112 bytes)
test 2 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 32814947 operations in 10 seconds (8400626432 bytes)
test 3 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 19777167 operations in 10 seconds (20251819008 bytes)
test 4 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 2279321 operations in 10 seconds (18672197632 bytes)

Benchmark results from a Core i5-4670T.

Signed-off-by: Martin Willi &lt;martin@strongswan.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu &lt;herbert@gondor.apana.org.au&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>crypto: chacha20 - Add a four block SSSE3 variant for x86_64</title>
<updated>2015-07-17T13:20:25Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Martin Willi</name>
</author>
<published>2015-07-16T17:14:02Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.0xinfinity.dev/distro/kernel.git/commit/?id=274f938e0a01286f465d84d5a3f1565225f4ec4b'/>
<id>urn:sha1:274f938e0a01286f465d84d5a3f1565225f4ec4b</id>
<content type='text'>
Extends the x86_64 SSSE3 ChaCha20 implementation by a function processing
four ChaCha20 blocks in parallel. This avoids the word shuffling needed
in the single block variant, further increasing throughput.

For large messages, throughput increases by ~110% compared to single block
SSSE3:

testing speed of chacha20 (chacha20-simd) encryption
test 0 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 43141886 operations in 10 seconds (690270176 bytes)
test 1 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 46845874 operations in 10 seconds (2998135936 bytes)
test 2 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 18458512 operations in 10 seconds (4725379072 bytes)
test 3 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 5360533 operations in 10 seconds (5489185792 bytes)
test 4 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 692846 operations in 10 seconds (5675794432 bytes)

testing speed of chacha20 (chacha20-simd) encryption
test 0 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 42249230 operations in 10 seconds (675987680 bytes)
test 1 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 46441641 operations in 10 seconds (2972265024 bytes)
test 2 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 33028112 operations in 10 seconds (8455196672 bytes)
test 3 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 11568759 operations in 10 seconds (11846409216 bytes)
test 4 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1448761 operations in 10 seconds (11868250112 bytes)

Benchmark results from a Core i5-4670T.

Signed-off-by: Martin Willi &lt;martin@strongswan.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu &lt;herbert@gondor.apana.org.au&gt;
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
