kernel.git/arch/arm64/net, branch linux-4.9.y

bpf: get rid of pure_initcall dependency to enable jits

2019-08-25T08:51:40Z

commit fa9dd599b4dae841924b022768354cfde9affecb upstream. Having a pure_initcall() callback just to permanently enable BPF JITs under CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON is unnecessary and could leave a small race window in future where JIT is still disabled on boot. Since we know about the setting at compilation time anyway, just initialize it properly there. Also consolidate all the individual bpf_jit_enable variables into a single one and move them under one location. Moreover, don't allow for setting unspecified garbage values on them. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov [bwh: Backported to 4.9 as dependency of commit 2e4a30983b0f "bpf: restrict access to core bpf sysctls": - Drop change in arch/mips/net/ebpf_jit.c - Drop change to bpf_jit_kallsyms - Adjust filenames, context] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf, arm64: fix out of bounds access in tail call

2018-03-11T15:21:34Z

[ upstream commit 16338a9b3ac30740d49f5dfed81bac0ffa53b9c7 ] I recently noticed a crash on arm64 when feeding a bogus index into BPF tail call helper. The crash would not occur when the interpreter is used, but only in case of JIT. Output looks as follows: [ 347.007486] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address fffb850e96492510 [...] [ 347.043065] [fffb850e96492510] address between user and kernel address ranges [ 347.050205] Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] SMP [...] [ 347.190829] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 [ 347.196128] x11: fffc047ebe782800 x10: ffff808fd7d0fd10 [ 347.201427] x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : 0000000000000000 [ 347.206726] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 001c991738000000 [ 347.212025] x5 : 0000000000000018 x4 : 000000000000ba5a [ 347.217325] x3 : 00000000000329c4 x2 : ffff808fd7cf0500 [ 347.222625] x1 : ffff808fd7d0fc00 x0 : ffff808fd7cf0500 [ 347.227926] Process test_verifier (pid: 4548, stack limit = 0x000000007467fa61) [ 347.235221] Call trace: [ 347.237656] 0xffff000002f3a4fc [ 347.240784] bpf_test_run+0x78/0xf8 [ 347.244260] bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x148/0x230 [ 347.248694] SyS_bpf+0x77c/0x1110 [ 347.251999] el0_svc_naked+0x30/0x34 [ 347.255564] Code: 9100075a d280220a 8b0a002a d37df04b (f86b694b) [...] In this case the index used in BPF r3 is the same as in r1 at the time of the call, meaning we fed a pointer as index; here, it had the value 0xffff808fd7cf0500 which sits in x2. While I found tail calls to be working in general (also for hitting the error cases), I noticed the following in the code emission: # bpftool p d j i 988 [...] 38: ldr w10, [x1,x10] 3c: cmp w2, w10 40: b.ge 0x000000000000007c <-- signed cmp 44: mov x10, #0x20 // #32 48: cmp x26, x10 4c: b.gt 0x000000000000007c 50: add x26, x26, #0x1 54: mov x10, #0x110 // #272 58: add x10, x1, x10 5c: lsl x11, x2, #3 60: ldr x11, [x10,x11] <-- faulting insn (f86b694b) 64: cbz x11, 0x000000000000007c [...] Meaning, the tests passed because commit ddb55992b04d ("arm64: bpf: implement bpf_tail_call() helper") was using signed compares instead of unsigned which as a result had the test wrongly passing. Change this but also the tail call count test both into unsigned and cap the index as u32. Latter we did as well in 90caccdd8cc0 ("bpf: fix bpf_tail_call() x64 JIT") and is needed in addition here, too. Tested on HiSilicon Hi1616. Result after patch: # bpftool p d j i 268 [...] 38: ldr w10, [x1,x10] 3c: add w2, w2, #0x0 40: cmp w2, w10 44: b.cs 0x0000000000000080 48: mov x10, #0x20 // #32 4c: cmp x26, x10 50: b.hi 0x0000000000000080 54: add x26, x26, #0x1 58: mov x10, #0x110 // #272 5c: add x10, x1, x10 60: lsl x11, x2, #3 64: ldr x11, [x10,x11] 68: cbz x11, 0x0000000000000080 [...] Fixes: ddb55992b04d ("arm64: bpf: implement bpf_tail_call() helper") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf, arm64: fix faulty emission of map access in tail calls

