kernel.git/arch/s390/net, branch linux-3.19.y

s390/bpf: Zero extend parameters before calling C function

2015-01-15T10:10:41Z

The s390x ABI requires to zero extend parameters before functions are called. Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky

s390/bpf: Fix sk_load_byte_msh()

2015-01-15T10:10:37Z

In sk_load_byte_msh() sk_load_byte_slow() is called instead of sk_load_byte_msh_slow(). Fix this and call the correct function. Besides of this load only one byte instead of two and fix the comment. Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky

s390/bpf: Fix offset parameter for skb_copy_bits()

2015-01-15T10:10:33Z

Currently the offset parameter for skb_copy_bits is changed in sk_load_word() and sk_load_half(). Therefore it is not correct when calling skb_copy_bits(). Fix this and use the original offset for the function call. Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky

s390/bpf: Fix skb_copy_bits() parameter passing

2015-01-15T10:10:29Z

The skb_copy_bits() function has the following signature: int skb_copy_bits(const struct sk_buff *skb, int offset, void *to, int len) Currently in bpf_jit.S the "to" and "len" parameters have been exchanged. So fix this and call the function with the correct parameters. Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky

s390/bpf: Fix JMP_JGE_K (A >= K) and JMP_JGT_K (A > K)

2015-01-15T07:17:42Z

Currently the signed COMPARE HALFWORD IMMEDIATE (chi) and COMPARE (c) instructions are used to compare "A" with "K". This is not correct because "A" and "K" are both unsigned. To fix this remove the chi instruction (no unsigned analogon available) and use the unsigned COMPARE LOGICAL (cl) instruction instead of COMPARE (c). Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky

s390/bpf: Fix JMP_JGE_X (A > X) and JMP_JGT_X (A >= X)

2015-01-09T09:10:32Z

Currently the signed COMPARE (cr) instruction is used to compare "A" with "X". This is not correct because "A" and "X" are both unsigned. To fix this use the unsigned COMPARE LOGICAL (clr) instruction instead. Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky

s390/bpf: Fix ALU_NEG (A = -A)

2015-01-09T09:10:30Z

Currently the LOAD NEGATIVE (lnr) instruction is used for ALU_NEG. This instruction always loads the negative value. Therefore, if A is already negative, it remains unchanged. To fix this use LOAD COMPLEMENT (lcr) instead. Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky

net: filter: constify detection of pkt_type_offset

2014-09-13T21:07:21Z

Currently we have 2 pkt_type_offset functions doing the same thing and spread across the architecture files. Remove those and replace them with a PKT_TYPE_OFFSET macro helper which gets the constant value from a zero sized sk_buff member right in front of the bitfield with offsetof. This new offset marker does not change size of struct sk_buff. Cc: Eric Dumazet Cc: Markos Chandras Cc: Martin Schwidefsky Cc: Daniel Borkmann Cc: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

net: bpf: be friendly to kmemcheck

2014-09-09T23:58:56Z

Reported by Mikulas Patocka, kmemcheck currently barks out a false positive since we don't have special kmemcheck annotation for bitfields used in bpf_prog structure. We currently have jited:1, len:31 and thus when accessing len while CONFIG_KMEMCHECK enabled, kmemcheck throws a warning that we're reading uninitialized memory. As we don't need the whole bit universe for pages member, we can just split it to u16 and use a bool flag for jited instead of a bitfield. Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

net: bpf: consolidate JIT binary allocator

2014-09-09T23:58:56Z

Introduced in commit 314beb9bcabf ("x86: bpf_jit_comp: secure bpf jit against spraying attacks") and later on replicated in aa2d2c73c21f ("s390/bpf,jit: address randomize and write protect jit code") for s390 architecture, write protection for BPF JIT images got added and a random start address of the JIT code, so that it's not on a page boundary anymore. Since both use a very similar allocator for the BPF binary header, we can consolidate this code into the BPF core as it's mostly JIT independant anyway. This will also allow for future archs that support DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX to just reuse instead of reimplementing it. JIT tested on x86_64 and s390x with BPF test suite. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Eric Dumazet Cc: Heiko Carstens Cc: Martin Schwidefsky Signed-off-by: David S. Miller