2017-06-07T10:07:43Z

[ Upstream commit d8b54110ee944de522ccd3531191f39986ec20f9 ] Shubham was recently asking on netdev why in arm64 JIT we don't multiply the index for accessing the tail call map by 8. That led me into testing out arm64 JIT wrt tail calls and it turned out I got a NULL pointer dereference on the tail call. The buggy access is at: prog = array->ptrs[index]; if (prog == NULL) goto out; [...] 00000060: d2800e0a mov x10, #0x70 // #112 00000064: f86a682a ldr x10, [x1,x10] 00000068: f862694b ldr x11, [x10,x2] 0000006c: b40000ab cbz x11, 0x00000080 [...] The code triggering the crash is f862694b. x1 at the time contains the address of the bpf array, x10 offsetof(struct bpf_array, ptrs). Meaning, above we load the pointer to the program at map slot 0 into x10. x10 can then be NULL if the slot is not occupied, which we later on try to access with a user given offset in x2 that is the map index. Fix this by emitting the following instead: [...] 00000060: d2800e0a mov x10, #0x70 // #112 00000064: 8b0a002a add x10, x1, x10 00000068: d37df04b lsl x11, x2, #3 0000006c: f86b694b ldr x11, [x10,x11] 00000070: b40000ab cbz x11, 0x00000084 [...] This basically adds the offset to ptrs to the base address of the bpf array we got and we later on access the map with an index * 8 offset relative to that. The tail call map itself is basically one large area with meta data at the head followed by the array of prog pointers. This makes tail calls working again, tested on Cavium ThunderX ARMv8. Fixes: ddb55992b04d ("arm64: bpf: implement bpf_tail_call() helper") Reported-by: Shubham Bansal Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf, arm64: fix jit branch offset related to ldimm64

2017-05-14T12:00:21Z

[ Upstream commit ddc665a4bb4b728b4e6ecec8db1b64efa9184b9c ] When the instruction right before the branch destination is a 64 bit load immediate, we currently calculate the wrong jump offset in the ctx->offset[] array as we only account one instruction slot for the 64 bit load immediate although it uses two BPF instructions. Fix it up by setting the offset into the right slot after we incremented the index. Before (ldimm64 test 1): [...] 00000020: 52800007 mov w7, #0x0 // #0 00000024: d2800060 mov x0, #0x3 // #3 00000028: d2800041 mov x1, #0x2 // #2 0000002c: eb01001f cmp x0, x1 00000030: 54ffff82 b.cs 0x00000020 00000034: d29fffe7 mov x7, #0xffff // #65535 00000038: f2bfffe7 movk x7, #0xffff, lsl #16 0000003c: f2dfffe7 movk x7, #0xffff, lsl #32 00000040: f2ffffe7 movk x7, #0xffff, lsl #48 00000044: d29dddc7 mov x7, #0xeeee // #61166 00000048: f2bdddc7 movk x7, #0xeeee, lsl #16 0000004c: f2ddddc7 movk x7, #0xeeee, lsl #32 00000050: f2fdddc7 movk x7, #0xeeee, lsl #48 [...] After (ldimm64 test 1): [...] 00000020: 52800007 mov w7, #0x0 // #0 00000024: d2800060 mov x0, #0x3 // #3 00000028: d2800041 mov x1, #0x2 // #2 0000002c: eb01001f cmp x0, x1 00000030: 540000a2 b.cs 0x00000044 00000034: d29fffe7 mov x7, #0xffff // #65535 00000038: f2bfffe7 movk x7, #0xffff, lsl #16 0000003c: f2dfffe7 movk x7, #0xffff, lsl #32 00000040: f2ffffe7 movk x7, #0xffff, lsl #48 00000044: d29dddc7 mov x7, #0xeeee // #61166 00000048: f2bdddc7 movk x7, #0xeeee, lsl #16 0000004c: f2ddddc7 movk x7, #0xeeee, lsl #32 00000050: f2fdddc7 movk x7, #0xeeee, lsl #48 [...] Also, add a couple of test cases to make sure JITs pass this test. Tested on Cavium ThunderX ARMv8. The added test cases all pass after the fix. Fixes: 8eee539ddea0 ("arm64: bpf: fix out-of-bounds read in bpf2a64_offset()") Reported-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Xi Wang Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

arm64: bpf: optimize LD_ABS, LD_IND

2016-06-11T06:11:50Z

Remove superfluous stack frame, saving us 3 instructions for every LD_ABS or LD_IND. Signed-off-by: Zi Shen Lim Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

arm64: bpf: optimize JMP_CALL

2016-06-11T06:11:50Z

Remove superfluous stack frame, saving us 3 instructions for every JMP_CALL. Signed-off-by: Zi Shen Lim Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

arm64: bpf: implement bpf_tail_call() helper

2016-06-11T06:11:49Z

Add support for JMP_CALL_X (tail call) introduced by commit 04fd61ab36ec ("bpf: allow bpf programs to tail-call other bpf programs"). bpf_tail_call() arguments: ctx - context pointer passed to next program array - pointer to map which type is BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY index - index inside array that selects specific program to run In this implementation arm64 JIT jumps into callee program after prologue, so callee program reuses the same stack. For tail_call_cnt, we use the callee-saved R26 (which was already saved/restored but previously unused by JIT). With this patch a tail call generates the following code on arm64: if (index >= array->map.max_entries) goto out; 34: mov x10, #0x10 // #16 38: ldr w10, [x1,x10] 3c: cmp w2, w10 40: b.ge 0x0000000000000074 if (tail_call_cnt > MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT) goto out; tail_call_cnt++; 44: mov x10, #0x20 // #32 48: cmp x26, x10 4c: b.gt 0x0000000000000074 50: add x26, x26, #0x1 prog = array->ptrs[index]; if (prog == NULL) goto out; 54: mov x10, #0x68 // #104 58: ldr x10, [x1,x10] 5c: ldr x11, [x10,x2] 60: cbz x11, 0x0000000000000074 goto *(prog->bpf_func + prologue_size); 64: mov x10, #0x20 // #32 68: ldr x10, [x11,x10] 6c: add x10, x10, #0x20 70: br x10 74: Signed-off-by: Zi Shen Lim Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

bpf: arm64: remove callee-save registers use for tmp registers

2016-05-17T18:03:33Z

In the current implementation of ARM64 eBPF JIT, R23 and R24 are used for tmp registers, which are callee-saved registers. This leads to variable size of JIT prologue and epilogue. The latest blinding constant change prefers to constant size of prologue and epilogue. AAPCS reserves R9 ~ R15 for temp registers which not need to be saved/restored during function call. So, replace R23 and R24 to R10 and R11, and remove tmp_used flag to save 2 instructions for some jited BPF program. CC: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Zi Shen Lim Signed-off-by: Yang Shi Acked-by: Catalin Marinas Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

bpf, arm64: add support for constant blinding

2016-05-16T17:49:33Z

This patch adds recently added constant blinding helpers into the arm64 eBPF JIT. In the bpf_int_jit_compile() path, requirements are to utilize bpf_jit_blind_constants()/bpf_jit_prog_release_other() pair for rewriting the program into a blinded one, and to map the BPF_REG_AX register to a CPU register. The mapping is on x9. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Zi Shen Lim Acked-by: Yang Shi Tested-by: Yang Shi Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

bpf: prepare bpf_int_jit_compile/bpf_prog_select_runtime apis

2016-05-16T17:49:32Z

Since the blinding is strictly only called from inside eBPF JITs, we need to change signatures for bpf_int_jit_compile() and bpf_prog_select_runtime() first in order to prepare that the eBPF program we're dealing with can change underneath. Hence, for call sites, we need to return the latest prog. No functional change in this patch. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller